The right of property has been described as a fundamental, natural,
inherent, and inalienable right. It is sometimes characterized judicially
as a sacred right, the protection of which is one of the most important
objects of government. Wadsworth v. State, 275 Mont 287, 911 P.2d 1165
(1996) Buskey v. Town of Hanover, 133 N.H. 318, 577 A.2d 406 (1990)
Justice GRAY (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion of
the court: The sovereignty has been transferred from one man to the
collective body of the people - and he who before was a "subject of the
king" is now "a citizen of the State." (State v. Manuel, 20 N.C. 144
(1838)) U.S. v. WONG KIM, 169 U.S. 649 [see also Harper v. Hall
2022-NCSC-17]
COX, Chief Justice (Supreme Court of Indiana): A "Constitution" is
legislation direct from the people acting in their sovereign capacity,
while a "statute" is legislation from their representatives, subject to
limitations prescribed by the superior authority. People v. May, 3 Mich.
598. [***] The Legislature, acting outside of the Constitution, is without
jurisdiction and its action null." ELLINGHAM v. DYE et al, 178 Ind. 336
(1912).
JOSEPH STORY (supreme Court of the United States) Mr. Webster, on the same
side: The people here are as sovereign as the crowned heads at Laybach ...
the following view was urged, when the adoption of the Constitution was
under consideration:--'It is the more rational to suppose that the courts
were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the
legislature, in order, among other things, to keep the latter within the
limits assigned to their authority.' (Federalist, No. 77, by Hamilton.)
'Nor does the conclusion by any means suppose a supe
riority of the judicial to the legislative power. It only supposes that the
power of the people is superior to both,' &c., &c. LUTHER v. BORDEN, 48
U.S. 1 (1849)
but sovereignty survives. A political society cannot endure without a
supreme will somewhere. Sovereignty is never held in suspense. When,
therefore, the external sovereignty of Great Britain in respect of the
colonies ceased, it immediately passed to the Union. See Penhallow v.
Doane, 3 Dall. 54, 80, 81, Fed.Cas. No. 10925. That fact was given
practical application almost at once. The treaty of peace, made on
September 3, 1783, was concluded between his Brittanic Majesty and the
'United States of America.' 8 Stat., European Treaties, 80.
The Union existed before the Constitution, which was ordained and
established among other things to form 'a more perfect Union.' Prior to
that event, it is clear that the Union, declared by the Articles of
Confederation to be 'perpetual,' was the sole possessor of external
sovereignty, and in the Union it remained without change save in so far as
the Constitution in express terms qualified its exercise. The Framers'
Convention was called and exerted its powers upon the irrefutable postulate
that though the states were several their people in respect of foreign
affairs were one. UNITED STATES v. CURTISS, 299 U.S. 304 (1936)
GIBSON, Chief Justice (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania) opinion of the Court:
"Every highway, toll or free, is licensed, constructed, and regulated by
the immediate or delegated action of the sovereign power, and in every
commonwealth the people in the aggregate constitute the sovereign. But it
is the prerogative of a sovereign to be exempt from coercion by action, for
jurisdiction implies sovereignty, and a sovereign can have no superior.".
O'Connor v. Pittsburgh, 18 Pa. 187 (1851). (Same in 42 Pa.C.C. 579 (1914)).
Justice KENNEDY (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the Court: "And, first, the law ascribes to the kin
g the attribute of sovereignty, or pre-eminence... .Hence it is, that no
suit or action can be brought against the king, even in civil matters,
because no court can have jurisdiction over him. For all jurisdiction
implies superiority of power ...." 1 Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws
of England pp 234-235 (1765). ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706
justice thomas dissent: The Constitution limited but did not abolish the
sovereign powers of the States, which retained `a residuary and inviolable
sovereignty.' The Federalist No. 39, p. 245 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961). Thus,
both the Federal Government and the States wield sovereign powers, and that
is why our system of government is said to be one of `dual sovereignty.'
Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452, 457 [111 S.Ct. 2395, 115 L.Ed.2d 410]
(1991)." Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn., 584 U.S. ___, ___,
138 S.Ct. 1461, 1475, 200 L.Ed.2d 854 (2018). ...But there is a difference
between the whole and a single part, and that difference underlies
decisions as foundational to our legal system as McCulloch v. Maryland, 4
Wheat. 316, 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819). There, in terms so directly relevant as to
seem presciently tailored to answer this very objection, Chief Justice
Marshall distinguished precisely between "the people of a State" and "[t]he
people of all the States," id., at 428, 435; between the "sovereignty which
the people of a single state possess"...Stare decisis has its pedigree in
the unwritten common law of England...Justice GINSBURG, dissenting: In the
system established by the Federal Constitution, however, "ultimate
sovereignty" resides in the governed [should say "the people" but close
enough]. Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting
Comm'n, 576 U.S. ___, ___, 135 S.Ct. 2652, 2675, 192 L.Ed.2d 704 (2015);
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, 324-325, 4 L.Ed. 97 (1816); Braun,
supra, at 26-30. Insofar as a crime offends the "peace and dignity" of a
sovereign, Lanza, 260 U.S. at 382,
43 S.Ct. 141, that "sovereign" is the people, the "original fountain of all
legitimate authority," The Federalist No. 22, at 152 (A. Hamilton); see
Note, Double Prosecution by State and Federal Governments: Another *1991
Exercise in Federalism, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1538, 1542 (1967). gamble v us
(2019).
ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.: ...“unite[d],
as various particulars, into one mass or body,” “br[ought] together in
close union,” or “combine[d].” Yet all agree that entry into our Union “by
no means implies the loss of distinct and individual existence . . . by the
States.” Texas v. White, 7 Wall. 700, 725 (1869)." hall v hall 584 U. S.
____ (2018)
Justice O'CONNOR (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the Court: As every schoolchild learns, our Constitution establishes a
system of dual sovereignty between the States and the Federal Government.
This Court also has recognized this fundamental principle. In Tafflin v.
Levitt, 493 U.S. 455, 458 (1990), "[w]e beg[a]n with the axiom that, under
our federal system, the States possess sovereignty concurrent with that of
the Federal Government, subject only to limitations imposed by the
Supremacy Clause." Over 120 years ago, the Court described the
constitutional scheme of dual sovereigns: " '[T]he people of each State
compose a State, having its own government, and endowed with all the
functions essential to separate and independent existence,'... '[W]ithout
the States in union, there could be no such political body as the United
States.' GREGORY v. ASHCROFT, 501 U.S. 452
Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India, 434 U.S. 308...USOYAN v REPUBLIC OF
TURKEY 6 F.4th 31 (July 27, 2021)
Anderson v. Trustees of the California State University 3:19-cv-06997
(action brought for damages under 42 usc 1983 for both statutory and
constitutional damages against mainly the cops. ended with a 25k settlement
in favor of anderson.)
Private Attorney General
A private citizen who commences a lawsuit to enforce a legal [or lawful]
right that benefits the community as a whole [with the power of the
attorney general. CARDINALE, v. KEANE, CARDINALE, v. JONES et al. Nos.
A21A1718, A21A1719 [[February 15, 2022]].
West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale
Group, Inc.
What Are Private Attorneys General?
By: Robert J. Nahoum [tristate area lawyer]
...A private right of action simply empowers private attorneys [or private
citizens] to do whatever the Attorneys General are authorized to do. Thus,
we have the Private Attorneys General.
the PAGA gives a private citizen the right to pursue fines that would
normally only be available to the State of California. As such, it is truly
allowing a private citizen to act as an attorney general. Cal. Lab. Code §
2699(a). [michael tracy california attorney]
18 U.S.C. § 1962(c). The statute "provides a private civil action to
recover treble damages for injury `by reason of a violation of' its
substantive provisions." Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., 473 U.S. 479, 481,
105 S.Ct. 3275, 87 L.Ed.2d 346 (1985)
2nd
Although statutory standing involves an inquiry into alleged injury, it is
not synonymous with Article III standing. Instead, a motion to dismiss for
lack of statutory standing is analyzed under Rule 12(b)(6), not Rule
12(b)(1). Cox, Cox, Filo, Camel & Wilson, L.L.C. v. Sasol N. Am., Inc., 544
F. App'x 455, 457 n.8 (5th Cir. 2013) (mem.); Arroyo v. Oprona, Inc., 736
F. App'x 427, 429 (5th Cir. 2018) (per curiam); see DeMauro v. DeMauro, 115
F.3d 94, 96 (1st Cir. 1997); In re Schering-Plough Corp. Intron/Temodar
Consumer Class Action, 678 F.3d 235, 243 (3d Cir. 2012); see also Canyon
Cnty. v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc., 519 F.3d 969, 974 n.7 (9th Cir. 2008)
("[T]he question of statutory standing [under RICO] is to be resolved under
Rule 12(b)(6), once Article III standing has been established." (citation o
mitted)).
HCB FINANCIAL CORP v McPHERSON 8 F.4th 335 (2021)
Soler v. County of San Diego
Case No. 14cv2470-MMA [an example of how to appeal and successfully get
attorney fees if your denied first instance.] (05-19-2021)
The decision that came closest to addressing the issue at hand is the Sixth
Circuit's en banc opinion in United States v. Thompson, 685 F.2d 993 (6th
Cir.1982). There the court held that "The Office of the Governor" could be
the enterprise in a RICO prosecution. Id. at 998-1000. ...We also agree
with the Sixth Circuit's ultimate conclusion that the prosecution's
approach to this issue in cases such as Thompson and the case at hand may
often not be absolutely necessary under RICO, but it is not forbidden.
...In these unusual circumstances, comity interests do not override the
broad language of RICO, as interpreted in Turkette. The district court did
not err by allowing the state to be the RICO enterprise in this RICO
conspiracy prosecution. US v. Warner, 498 F. 3d 666 (2007) [theres nothin i
can do bout that number being there. i dont like it either but not much i
can do bout it since its part of the case cite.]
(3) a reasonable attorney's
fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred." Id. § 2707(b). The
subsection on damages provides that "[i]n the case of a successful action
to enforce liability under this section, the court may assess the costs of
the action, together with reasonable attorney fees determined by the
court." Id. § 2707(c) (emphasis added).
"May" is a word of discretion. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517, 533
(1994). DOMAIN PROTECTION, L.L.C. v SEA WASP No. 20-40411, Consolidated
with No. 20-40518. (January 13, 2022)
The Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U. S. C. § 505, provides in relevant part
that in any copyright infringement action "the court may . . . award a
reasonable attorney's fee to the prevailing party as part of the costs."
Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517, 533 (1994)
To establis
h standing to bring
a claim for relief, a party must show (1) that their interests are
"`arguably within the zone of interests to be protected or regulated by the
statute or constitutional guarantee in question'" and (2) that they have
suffered or will suffer an "`injury in fact'" or a specific and perceptible
harm. Save a Valuable Env't v. City of Bothell, 89 Wn.2d 862, 866, 576 P.2d
401 (1978) (quoting Ass'n of Data Processing Serv. Orgs., Inc. v. Camp, 397
U.S. 150, 153, 152, 90 S. Ct. 827, 25 L. Ed. 2d 184 (1970)) (addressing
prerequisites to common law standing). Similarly, to obtain declaratory
relief under the ) Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act (UDJA), ch. 7.24 RCW,
a plaintiff must show a justiciable controversy. A justiciable controversy
is
"(1) ... an actual, present and existing dispute, or the mature seeds of
one, as distinguished from a possible, dormant, hypothetical, speculative,
or moot disagreement, (2) between parties having genuine and opposing
interests, (3) which involves interests that must be direct and
substantial, rather than potential, theoretical, abstract or academic, and
(4) a judicial determination of which will be final and conclusive." To
-
Ro Trade Shows v Collins, 144 Wn.2d 403, 411, 27 P.3d 1149 (2001) (emphasis
added) (alteration in original) (quoting Diversified Indus. Dev. Corp. v.
Ripley, 82 Wn.2d 811, 815, 514 P.2d 137 (1973)). These UDJA prerequisites
encompass the common law prerequisites to standing. Id. at 414. Williams v.
City of Spokane No. 99071-9 (March 3, 2022)
A person or a family may have a spiritual stake in First Amendment values
sufficient to give standing to raise issues concerning the Establishment
Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. Abington School District v. Schempp,
374 U. S. v203. We mention these noneconomic values to emphasize that
standing may stem from them as well as from the economic injury on which
petitioners rely here. Certainly he who is "likely to be financially"
injured, FCC v
. Sanders Bros. Radio Stati
on, 309 U. S. 470, 477, may be a reliable private attorney general to
litigate the issues of the public interest in the present case. ASSOCIATION
OF DATA PROCESSING SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS v CAMP 397 U.S. 150 (1970)
The Rice family has cleared that hurdle too. Its procedural injury is tied
to the family's economic interest in developing its property. Such
"palpable economic injuries have long been recognized as sufficient to lay
the basis for standing." Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727, 733 (1972).
And without the P& Z Commission's approval, the family's development plans
could not proceed. So the Rice family is no bystander, asserting a mere
"interest in having the [proper] procedures observed." Lujan, 504 U.S. at
573 n.8. The family's application was subject to the P&Z Commission's
allegedly unconstitutional process and its outcome affected the family's
ability to develop its land. The Rice family has demonstrated
injury-in-fact. Rice v. VILLAGE OF JOHNSTOWN No. 21-3268. (April 8, 2022)
The object of civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to
turn them into prosecutors, "private attorneys general," dedicated to
eliminating racketeering activity. 3 Id., at 187 (citing Malley-Duff, 483
U.S., at 151 ) (civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose [of]
encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently to investigate"). The
provision for treble damages is accordingly justified by the expected
benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an object pursued the sooner
the better. Rotella v. Wood et al., 528 U.S. 549 (2000)
JOSEPHS v MARZAN Civil No. 21-0749 (JRT/DTS) (January 5, 2022)
Acts in excess of judicial authority constitutes misconduct, particularly
where a judge deliberately disregards the requirements of fairness and due
process. Cannon v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications, (1975) 14 Cal. 3d
678, 694. Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance, (1983) 33 Cal. 3d
359, 371, 374
A per curiam opinion of the federal Supreme Court then superimposed Judge
Frank's metaphor -- without crediting the author -- upon the award of an
attorney fee authorized by a federal statute. (Newman v. Piggie Park
Enterprises (1968) 390 U.S. 400, 402 [19 L.Ed. 2d 1263, 1265-1266, 88 S.Ct.
964]. Bradley v. Richmond School Board(1974) 416 U.S. 696, 719
40 L.Ed.2d 476, 492-493, 94 S.Ct. 2006
CRUMWELL v ROBERT A. SIEGEL AUCTION GALLERIES, INC. 1:21-cv-9585-VSB
(January 27, 2022)
ARIZONA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION v STATE OF ARIZONA, A BODY POLITIC
cv-21-0234-T/AP (January 6, 2022)
Earth Island Institute v. Brands Civil Action No. 21-2659 (JEB) (March 24,
2022)
State ex rel. Berger v McMONAGLE 82-1139 (July 13, 1983)
STATE OF NEBRASKA EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DISCIPLINE OF THE NEBRASKA SUPREME
COURT v KRATINA A-21-686 (March 25, 2022)
re ExxonMobil Corp., 635 S.W.3d 631 (2021)
In re ExxonMobil Oil Corporation 01-22-00088-CV (February 24, 2022)
IN RE RICHMOND Nos. 05-21-01068-CV, 05-21-01069-CV, 05-21-01070-CV.
(plaintiff failed to get his writ of mandamus in this case. but this shows
not only can random people be a private attorney general they can be a
relator still.)
STATE EX REL. FLUTY v. RAIFF 2021-1250
5 usc 3331, law of nations book 2 sec 132, 18 usc 112 [18 usc 1116(b)(4)],
15 usc 78u-3, 18 usc 912, 25 CFR 11.432, 10 usc 937 - Art. 137, 33 usc
1365, 42 usc 1983 [18 usc 242] [involving p.a.g Civil Rights Attorney's
Fees Act of 1976 42 usc 1981-1986 title IX of Public Law 92-318 [[20 U.S.C.
§§ 1681-1688]], or title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [[42 U.S.C. §§
2000d-2000d--4]], trezavant v city of tampa 741 f2d 336, case winnings some
might be interested in 15 usc 17], 18 usc 1968, 18 usc 1966, 28 usc 1919
[28 usc 2254], 18 usc 245, 18 usc 241, 33 usc 1316 [pub law 92-500, 33 usc
1319], 38 usc 7301, 33 usc 1251, 33 usc 1515, 42 usc 7604, 18 usc
1961-1968, 18 usc 1201, 18 usc 1203, 18 usc 2441, 18 usc 2331, 18 usc 2381,
18 usc ch 63 [one
in particular 18 usc 1349], 18 usc 24, 18 usc 178, 18 usc 111, 18 usc 118,
18 usc 246, 42 usc 1988 [42 usc 12205], 49 usc 30172, 18 usc 1512, 15 usc
2087, 5 usc 2302, 42 usc 12203, 18 usc 3071, some may be interested in 42
usc 2000cc [18 usc 247], 18 usc 248, revan-bennett act 2017 public law
53-1 sec 4, 26 usc 862, 28 usc 1746, 15 usc 7901 [for those of you that
dont know], 15 usc ch 9A [for those of you that think im weather crazy],
[some of you might also like] 15 usc 1692, 18 usc 2707, 31 usc 3730, 18 usc
1345, 18 usc 175, 20 usc 1682, 42 usc 2000d-7, 42 usc 408 (42 usc
408(a)(8)-42 usc 408(a)(9)), 5 usc 552, 5 usc 3333, 5 usc 7331, 18 usc ch
43, 38 usc 7331, 38 usc 731, 38 usc ch 31, federal rules of evidence rule
602, 33 usc 931,
CPS Targets Conservative Councilman: Martial Arts Injury Ends in Child
Abduction (sounds like another rico case. 14:33)
https://rumble.com/v14zjrt-cps-targets-conservative-councilman-martial-arts-injury-ends-in-child-abduc.html?mref=7ju1&mrefc=2
WEF-BACKED POLICIES CRIPPLING CANADIAN ENERGY POTENTIAL (6:02)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nVxn4zhYKk4/
Audio Leaked of Chinese Military Meeting Discussing the Invasion of Taiwan
and Defeat of Regional US Forces
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/exclusive-audio-leaked-chinese-military-meeting-discuss-invasion-taiwan-defeat-regional-us-forces/
MSNBC Does It Again – Pushes Fake Ukraine War Coverage – This Time Their
Expert Analyst Shares Video Game
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/msnbc-pushes-fake-ukraine-war-coverage-time-expert-analyst-shares-video-game/
Jeff Bezos Attacks Biden Administration on Inflation for the Second Time
Saying It’s most Hurtful to the Poor
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/jeff-bezos-attacks-biden-administration-inflation-second-time-saying-hurtful-poor/
TGP Warned for Years that China’s Economy Was Failing – This Is Now Evident
to the World and It Will Impact the US Greatly
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/tgp-warned-years-chinas-economy-failing-now-evident-world-will-impact-us-greatly/
US Gas Prices Reach ALL-TIME RECORD HIGH for SEVENTH STRAIGHT DAY — And Of
Course This is Ignored by Fake News Media
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/ignored-fake-news-media-gas-prices-reach-time-record-high-seventh-straight-day/
Baby Formula Maker Abbott Reaches Deal with FDA to Reopen Michigan Plant –
Could Take Two Months Before Product is Available on Shelves
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/baby-formula-maker-abbott-reaches-deal-fda-reopen-michigan-plant-take-two-months-product-available-shelves/
Chris Wray’s FBI Harassed Mother For Speaking Out at School Board Meeting
(Video)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/chris-wrays-fbi-harassed-mother-speaking-school-board-meeting/
Prenatal and Neonatal Infant Deaths Skyrocket Worldwide Since COVID-19
Vaccines Started (7:53)
https://odysee.com/@HealthImpactNews:1/babies-dying-covid-vaccines:d
Arizona Governor Doug Ducey Begins Bussing Illegal Aliens To Washington DC
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/arizona-governor-doug-ducey-begins-bussing-illegal-aliens-washington-dc/
This Is What an Wide Open Border Looks Like: Endless Stream of Illegals
Wade Across Rio Grande Unimpeded – The Uniparty Supports This
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/wide-open-border-looks-like-endless-stream-illegals-wade-across-rio-grande-unimpeded-uniparty-supports/
Arby’s Manager Admits Urinating ‘At Least Twice” in Milkshake Mix for His
Own “Sexual Gratification”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/arbys-manager-admits-urinating-least-twice-milkshake-mix-sexual-gratification/
It’s back (convidz cured the flu then for a couple of days putin cured
convidz. aint that somethin? 1:05)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/it%E2%80%99s-back:f
Get a better paid job, pleb (50 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/get-a-better-paid-job,-pleb!:5
Obama’s Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke Now Warning Of Coming Stagflation Under
Biden
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/obamas-fed-chairman-ben-bernanke-now-warning-coming-stagflation-biden/
Biden Secretly Orders U.S. Troops to Somalia, Reverses Trump Pull-Out
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/biden-secretly-orders-u-s-troops-somalia-reverses-trump-pull/
Obama Judge Allows Hillary and AOC Donors Into Jury Pool in Durham Case
Against Hillary Attorney Sussmann
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/outrageous-obama-judge-allows-hillary-aoc-donors-jury-pool-durham-case-hillary-attorney-sussmann/
Oregon To Allow Ballots 7 Days After Elections With New Postage Date Law
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/oregon-allow-ballots-7-days-elections-new-postage-date-law/
BRITS REACT TO SHOCKING PROPOSED EU 'CHAT CONTROL' SURVEILLANCE LEGISLATION
(5:40)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ouw5CP97b38/
Project Veritas: Senior Engineer Lashes Out at Elon Musk, Admits “Twitter
Does Not Believe in Free Speech,” – ‘We Are All Commie as F*ck’ (VIDEO)
(surprised? no one is.)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/project-veritas-senior-engineer-lashes-elon-musk-admits-twitter-not-believe-free-speech-commie-fck-video/
New Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Pfizer’s Covid-19 Vaccine Protection Against
Omicron Wanes Just a Week After Receiving Second and Third Dose
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/new-peer-reviewed-study-finds-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine-protection-omicron-wanes-just-week-receiving-second-third-dose/
When you have ZERO self-awareness (1:07)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/when-you-have-zero-self-awareness-3:e
https://t.me/marksteele5g/6671
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU TRY TO FORCE COVID TEST ANGRY, HUNGRY PEOPLE? YOU GET
THROWN OFF THE BUILDING (2:18)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/xXPScNikXZY2/
CONFIRMATION THE BBC ARE PUSHING DISINFORMATION FOR THE GLOBALIST
DEPOPULATION TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE COUNTRY - MAKE SURE THEY KNOW WE KNOW
https://www.saveusnow.org.uk/product/sun-t-shirt/ ;(7:28)
https://t.me/marksteele5g/6681
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Signs Bill Banning “Picketing and Protesting”
Outside a Private Home
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/florida-gov-ron-desantis-signs-bill-banning-picketing-protesting-outside-private-home/
JEREMY MADDOCK VACCINE PASSPORT CHALLENGE 05 13 2022 V3 (11:26)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kuLyMBvuiYk/
POLICE KNEW BUFFALO SHOOTER THREATENED TO SHOOT UP HIS SCHOOL LAST YEAR
(7:05)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NmmRhzu6sYbe/
If Shark Tank was Asian 2 (6:41)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=yEktiuOE-3o
