[antispam-f] Re: Development version

  • From: Martin <freelists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:40:12 +0100

On 04 Jun, in article <9901745653.Brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
   Brian Howlett <brian.groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now running 1.64 and have the weight rule active. Now I just need some 
> spam to test it on...

The PlusNet type problem is provoked by *any* email, not just SPAM!
  
For SPAM, I have run with Delete Weight > 30 towards the top of my rules
and Divert Weight > 9 as very low priority.

Using Divert is an easy way of testing, though.

Martin

-- 
Martin Avison      using a British Iyonix running RISC OS 5 
                   and the Pluto mail and newsreader

Other related posts: