nsea .us, sovereigntyinternational .fyi, supremelaw .org, livefreenow .org,
https://understandcontractlawandyouwin .com/free-documents/,
https://bondsforthewin .com/, www.saveusnow .org .uk, goodf.forumotion
.com/t401-what-have-they-done-to-goodf?highlight=goodf,
Justice GRAY (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion of
the court: The sovereignty has been transferred from one man to the
collective body of the people - and he who before was a "subject of the
king" is now "a citizen of the State." (State v. Manuel, 20 N.C. 144
(1838)) U.S. v. WONG KIM, 169 U.S. 649 [see also Harper v. Hall
2022-NCSC-17]
justice thomas dissent: The Constitution limited but did not abolish the
sovereign powers of the States, which retained `a residuary and inviolable
sovereignty.' The Federalist No. 39, p. 245 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961). Thus,
both the Federal Government and the States wield sovereign powers, and that
is why our system of government is said to be one of `dual sovereignty.'
Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452, 457 [111 S.Ct. 2395, 115 L.Ed.2d 410]
(1991)." Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn., 584 U.S. ___, ___,
138 S.Ct. 1461, 1475, 200 L.Ed.2d 854 (2018). ...But there is a difference
between the whole and a single part, and that difference underlies
decisions as foundational to our legal system as McCulloch v. Maryland, 4
Wheat. 316, 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819). There, in terms so directly relevant as to
seem presciently tailored to answer this very objection, Chief Justice
Marshall distinguished precisely between "the people of a State" and "[t]he
people of all the States," id., at 428, 435; between the "sovereignty which
the people of a single state possess"...Stare decisis has its pedigree in
the unwritten common law of England...Justice GINSBURG, dissenting: In the
system established by the Federal Constitution, however, "ultimate
sovereignty" resides in the governed [should say "the people" but close
enough]. Arizona State Legislature v. Ar
izona
Independent Redistricting Comm'n, 576 U.S. ___, ___, 135 S.Ct. 2652, 2675,
192 L.Ed.2d 704 (2015); Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, 324-325, 4
L.Ed. 97 (1816); Braun, supra, at 26-30. Insofar as a crime offends the
"peace and dignity" of a sovereign, Lanza, 260 U.S. at 382, 43 S.Ct. 141,
that "sovereign" is the people, the "original fountain of all legitimate
authority," The Federalist No. 22, at 152 (A. Hamilton); see Note, Double
Prosecution by State and Federal Governments: Another *1991 Exercise in
Federalism, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1538, 1542 (1967). gamble v us (2019).
ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.: ...“unite[d],
as various particulars, into one mass or body,” “br[ought] together in
close union,” or “combine[d].” Yet all agree that entry into our Union “by
no means implies the loss of distinct and individual existence . . . by the
States.” Texas v. White, 7 Wall. 700, 725 (1869)." hall v hall 584 U. S.
____ (2018)
Justice O'CONNOR (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the Court: As every schoolchild learns, our Constitution establishes a
system of dual sovereignty between the States and the Federal Government.
This Court also has recognized this fundamental principle. In Tafflin v.
Levitt, 493 U.S. 455, 458 (1990), "[w]e beg[a]n with the axiom that, under
our federal system, the States possess sovereignty concurrent with that of
the Federal Government, subject only to limitations imposed by the
Supremacy Clause." Over 120 years ago, the Court described the
constitutional scheme of dual sovereigns: " '[T]he people of each State
compose a State, having its own government, and endowed with all the
functions essential to separate and independent existence,'... '[W]ithout
the States in union, there could be no such political body as the United
States.' GREGORY v. ASHCROFT, 501 U.S. 452
Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India, 434 U.S. 308
USOYAN v REPUBLIC OF TURKEY 6 F.4th 31 (July 27, 2021
)
Private Attorney General
A private citizen who commences a lawsuit to enforce a legal [or lawful]
right that benefits the community as a whole [with the power of the
attorney general. CARDINALE, v. KEANE, CARDINALE, v. JONES et al. Nos.
A21A1718, A21A1719 [[February 15, 2022]].
West's Encyclopedia of American L
aw, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc.
What Are Private Attorneys General?
By: Robert J. Nahoum [tristate area lawyer]
...A private right of action simply empowers private attorneys [or private
citizens] to do whatever the Attorneys General are authorized to do. Thus,
we have the Private Attorneys General.
the PAGA gives a private citizen the right to pursue fines that would
normally only be available to the State of California. As such, it is truly
allowing a private citizen to act as an attorney general. Cal. Lab. Code §
2699(a). [michael tracy california attorney]
18 U.S.C. § 1962(c). The statute "provides a private civil action to
recover treble damages for injury `by reason of a violation of' its
substantive provisions." Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., 473 U.S. 479, 481,
105 S.Ct. 3275, 87 L.Ed.2d 346 (1985)
the legislative history, evidence of congressional intent, and antitrust
strengthen the proposition that the rico "person" includes state and local
governments. first the statute was designed to rid government as well as
business of corrupt influences Private attorney general provisions such as
§ 1964(c) are in part designed to fill prosecutorial gaps. Cf. Reiter v.
Sonotone Corp., 442 U.S. 330, 344, 99 S.Ct. 2326, 2333, 60 L.Ed.2d 931
(1979). This purpose would be largely defeated, and the need for treble
damages as an incentive to litigate unjustified, if private suits could be
maintained only against those already brought to justice. sedima sprl v
imrex co 473 us 479, 497 n. 15 (1985) [state of hawaii plainly qualifies as
a "person" under § 4 and 16 of the clayton act hawaii v standard oil
co.,
405 u.s. 251, 261 (1972) , the presidents commission on law enforcement and
administration of justice, task force report: organized crime 6 (1967)
[Paul A. Hoffman Standing and Liability of State and LocalGovernment Under
the Civil Rico Statute (1989)]
Courts sometimes refer to these requirements as RICO standing or statutory
standing. See In re Taxable Mun. Bond *339 Sec. Litig., 51 F.3d 518, 521
(5th Cir. 1995) ("The standing provision of civil RICO provides that `[a]ny
person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of
section 1962 of this chapter may sue therefor ... and shall recover
threefold the damages he sustains.'" (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c))).
Accordingly, courts insist that damages or injury "as a result of the RICO
violation" is "a necessity for standing under RICO." Id. at 522. Or, as the
Supreme Court has put it, "the plaintiff only has standing if, and can only
recover to the extent that, he has been injured in his business or property
by the conduct constituting the violation." Sedima, 473 U.S. at 496, 105
S.Ct. 3275.
Although statutory standing involves an inquiry into alleged injury, it is
not synonymous with Article III standing. Instead, a motion to dismiss for
lack of statutory standing is analyzed under Rule 12(b)(6), not Rule
12(b)(1). Cox, Cox, Filo, Camel & Wilson, L.L.C. v. Sasol N. Am., Inc., 544
F. App'x 455, 457 n.8 (5th Cir. 2013) (mem.); Arroyo v. Oprona, Inc., 736
F. App'x 427, 429 (5th Cir. 2018) (per curiam); see DeMauro v. DeMauro, 115
F.3d 94, 96 (1st Cir. 1997); In re Schering-Plough Corp. Intron/Temodar
Consumer Class Action, 678 F.3d 235, 243 (3d Cir. 2012); see also Canyon
Cnty. v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc., 519 F.3d 969, 974 n.7 (9th Cir. 2008)
("[T]he question of statutory standing [under RICO] is to be resolved under
Rule 12(b)(6), once Article III standing has been established." (citation
omitted)). HCB FINANCIAL CORP v McPHERSON 8 F.4th 335 (2021)
Soler v. County of San Diego
Case No
. 14cv2470-MMA [an example of how to appeal and successfully get attorney
fees if your denied first instance.] (05-19-2021)
The decision that came closest to addressing the issue at hand is the Sixth
Circuit's en banc opinion in United States v. Thompson, 685 F.2d 993 (6th
Cir.1982). There the court held that "The Office of the Governor" could be
the enterprise in a RICO prosecution. Id. at 998-1000. ...We also agree
with the Sixth Circuit's ultimate conclusion that the prosecution's
approach to this issue in cases such as Thompson and the case at hand may
often not be absolutely necessary under RICO, but it is not forbidden.
...In these unusual circumstances, comity interests do not override the
broad language of RICO, as interpreted in Turkette. The district court did
not err by allowing the state to be the RICO enterprise in this RICO
conspiracy prosecution.
US v. Warner, 498 F. 3d 666 (2007) [theres nothin i can do bout that number
being there. i dont like it either but not much i can do bout it since its
part of the case cite.]
(3) a reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs reasonably
incurred." Id. § 2707(b). The subsection on damages provides that "[i]n the
case of a successful action to enforce liability under this section, the
court may assess the costs of the action, together with reasonable attorney
fees determined by the court." Id. § 2707(c) (emphasis added).
"May" is a word of discretion. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517, 533
(1994). DOMAIN PROTECTION, L.L.C. v SEA WASP No. 20-40411, Consolidated
with No. 20-40518. (January 13, 2022)
The Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U. S. C. § 505, provides in relevant part
that in any copyright infringement action "the court may . . . award a
reasonable attorney's fee to the prevailing party as part of the costs."
Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517, 533 (1994)
To establish standing to bring a claim for relief, a party must show (1)
that their interests are "`arguably within the zone of interests to be
protected or regulated by the statute or constitutional guarantee in
question'" and (2) that they have
suffered or will suffer an "`injury in fact'" or a specific and perceptible
harm. Save a Valuable Env't v. City of Bothell, 89 Wn.2d 862, 866, 576 P.2d
401 (1978) (quoting Ass'n of Data Processing Serv. Orgs., Inc. v. Camp, 397
U.S. 150, 153, 152, 90 S. Ct. 827, 25 L. Ed. 2d 184 (1970)) (addressing
prerequisites to common law standing). Similarly, to obtain declaratory
relief under the ) Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act (UDJA), ch. 7.24 RCW,
a plaintiff must show a justiciable controversy. A justiciable controversy
is
"(1) ... an actual, present and existing dispute, or the mature seeds of
one, as distinguished from a possible, dormant, hypothetical, speculative,
or moot disagreement, (2) between parties having genuine and opposing
interests, (3) which involves interests that must be direct and
substantial, rather than potential, theoretical, abstract or academic, and
(4) a judicial determination of which will be final and conclusive." To-Ro
Trade Shows v Collins, 144 Wn.2d 403, 411, 27 P.3d 1149 (2001) (emphasis
added) (alteration in original) (quoting Diversified Indus. Dev. Corp. v.
Ripley, 82 Wn.2d 811, 815, 514 P.2d 137 (1973)). These UDJA prerequisites
encompass the common law prerequisites to standing. Id. at 414. Williams v.
City of Spokane No. 99071-9 (March 3, 2022)
A person or a family may have a spiritual stake in First Amendment values
sufficient to give standing to raise issues concerning the Establishment
Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. Abington School District v. Schempp,
374 U. S. v203. We mention these noneconomic values to emphasize that
standing may stem from them as well as from the economic injury on which
petitioners rely here. Certainly he who is "likely to be financially"
injured, FCC
v. Sanders Bros. Radio Station, 309 U. S. 470, 477, may be a reliable
private attorney general to litigate the issues of the public interest in
the present case. ASSOCIATION OF DATA PROCESSING SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS v
CAMP 397 U.S. 150 (1970)
The R
ice family has cleared that hurdle too. Its procedural injury is tied to
the family's economic interest in developing its property. Such "palpable
economic injuries have long been recognized as sufficient to lay the basis
for standing." Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727, 733 (1972). And without
the P& Z Commission's approval, the family's development plans could not
proceed. So the Rice family is no bystander, asserting a mere "interest in
having the [proper] procedures observed." Lujan, 504 U.S. at 573 n.8. The
family's application was subject to the P&Z Commission's allegedly
unconstitutional process and its outcome affected the family's ability to
develop its land. The Rice family has demonstrated injury-in-fact. Rice v.
VILLAGE OF JOHNSTOWN No. 21-3268. (April 8, 2022)
The object of civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to
turn them into prosecutors, "private attorneys general," dedicated to
eliminating racketeering activity. 3 Id., at 187 (citing Malley-Duff, 483
U.S., at 151 ) (civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose [of]
encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently to investigate"). The
provision for treble damages is accordingly justified by the expected
benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an object pursued the sooner
the better. Rotella v. Wood et al., 528 U.S. 549 (2000)
JOSEPHS v MARZAN Civil No. 21-0749 (JRT/DTS) (January 5, 2022)
A per curiam opinion of the federal Supreme Court then superimposed Judge
Frank's metaphor -- without crediting the author -- upon the award of an
attorney fee authorized by a federal statute. (Newman v. Piggie Park
Enterprises (1968) 390 U.S. 400, 402 [19 L.Ed. 2d 1263, 1265-1266, 88 S.Ct.
964]. Bradley v. Richmond School Board
(1974) 416 U.S. 696, 719 40 L.Ed.2d 476, 492-493, 94 S.Ct. 2006
CRUMWELL v ROBERT A. SIEGEL AUCTION GALLERIES, INC. 1:21-cv-9585-VSB
(January 27, 2022)
ARIZONA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION v STATE OF ARIZONA, A BODY POLITIC
cv-21-0234-T/AP (Januar
y 6, 2022)
Earth Island Institute v. Brands Civil Action No. 21-2659 (JEB) (March 24,
2022)
State ex rel. Berger v McMONAGLE 82-1139 (July 13, 1983)
STATE OF NEBRASKA EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DISCIPLINE OF THE NEBRASKA SUPREME
COURT v KRATINA A-21-686 (March 25, 2022)
re ExxonMobil Corp., 635 S.W.3d 631 (2021)
In re ExxonMobil Oil Corporation 01-22-00088-CV (February 24, 2022)
IN RE RICHMOND Nos. 05-21-01068-CV, 05-21-01069-CV, 05-21-01070-CV.
(plaintiff failed to get his writ of mandamus in this case. but this shows
not only can random people be a private attorney general they can be a
relator still.)
STATE EX REL. FLUTY v. RAIFF 2021-1250
18 usc 112 [18 usc 1116(b)(4)], 15 usc 78u-3, 33 usc 1365, 42 usc 1983 [18
usc 242] [involving p.a.g Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Act of 1976 42 usc
1981-1986 title IX of Public Law 92-318 [[20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1688]], or
title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [[42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d-2000d--4]],
trezavant v city of tampa 741 f2d 336, case winnings some might be
interested in 15 usc 17], 18 usc 1968, 18 usc 1966, 28 usc 1919 [28 usc
2254], 18 usc 245, 18 usc 241, 33 usc 1316 [pub law 92-500, 33 usc 1319],
18 usc 1961-1968, 18 usc 1201, 18 usc 1203, 18 usc 2441, 18 usc 2331, 18
usc 2381, 18 usc ch 63 [one in particular 18 usc 1349], 18 usc 24, 18 usc
178, 18 usc 111, 18 usc 118, 18 usc 246, 42 usc 1988 [42 usc 12205], 49 usc
30172, 18 usc 1512, 15 usc 2087, 5 usc 2302, 42 usc 12203, 18 usc 3071,
some may be interested in 42 usc 2000cc [18 usc 247], 18 usc 248,
revan-bennett act 2017 public law 53-1 sec 4, 26 usc 862, 28 usc 1746, 15
usc 7901 [for those of you that dont know], 15 usc ch 9A [for those of you
that think im weather crazy], [some of you might also like] 15 usc 1692, 18
usc 2707,
They Are Laughing At You (9:13)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=uT9WNoEucZw
"HAIL SATAN" OPENS GOVERNMENT MEETING (i imagine this will go as well for
the alaska government as the last group that decided to open a government
meeting with that bs. 14:45)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mVGQOZyuUC0/
PENNSYLVANIA CANDIDATE OUTS TWO WEF PUPPETS DURING US SENATE DEBATE (9:45)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FKATTnTN_7o/
VICE Covers Placer.ai (5:44)
https://odysee.com/@ChadChaddington:d/VICE-Covers-Placer:e
Definitely not spying on you (55 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/definitely-not-spying-on-you:a
WHILE EVERYONE'S DISTRACTED (19:24)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZKVcViIeQIo
Disney Connection To Indoctrination Of Kids (11:17)
https://rumble.com/v13nm4o-goodbye-abcs-hello-groomer-lgbts-disney-connection-to-indoctrination-of-kid.html
Hospital Denies Unvaxxed 17-YR Old Over Jab Status (14:27)
https://rumble.com/v13nl07-may-5-2022.html
OMEGA TO RELEASE EYE IMPLANTS TO CONNECT TO AUGMENTED REALITY (5:49)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4Dau7BoPFlS2/
They Better Be Or They’re Gonna Be Out of Here!” – Biden Climate Advisor
Gina McCarthy Threatens Airlines to Follow New Sustainable Energy Rules or
Face Destruction (VIDEO) (thats not how this country or the law works. sure
they can make up whatever, but they also can be held responsible for being
stupid too.)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/better-gonna-hear-biden-climate-advisor-gina-mccarthy-threatens-airlines-follow-new-sustainable-energy-rules-face-destruction-video/
Mao Lover Anita Dunn to Return to West Wing as Regime Braces For GOP
Investigations of Joe Biden
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/mao-lover-anita-dunn-return-west-wing-regime-braces-gop-investigations-joe-biden/
Leftwing Group Doxxes Home Address of Conservative Supreme Court Justices
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/breaking-leftwing-group-doxxes-home-address-conservative-supreme-court-justices/
Attorney General Merrick Garland Unveils New “Office of Environmental
Justice” to Advance Biden’s Climate Agenda (VIDEO) (yet another thing i
said has come to pass. good thing we already have a counter group like
nsea.)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/attorney-general-merrick-garland-unveils-new-office-environmental-justice-advance-bidens-climate-agenda-video/
Marxist Los Angeles DA George Gascón will NOT Bring Felony Charges Against
Knife-Wielding Man Who Attacked Dave Chappelle
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/marxist-los-angeles-da-george-gascon-will-not-bring-felony-charges-knife-wielding-man-attacked-dave-chappelle/
Glad you cleared that up (52 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/phew!-glad-you-cleared-that-up:3
Fort Benning Ground Zero For War On Patriotism (14:35)
https://rumble.com/v13nle0-major-general-corruption-fort-benning-ground-zero-for-war-on-patriotism.html
Republican Clerk in Colorado Hands Over Copies of Hard Drives After
Attempting to Protect Evidence Soros-Backed Secretary of State Tried to
Delete
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/republican-clerk-colorado-hands-copies-hard-drives-attempting-protect-evidence-soros-backed-secretary-state-tried-delete/
Mask on, mask off (37 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/mask-on,-mask-off:9
DR. JONAS SALK ADMITTED THE POLIO VACCINE CAUSED POLIO (6:28)
https://odysee.com/@neverlosetruth:0/Dr.-Jonas-Salk-Admitted-To-the-Polio-Vaccine-Causing-the-Disease-Itself:d
HELP US FIGHT THE DIGITAL SURVEILLANCE STATE (11:43)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DaAFlA85p7s/
https://t.me/marksteele5g/6513
https://t.me/marksteele5g/6495
FDA Restricts Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 Shot Due to Risk of Blood Clots
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/fda-restricts-johnson-johnson-covid-19-shot-due-risk-blood-clots/
FDA Debunks Pfizer’s Claim: ‘No Evidence’ that Retaking Paxlovid Pill Stops
Recurring Covid-19 Symptoms
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/fda-debunks-pfizers-claim-no-evidence-retaking-paxlovid-pill-stops-recurring-covid-19-symptoms/
Republican Attorneys General Sue Joe Biden For Colluding with Big Tech to
Censor Information on Hunter’s ‘Laptop From Hell’ and Covid
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/republican-attorneys-general-sue-joe-biden-colluding-big-tech-censor-information-hunters-laptop-covid/
The Ministry of Truth (11:43)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=td58JaUL054
When Everything is Off Brand 2 (2:45)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Cb4-IGDwxcQ
