[adtools] Re: Possible binutils problem
- From: Jens Langner <Jens.Langner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: adtools@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 10:57:47 +0200
Johan Gill schrieb:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 09:02:36AM +0200, Jens Langner wrote:
>> I have tried it with 2.16 some month ago, but it also failed and
>> adapting it wasn't _that_ easy so that I dropped the idea of updating it
>> at that time. However, IMHO an updated binutils 2.17 build is really
>> required and I would love to see someone taking the job and porting our
>> 2.14 patches to the 2.17 releases of binutils. I am currently way too
>> busy, especially because I still need to get that gcc 4.1 patches finished.
>>
>> So anyone brave enough to try to get 2.17 of binutils running with our
>> OS4/OS3/MOS changes?
>>
>
> I am going that way, via 2.15, but only with the OS4 changes.
>
> gas compiles nicely here, but ld needs more work.
Ok, let us know how you proceed and provide us a diff file against the
official 2.15/2.17 binutils sources as soon as you think your changes
work as expected. I will then review your changes and see if I can
incorporate them into our adtools repository.
cheers,
jens
--
Jens Langner Ph: +49-172-4452254
Rißweg 27b
01324 Dresden Jens.Langner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Germany http://www.jens-langner.de/
______________________________________________________________________________
Amiga Development tools ML - //www.freelists.org/list/adtools
Homepage...................: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/adtools
Listserver help............: mailto:adtools-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=HELP
Other related posts:
