Hello Stan,
I stand corrected. I probably shouldn't have said that -- it's way too
early for me here.
But I really can't understand why the two points I summarized for Lotte
are not practically conclusive, and there hasn't been any discussion
about it in the list.
Worse performance? Why do that? Especially for a condition that almost
never arises?
Regards,
Charlie P.
On 6/26/2015 8:09 AM, Ratliff, Stanley wrote:
-----Original Message-----Incorrect. I read it. It didn't change my position.
From: aodvv2-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aodvv2-discuss-
bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charlie Perkins
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 11:07 AM
To: aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aodvv2-discuss] Re: Decision time, folks
Hello Lotte,
Did you read my email to Justin about the difference between multicast and
unicast?
To summarize:
- multicast is an *order of magnitude* more expensive than unicast, even
over a single hop with one neighbor
- multicast is NOT reliable over 802.11 and unicast IS reliable (so RREP is
*less
likely* to be received).
I don't understand how you could vote for multicast if you read that.
Is it just that you don't believe me?
I doubt that Stan read it.
Stan
Regards,
Charlie P.
On 6/26/2015 12:25 AM, Lotte Steenbrink wrote:
Hi all,okay with Vicky's version, but maybe we could squeeze in a sentence
Am 25.06.2015 um 17:52 schrieb "Ratliff, Stanley" <sratliff@xxxxxxxxxxx>:+1, if that's doable considering the time we have left. Otherwise, I'd also be
John,
My opinions on the items before us:
1. Unconfirmed routes: Go multicast, as was suggested by Justin Dean.
outlining the consequences of not using rrep_ack?
Concerning the Gateways, I'll trust whatever you all decide, since I don'tthink I have the experience it takes to make a useful decision.
Regards,router. I've not heard, therefore it's not clear, exactly where Justin & Charlie
Lotte
2. Gateways: Leave text in about Gateway router not being default
are in their discussion wrt Gateways. For example, is that the only issue left?
Are there substantial points remaining that might adversely affect a request
for last call?
come to consensus for now.Regards,
Stan
-----Original Message-----
From: aodvv2-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aodvv2-discuss-
bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Dowdell
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 5:04 AM
To: AODVv2 Discuss
Subject: [aodvv2-discuss] Decision time, folks
Good morning all
As you all know, draft submission cut off time is 2359 UTC on Monday
6 July (= 0059 July 7 in UK). Vicky is on holiday next week, and
Lotte is fast approaching (if not already in) exam time, which means
we need to go firm on two topics currently under discussion by the
time Vicky starts work at 0900 UK time tomorrow (so that's 0100
Friday for Charlie,
0400 Stan and 1000 Lotte) in order for Vicky to make final
substantive changes. Any remaining scraps can be tidied up on the
Monday 6th when Vicky returns from holiday and we can submit.
I believe Working Group Last Call does not mean we can't make any
more changes. You'll have seen (and some of you have lived) the
changes to DLEP as it went through and following the last call
period. We still haven't had a great deal of feedback from the
working group which means they're either busy, don't have an
opinion, or are ok with it, but regardless we still need to plough on and
Prague.Details can still be worked on, and indeed I was just discussing
with Vicky the prospect of an author team call while most of us are at
can change things.So the two topics are gateways and routes to neighbours.
I'm not going to direct the outcome, that wouldn't be fair, but I
need you all to come to a position of "good enough for now", to
arrive at a document that we can all defend at Prague, and that
position needs to be arrived at by the time mentioned above. This
may mean each of you need to concede on certain points of detail,
perhaps against your better judgement, but it won't be the last time we
I'm really pleased with the progress, we have come a long way. Let's_____________________________________________________
work together to get these last points agreed (for now) and written up.
Thanks and Best Regards
John
This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains
information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary and/or
confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in
error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this
email in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains
information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary
and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email
in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
_____________________________________________________
