[adtools] Re: Possible binutils problem
- From: Johan Gill <johane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: adtools@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:48:23 +0200
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 09:02:36AM +0200, Jens Langner wrote:
>
> I have tried it with 2.16 some month ago, but it also failed and
> adapting it wasn't _that_ easy so that I dropped the idea of updating it
> at that time. However, IMHO an updated binutils 2.17 build is really
> required and I would love to see someone taking the job and porting our
> 2.14 patches to the 2.17 releases of binutils. I am currently way too
> busy, especially because I still need to get that gcc 4.1 patches finished.
>
> So anyone brave enough to try to get 2.17 of binutils running with our
> OS4/OS3/MOS changes?
>
I am going that way, via 2.15, but only with the OS4 changes.
gas compiles nicely here, but ld needs more work.
--
Johan Gill, johane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
______________________________________________________________________________
Amiga Development tools ML - //www.freelists.org/list/adtools
Homepage...................: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/adtools
Listserver help............: mailto:adtools-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=HELP
Other related posts:
