Any time the word "CODE" is used it usually refers to government or it's
employees, not HUMANS, article 4 Citizens.
On Thursday, December 31, 2020, 2:27:18 PM CST, Rick Miller
<ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Maybe I missed it, but it seems to me this code section would be relevant to
the IRS fraud. Your thoughts?
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 11:38 AM Gary Edwards <motodoc1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Oh, now I get it. Thanks for the education. I have read 15 USC 17 and am on the
same page….
Your contributions, make us all better, keep up the great work!!! Iron sharpens
iron!!!!
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>On Behalf Of veritas
ghost
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2020 5:56 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: for review to those
interested SOVEREIGNTY
just so you know gary, i wasnt sayin anythin bad or against you. in case you
havent i would look at 15 usc 17, i think you will pick up quickly on why what
you said made me think of it
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020, 6:58 AM Gary Edwards <motodoc1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I feel the need to clarify the mis-understanding again...I do not wish to
profit from others, but I do not wish for others to profit at my expense and
detriment, without just compensation, especially government and court entities.
From:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of veritas
ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 6:51 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: for review to those
interested SOVEREIGNTY
we shouldnt mix things, but since i seen a comment about profiting at the
expense of others. i thought people might find 15 usc 17 funny
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020, 3:48 PM Ray Greninger <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I hear you.
On Tuesday, December 29, 2020, 2:31:03 PM MST, Gary Edwards
<motodoc1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No, you misunderstand my statement. I want to benefit from my own pledged
labor, not having it stolen from me and the benefits of my family.
From:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>On Behalf Of Ray
Greninger
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:24 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: for review to those
interested SOVEREIGNTY
So you want to benefit from the pledged labor of others?
On Tuesday, December 29, 2020, 1:54:25 PM MST, Gary Edwards
<motodoc1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Agreed, if anyone associated with the “Pay-ti-idiot” movement (whatever that
is?) agrees that much of what is stated is true and even provable.
How we, as the subject of the TRUST can benefit as everyone else does off our
pledged future labor is the crux of the matter!
If anyone has insight into factual routes, I’m all ears.
Much of the effort is conjecture, theory and fraught with peril when done wrong.
I am interested in the truth and the truth will be the same for everyone, and
re-producable.
From:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>On Behalf Of Charley
Dan
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 10:17 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: for review to those
interested SOVEREIGNTY
I disagree with the solution. Seen this passed around many times. People who
claim they have done it. But no claims to effectiveness. Can some one step
forward to claim it works and little insight to how it works?
On Dec 29, 2020, 8:59 AM -0700, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>, wrote:
https://politicalvelcraft.org/2013/02/10/we-the-people-of-the-united-states-must-assert-our-sovereignty/
