TRANSformers: the hunt for pussiman217 (7 sec)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=x6Wu9pJr-88
WHEN YOU HAVE TO ROB THE BANK TO GET YOUR OWN MONEY (its not illegal its
called you signed a contract where you give them your "money", they owe you
what you deposit, and if they do whats called a bail in you more than
likely agreed to it when you signed those papers when you opened a account
there. do i agree with it no but if its what you signed up for. there might
be a couple of ways to wiggle out of that but thats getting into more than
i plan to in this post. this is why its good to know law so you know ways
around using regular means of banking or barter, like knowing fed notes
discharge and dont pay as well as things like silver or gold contracts etc.
16:52)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=NvegKDrvybk
CLOSING BANKS DOWN FOR A WEEK? (12:16)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PURtIpn38w0E/
Joe Biden Takes Off For Another Weekend Vacation in Delaware – Biden Has
Spent 40% of His Presidency on Vacation with No Visitor Logs (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/joe-biden-takes-off-another-weekend-vacation-delaware-biden-spent-40-presidency-vacation-no-visitor-logs-video/
The Great Cornholio (2:35)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=lHQrrHRho2Y
Fetterman Agrees “LGBTQ Education” Should be “Mandatory” For Children in
All Schools (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/democrat-fetterman-agrees-lgbtq-education-mandatory-children-schools-video/
BAPHOMET LADYBOY GAGA "MY FANS DON'T CARE IF I HAVE A PENIS" (25 sec)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/OAP0mI05TW2m/
Woke Air Force Academy Diversity Training Tells Cadets: ‘Stop Saying Mom
and Dad’, ‘Don’t Call a Terrorist a Terrorist’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/woke-air-force-academy-diversity-training-tells-cadets-stop-saying-mom-dad-dont-call-terrorist-terrorist/
UN military movement East UK (Thetford) (45 sec)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=dREd4U6cam0&feature=youtu.be
A 24 YEAR OLD MCDONALD'S HAMBURGER. READY TO EAT (57 sec)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/26rUj2qRagdv/
Newsom’s 10-Year Plan to End Homelessness Sounds Great – But This Video Is
from 2008
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/newsoms-10-year-plan-end-homelessness-sounds-great-video-2008/
Chaos Erupts as Large Group of Juveniles Brazenly Loot and Destroy Wawa
Food Market in Philadelphia (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/chaos-erupts-large-group-juveniles-brazenly-loots-destroys-wawa-food-market-philadelphia-video/
Seattle’s Chinatown community fighting back after proposed $22M homeless
megaplex in neighbourhood (8:47)
https://rumble.com/v1ldf2x-seattles-chinatown-community-fighting-back-after-proposed-22m-homeless-mega.html
Beavis takes Butt-head's order (2:06)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=lvv6tkGANdw
MASSIE MASTERFULLY EXPOSES THE STRANGE CASE OF THE ELUSIVE MR. EPPS (8:20)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4WFoH56HMEE/
Tyrant Trudeau Sends His Support to Iranian Freedom Protesters After
Trampling Peaceful Canadian Seniors on Horseback
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/wow-tyrant-trudeau-sends-support-iranian-freedom-protesters-trampling-peaceful-canadian-seniors-horseback-sitdownjustin/
who are the uk’s most wanted covid crooks? (17:02)
https://odysee.com/@ceylon:1/...who-are-the-uk%E2%80%99s-most-wanted-covid-crooks:c
Nicaragua Government Removes CNN en Español from the Country for Allegedly
“Violating and Injuring the Legal Norms” (i would have to look deeper
before i put this in the good section but from the seems of it to dunk on
cnn it should be there.)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/nicaragua-government-removes-cnn-en-espanol-country-violating-injuring-legal-norms/
240 Pound Plus-Size Model Scores Exclusive in ‘Women’s Health’ Magazine –
Was Recently Refused Ride at Horse Farm Due to Weight Limit
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/peak-2020-240-pound-plus-size-model-scores-exclusive-womens-health-magazine-recently-refused-ride-horse-farm-due-weight-limit/
Beavis & Butthead do Call of Duty Modern Warfare Proxy Drones (5:15)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=kx-7YurGKCU
HARVARD STUDY: JAB AND BOOSTERS ARE 98 TIMES WORSE THAN CONVIDZ. (9:21)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Jw4ufxzRR53/
The American Red Cross: We Dont Label Blood Products As Containing
Vaccinated or Unvaccinated Blood As Containing Vaccinated or Unvaccinated
Blood
https://odysee.com/@Starseed:6/The-American-Red-Cross-We-Dont-Label-Blood-Products-As-Containing-Vaccinated-or-Unvaccinated-Blood:1
They will tell us that the mRNA (which is not a part of it) altered the
neurons (3:40)
https://odysee.com/@laquintacolumnainternational:7/They-will-tell-us-that-the-mRNA-which-is-not-a-part-of-it-altered-the-neurons:5
Woman Dies Suddenly Inside the Pharmacy 15 Minutes After Getting a Booster
Shot
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/woman-dies-suddenly-inside-pharmacy-15-minutes-getting-booster-shot/
Beavis takes Butt-head's order (1:01)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=5r5GdTfq-ic
Canadian charity ‘The Democracy Fund’ takes on legal battle of unvaccinated
B.C. pediatrician (20:18)
https://rumble.com/v1ld7iz-canadian-charity-the-democracy-fund-takes-on-legal-battle-of-unvaccinated-b.html
Quadruple Vaxxed Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla Tests Positive for COVID Again
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/just-quadruple-vaxxed-pfizer-ceo-albert-bourla-tests-positive-covid/
Beavis and Butthead - Cash Machine (59 sec)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=5WSTOwWMx-s
Leftists To Protest Arizona Judge’s Ruling On Arizona Abortion Ban – Lifts
Planned Parenthood’s Injunction – Abortion In Arizona Is Now ILLEGAL
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/leftists-protest-arizona-judges-ruling-arizona-abortion-ban-lifts-planned-parenthoods-injunction-abortion-arizona-now-illegal/
Inspector General’s Office: Denial of Service Members’s Religious Exemption
Requests For Vaccine Refusal Violates Federal Law (dericious. to barrow
this phrase again, no shit bat man.)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/inspector-general-office-denial-service-memberss-religious-exemption-requests-vaccine-refusal-violates-federal-law/
My Unbelievable Interview with Biden (8:47)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Fyoi77J65-A
When you’re a sigma male…
https://youtube.com/shorts/b-FN-2PVAxc
We both know what need to happen (1:44)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=C2NTQIlTBMQ
White House Interpreter (parody) (14 sec)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=2P2dCpwtMNo
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/deoxy.org/fz2/11.htm
Justice KENNEDY (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the Court: The text and history of the Eleventh Amendment also suggest
that Congress acted not to change but to restore the original
constitutional design. Although earlier drafts of the Amendment had been
phrased as express limits on the judicial power granted in Article III,
see, e.g., 3 Annals of Congress 651-652 (1793) ("The Judicial Power of the
United States shall not extend to any suits in law or equity, commenced or
prosecuted against one of the United States ..."), the adopted text
addressed the proper interpretation of that provision of the original
Constitution, see U.S. Const., Amdt. 11 ("The Judicial power of the United
States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity,
commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States ..."). By its
terms, then, the Eleventh Amendment did not redefine the federal judicial
power but instead overruled the Court: "This amendment, expressing the will
of the ultimate sovereignty of the whole country, superior to all
legislatures and all courts, actually reversed the decision of the Supreme
Court. ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706
joseph story opinion of the court: It is the more rational to suppose that
the courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and
the legislature in order, among other things, to keep the latter within the
limits assigned to their authority.
Federalist, No. 77, by Hamilton.
"Nor does the conclusion by any means suppose a superiority of the judicial
to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is
superior to both, LUTHER v. BORDEN, 48 U.S. 1 (1849)
236 OorwoR, J., [connor, j ?] dissenting: When an unusual or extraordinary
power is asserted by the government, or unusual and extraordinary method,
contrary to the procedure and course of the common law, is prescribed by
which the right of the citizen, either in respect to his person or
property, is invaded, every reasonable doubt must be construed against the
asserted power and mode of procedure and in favor of the right of the
citizen to demand that he be tried by due course of law. As in England, all
language in grants are to be construed most strongly in favor of the King,
so in North Carolina all such language must be construed most strongly in
favor of the people — the sovereigns. Daniels v. Homer, 139 N.C. 219 (1905)
ERVIN, Chief Justice (dissenting): The people reserve to themselves the
power to propose laws and amendments to the Constitution, * * *. This power
so reserved to the people should not be crippled, avoided, or denied by
technical construction by the courts. It is the duty of the courts to
construe and preserve this right as intended by the people in adopting the
Constitution and thereby reserve unto the people this power.' Adams v.
Gunter, 238 So. 2d 824 238 So.2d 824 (1970)
DENT, P. (Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia): The word "state" is
generally used to denote three different things, and often without
discrimination: First, the territory within its jurisdiction; second, the
government or governmental agencies appointed to carry out the will of the
people; and, third, the people in their sovereign capacity. The state is
not the sovereign in this country. The people who make it are sovereign,
and all its officers are but their servants. RALSTON v. TOWN OF WESTON,
46 W.Va. 544 (1899)
Justice SOUTER, STEVENS, GINSBURG, and BREYER (Supreme Court of the United
States, 1999) join, dissenting:
"[***] The principle is, that all human law must be prescribed by a
superior. [***]
The sovereign, when traced to his source, must be found in the man." Id.,
at 458. 1 Blackstone Commentaries. pp 241, 242. ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S.
706 (1999)
Chief Justice Fuller (Supreme Court of the U.S.) concurr Harlan, Brewer,
and Peckham, dissenting: Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to
law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while
sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty
itself remainswith the people, by whom and for whom all government exists
and acts. DOWNES v. BIDWELL, 182 U.S.244(1901)
Justice KENNEDY (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the Court:
Although the Constitution begins with the principle that sovereignty rests
with the people, it does not follow that the National Government becomes
the ultimate, preferred mechanism for expressing the people's will. ALDEN
v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706 (1999).
Justice STEWART (Supreme Court of the United States) concurring:
We tend to overlook the basic political and legal reality that the people,
not the bureaucracy, are the sovereign. Our Federal Government was created
for the security and happiness of the people. Executives, lawmakers, and
members of the Judiciary are inferior in the sense that they are in office
only to carry out and execute the constitutional regime. The Preamble of
the Constitution states that 'We the people' ordained and established the
Constitution. The Declaration of Independence stated that to insure
'certain unalienable Rights,' 'Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed' and 'That
whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is
the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.' SCHLESINGER v.
RESERVISTS Committee, 418 U.S. 208(1974)
Justice SOUTER, Justice GINSBURG and Justice BREYER (Supreme Court of the
United States) join, concurring:
U.S. Const., Art. VI ("This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States
... shall be the supreme Law of the Land"). VERIZON MARYLAND v. PUBLIC
SERV. COM. 535 U.S. 635 (2002). [see also: Eagle v. State, 153 P.3d 976,
Supreme Court of Alaska (2007)]
Justice KENNEDY (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the Court:
"And, first, the law ascribes to the king the attribute of sovereignty, or
pre-eminence... . Hence it is, that no suit or action can be brought
against the king, even in civil matters, because no court can have
jurisdiction over him. For all jurisdiction implies superiority of power
...." 1 Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England pp 234-235 (1765).
ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706 (1999)
Justice SOUTER STEVENS,GINSBURG,and Justice BREYER join, dissenting:Chief
Justice Jay took a less vehement tone in his opinion, but he, too,
deniedthe applicability of the doctrine of sovereign immunity to the
States. He explained the doctrine as an incident of European feudalism, and
said that by contrast, "[n]o such ideas obtain here; at the Revolution, the
sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of
the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects and have none to
govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equalas fellow citizens,
and as joint tenants in the sovereignty." ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706
(1999)
HODGES, Justice (Supreme Court of Oklahoma) dissenting:
In an old English legal commentary (I Blackstone Commentaries. 242) the
basis for the doctrine was explained: '*** no suit or action can be brought
against the King, even in civil matters, because no court can have
jurisdiction over him. For all jurisdiction implies superiority of power.
Authority to try would be vain and idle, without an authority to redress;
and the sentence of a court would be contemptible, unless that court had
power to command the execution of it; but who, says Finch, shall command
the King.' NEWMAN v. The STATE of Oklahoma ex rel, 1971 OK 84 (1971). [See
all jurisdiction implies superiority: Muni v. Hart, 6 La.Ann. 570 (1851);
MAURAN v. SMITH, 8 R.I. 192 (1865); STATE v. FLETCHER, 39 Mo. 388 (1867);
STATE v. TOWN COUNCIL, 18 R.I. 258 (1893); STATE v. STONE, 120 Mo. 428
(1894); ELLINGHAM Sec. of St v. DYE, 178 Ind. 336 (1912); STATE v. HEDRICK,
294 Mo. 21 (1922); DRIGGS v. UTAH TEACHERS, 105 Utah 417 (1943); NEITING v.
BLONDELL, 306 Minn. 122 (1975)]
When the Gas Fumes hit (1:01)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=x0N1dk0cbkM
