[antispam-f] Re: New spam technique
- From: Harriet Bazley <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:44:42 +0100
On 4 Oct 2006 as I do recall,
Dave Barnett wrote:
> In a recent message Harriet Bazley=20
> <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>=20
> > A new type of spam is making its way past Antispam - and past
> > Spamstamp's subsequent filtering - by posing as mailing list traffic:=
> >=20
> > [snip]
> >=20
> Have you had many of these? SpamStamp may need to see a few before=20
> it picks up this new genre.
>=20
I suspect it will take an awful lot to counterbalance 682 'ham'
occurrences of the 'mailing-list' header, given that all the bogus list
addresses are different... but we'll see.
<checks today's spambin haul>
Oh, it has! :-)
*spamstamp -check RAM::RamDisc0.$.Message9 -verbose
1 :99.90% : 28 : clisk
2 :99.90% : 12 : mx-man
3 :99.90% : 12 : worldgain
4 :99.90% : 12 : i'n'c'h'e's
5 :99.90% : 12 : noticable
6 :98.58% : 13 : studied
7 :98.58% : 13 : we=92ll
8 :2.68% : 1266 : precedence
9 :97.20% : 7 : received-spf
10 :96.65% : 6 : ezmlm
11 :96.16% : 16 : satisfaction
12 :4.06% : 824 : list-unsubscribe
13 :4.22% : 1266 : mailing
14 :4.47% : 746 : bulk
15 :4.60% : 3184 : list
Spam!
Score: 100.00%
*
--=20
Harriet Bazley =3D=3D Loyaulte me lie =3D=3D
Many are called, few are chosen. Fewer still get to do the choosing.
Other related posts:
