On 05.08.2010 00:28, Trevor Scroggins wrote:
Sounds reasonable. Did we rename libgcc_s.so to libgcc.so to provide a shared libgcc that "just works" (unless you're using libtool) without having to understand gcc's link specs, or was there more to it than that?
To be honest, I don't know. I don't think I have done anything like that in any GCC I built, but then, I don't know whether it included a libgcc.so at all.
Regards, -- Hans-Joerg Frieden Now these points of data make a beautiful line, and we're out of beta, we're releasing on time. -- ______________________________________________________________________________ Amiga Development tools ML - //www.freelists.org/list/adtools Homepage...................: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/adtools Listserver help............: mailto:adtools-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=HELP