Starting to shape up! nice.
I am thinking about graphics, these might be helpful for some points
Kind Regards,
P. Aibéo
[Ph.D.c, B.Sc. M.Sc. Dipl. Ing. Architecture, B.Sc. M.Sc. Civil Engineering]
Architectural Design <http://www.aibeo.com/> + Architectural Democracy
<http://architecturaldemocracy.com/> + Cidadania Theatre Group
<http://cidadania.de/> + World Music School <http://worldmusic.school/> +
Homebound <http://www.homebound.info/> + Croquis Nights
<http://croquisnights.com/>
Viipurinkatu 8B LH7 : 00510 Helsinki : Finland : +358458706603
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Tomi Astikainen <astikainentomi@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi,
When you've collected and edited everything you wish to say, I can then
help write the final manifesto, or at least proofread it.
Love from Benin,
Tomi
On Apr 2, 2016 3:39 PM, "Pekka Nikander" <pekka.nikander@xxxxxx> wrote:
There is now a Google Docs outline for a "White paper". I transferred
the ownership to you Ruby so that you can freely add new editors (and throw
me out if you are unhappy with that I do. :-)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PYUb4H7PgnIyzFXVs0z62hI71AAqZhfYfAcZTOYr3Ss
Anyone can make comments on it. Currently only Ruby and I can edit it,
as I didn't know the Google account for anyone else.
I'm afraid the outline may still be too lofty to be a starting point for
a manifesto.
Well, I presume I may be too much an academic to really be able to write
a manifesto anyway. Therefore it may be better (at least for me) to first
write a white paper and then condense a manifesto out of that, leaving
"unessential" discussion and argumentation away. Anyway, a white paper
should be easy to understand, too, even though addressed to a different
audience.
Mostly I think we (or I) can make the argumentation relatively solid, but
I'm afraid at least I am not able to complete the section about
demontisation and communisation, as they go beyond my current understanding.
Personally I tend to believe in Graeber's distinction between
"proto-communism" in the small and under exceptional circumstances and
selfishness towards strangers under most other situations. As the
"capitalist" in my ego is reluctant to directly give to every beggar and
instead wants to change the system (which is why I'm here in the first
place), I have quite a hard time believing in communism beyond Dunbar's
number.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/comments/401o92/david_graeber_we_are_all_communists/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar%27s_number
But I digress.
My plan is to next start adding there some references, and maybe write
some text for Appendix A.
--Pekka
