The Miser Bros (51 sec)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=7nqn1Nflehg
Global Health Elites Hatch EVIL Plot; W.H.O. Removes ‘Dignity, Human Rights
& Freedoms (the sooner you people get your rights come from God and that
were all his littles ones vested with sovereignty the better. these clowns
cant strip what was never given by them, the subordinates cant strip their
superior of power. why do you people think their attacking the constition
which protects your God given unalienable rights and christianity so much,
hello the lights are on but is anyone home? pay attention or you might miss
some things i dont usually put with the case cites i have been repeating
lately, a good reminder is also if they decide to try to force you into a
vacscheme knowing a christian believes the body is the holy church or
temple; 18 usc 247 protected by the first part of the constitution and we
wouldnt want pigs to face war crimes for not limited to the aforementioned,
genocide, treason, sedition etc now would we?
The doctrines thus delivered we call the revealed or devine law, and they
are to be found only in the holy scriptures. These precepts, when revealed,
are found upon comparison to be really a part of the original law of
nature, as they tend in all their consequences to man's felicity...this law
of nature, being coeval with man kind and dictated by God himself, is of
course superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over all the
globe and in all countries, and at all times: no human laws are of any
validity, if contrary to this.." blackstone's commentaries on the laws of
england (1765-1769), section 2, page 41.
Justice KENNEDY (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the Court: And, first, the law ascribes to the king the attribute of
sovereignty, or pre-eminence..Hence it is, that no suit or action can be
brought against the king, even in civil matters, because no court can have
jurisdiction over him. For all jurisdiction implies superiority of power" 1
Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England pp 234-235 (1765)..Justice
SOUTER, STEVENS, GINSBURG, and BREYER (Supreme Court of the United States)
join, dissenting: The principle is, that all human law must be prescribed
by a superior..The sovereign, when traced to his source, must be found in
the man. Id., at 458. 1 Blackstone Commentaries. pp 241, 242. ALDEN v.
MAINE, 527 U.S. 706
11 Am Jur §3 fn 1: What is a Constitution? It is the form of government,
delineated by the mighty hand of the people, in which certain first
principles of fundamental laws are established. Vanhorne v. Dorrance. The
Constitution is the fundamental law of the state, in opposition to which
any other law or any direction or order must be inoperative and void.
Asplund v. Hannett.
Insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land,
(constitution) it is superseded thereby..no one is bound to obey an
unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it. 16 Am Jur 2d
177, Late Am Jur 2d. 256
The stare decisis doctrine and its exceptions do not apply where a lower
court is compelled to apply the precedent of a higher court. See 20
Am.Jur.2d Courts § 183 (1965).
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no
rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona,
384 U.S. 436, 491.
REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J. concurring (Supreme Court of Wisconsin): *921
¶68 The people of Wisconsin pronounced liberty to be of primary importance,
establishing government principally to protect their freedom. "The
Wisconsin Constitution begins with a Declaration of Rights, echoing
language from our nation's Declaration of Independence, recognizing that
the proper role of government—the very reason governments are instituted—is
to secure our inherent rights, including liberty:
All people are born equally free and independent, and have certain inherent
rights; among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; to
secure these rights, governments are instituted, deriving their just powers
from the consent of the governed.
Wis. Const. art. I, § 1 (emphasis added). `Too much dignity cannot well be
given to that declaration.' An inherent right to liberty means all people
are born with it; the government does not bestow it upon us and it may not
infringe it." Porter v. State, 2018 WI 79, ¶52, 382 Wis. 2d 697, 913 N.W.2d
842 (Rebecca Grassl Bradley, J. and Daniel Kelly, J., dissenting) (emphasis
added; internal citation omitted). Under the Wisconsin Constitution,
government officials, whether elected or appointed, are servants of the
citizens, not their masters..¶77 This court is well aware that many
Wisconsin citizens support the Safer at Home Order while many oppose it.
This court does not base its decisions on popular opinion; it grounds them
in the law. It is for the political branches, not the judiciary, to respond
to the public's wishes, and for this court to declare whether each branch
acts within its constitutional grant of power and in accord with statutory
law.[14] "Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase
granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power
granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave
emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its
limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of
emergency, and they are not altered by emergency." Home Bldg. & Loan Ass'n
v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398, 425, 54 S.Ct. 231, 78 L.Ed. 413 (1934) *927
(emphasis added). In a republic in which the constitution demarcates the
powers assigned to each branch of government, it is of foundational
importance which government official presumes the power to control the
people. Particularly in an emergency, this court may not cast aside the
constitution nor disregard statutory law. Wisconsin Legislature v. Palm,
942 NW 2d 900
Justice GOLDBERG (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the Court: 'The Constitution of the United States is a l
aw for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the
shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all
circumstances.' Ex parte Milligan, 4 Wall, 2, 120--121. Robert F. KENNEDY
v. MARTINEZ, 372 U.S. 144 (1963). [Same quote in: TERRITORY OF HAWAII, v.
MANKICHI, 190 U.S. 197 (1903); WILSON v. NEW, 243 U.S. 332 (1917) dissent;
RUPPERT v. CAFFEY U.S Atty., 251 U.S. 264 (1920); DUNCAN v. KAHANAMOKU,
Sheriff, 327 U.S. 304, concurring (1946); U.S. v. BARNETT, 376 U.S. 681,
dissent (1964).]
Justice BLACK (Supreme Court of the U.S.) announced the judgment of the
Court and delivered an opinion: At the beginning we reject the idea that
when the United States acts against citizens abroad it can do so free of
the Bill of Rights. The United States is entirely a creature of the
Constitution. (fn 3) Its power and authority have no other source. It can
only act in accordance with all the limitations imposed by the
Constitution. (fn 4) When the Government reaches out to punish a citizen
who is abroad, the shield which the Bill of Rights and other parts of the
Constitution provide to protect his life and liberty should not be stripped
away just because he happens to be in another land. This is not a novel
concept. To the contrary, it is as old as government. It was recognized
long before Paul successfully invoked his right as a Roman citizen to be
tried in strict accordance with Roman law. And many centuries later an
English historian wrote:
(fn 3). Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, 326; Ex parte Milligan,
4 Wall. 2, 119, 136--137, Graves v. People of State of New York ex rel.
O'Keefe, 306 U.S. 466, 477; Ex parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1, 25.
(fn 4). Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 176--180; Territory of Hawaii
v. Mankichi, 190 U.S. 197, 236--239 (Harlan, J., dissenting). 'In a
Settled Colony the inhabitants have all the rights of Englishmen. They take
with them, in the first place, that which no Englishman can by expatriation
put off, namely, allegiance to the Crown, the duty of obedience to the
lawful commands of the Sovereign, and obedience to the Laws which
Parliament may think proper to make with reference to such a Colony. But,
on the other hand, they take with them all the rights and liberties of
British Subjects; all the rights and liberties as against the Prerogative
of the Crown, which they would enjoy in this country.' It was against this
general background that two of the greatest English jurists, Lord Chief
Justice Hale and Sir Williamfn 4). Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137,
176--180; Territory of Hawaii v. Mankichi, 190 U.S. 197, 236--239 (Harlan,
J., dissenting). 'In a Settled Colony the inhabitants have all the rights
of Englishmen. They take with them, in the first place, that which no
Englishman can by expatriation put off, namely, allegiance to the Crown,
the duty of obedience to the lawful commands of the Sovereign, and
obedience to the Laws which Parliament may think proper to make with
reference to such a Colony. But, on the other hand, they take with them
all the rights and liberties of British Subjects; all the rights and
liberties as against the Prerogative of the Crown, which they would enjoy
in this country.' It was against this general background that two of the
greatest English jurists, Lord Chief Justice Hale and Sir William
Blackstone--men who exerted considerable influence on the
Founders--expressed sharp hostility to any expansion of the jurisdiction of
military courts. REID v. COVERT, 354 U.S. 1 (1957)
blair, justice:MAN, fearfully and wonderfully made, is the workmanship of
his all perfect CREATOR: A State; useful and valuable as the contrivance
is, is the inferior contrivance of man; and from his native dignity derives
all its acquired importance. When I speak of a State as an inferior
contrivance, I mean that it is a contrivance inferior only to that, which
is divine: Of all human contrivances, it is certainly most transcendantly
excellent. It is concerning this contrivance that Cicero says so sublimely,
"Nothing, which is exhibited upon our globe, is more acceptable to that
divinity, which governs the whole universe, than those communities and
assemblages of men, which, lawfully associated, are denominated STATES[*]
Let a state be considered as subordinate to the people. But let everything
else be subordinate to the state. Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 2 Dall. 419
419.
Nor does the conclusion by any means suppose a superiority of the judicial
to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is
superior to both, LUTHER v. BORDEN, 48 U.S. 1
BROWN, Circuit Judge: In our constitutional republic, Justice Brandeis
observed, the title of citizen is superior to the title of President. Thus,
the questions "[w]ho is the citizen[?]" and "what is the meaning of the
term?" Aristotle, Politics bk. 3, reprinted in part in READINGS IN
POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 55, 61 (Francis W. Coker ed., 1938), are no less than
the questions of "who constitutes the sovereign state?" and "what is the
meaning of statehood as an association?" tuaua v us (2015)
Justice Brown (Supreme Court of the U.S.) announced the judgment of the
court: Notwithstanding its duty to 'guarantee to every state in this Union
a republican form of government' (art. 4, ß 4), by which we understand,
according to the definition of Webster, 'a government in which the supreme
power resides in the whole body of the people Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S.
244
236 OorwoR, J., [connor, j ?] dissenting: When an unusual or extraordinary
power is asserted by the government, or unusual and extraordinary method,
contrary to the procedure and course of the common law, is prescribed by
which the right of the citizen, either in respect to his person or
property, is invaded, every reasonable doubt must be construed against the
asserted power and mode of procedure and in favor of the right of the
citizen to demand that he be tried by due course of law. As in England, all
language in grants are to be construed most strongly in favor of the King,
so in North Carolina all such language must be construed most strongly in
favor of the people — the sovereigns. Daniels v. Homer, 139 N.C. 219
42 usc 659(i)(4) Private person The term "private person" means a person
who does not have sovereign or other special immunity or privilege which
causes the person not to be subject to legal process
A sovereign is exempt from suit not because of any formal conception or
obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be
no legal right as against the authority that makes the law on which the
right depends, and as this doctrine is not confined to full sovereign
powers, it extends to those, such as the territories of the United States,
which in actual administration originate and change the law of contract and
property. Kawananokoa v. Polyblank, 205 U.S. 349 (1907)...City of College
Park v. Clayton County, 830 SE 2d 179 (June 24, 2019)
GIBSON, Chief Justice (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania) opinion of the Court:
"Every highway, toll or free, is licensed, constructed, and regulated by
the immediate or delegated action of the sovereign power, and in every
commonwealth the people in the aggregate constitute the sovereign. But it
is the prerogative of a sovereign to be exempt from coercion by action, for
jurisdiction implies sovereignty, and a sovereign can have no superior.".
O'Connor v. Pittsburgh, 18 Pa. 187 (1851). (Same in 42 Pa.C.C. 579 (1914))
JOHNSON, Justice (the supreme Court of the United States) delivered the
opinion of the court: By making the note negotiable at the Bank of
Columbia, the debtor chose his own jurisdiction; in consideration of the
credit given him, he voluntarily relinquished his claims to the ordinary
administration of justice, and placed himself only in the situation of an
hypothecater of goods, with power to sell on default, or a stipulator in
the admiralty, whose voluntary submission to the jurisdiction of that court
subjects him to personal coercion BANK OF COLUMBIA v. OKELY, 17 U.S. 235
(1819).
[T]he deprivation of constitutional rights ‘unquestionably constitutes
irreparable injury.’” Melendres v. Arpaio, 695 F.3d 990, 1002 (9th Cir.
2012) (quoting Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976) ["Loss of First
Amendment Freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably
constitutes irreparable injury." Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347; 6 S. Ct.
2673; 49 L. Ed. 2d (1976)]). Thus, evidence of an ongoing constitutional
violation (i.e., a policy or practice) satisfies the second element of the
injunctive relief test. See id. Finally, “it is always in the public
interest to prevent the violation of a party’s constitutional rights.” Id.
(quoting Sammartano v. First Judicial District Court, 303 F.3d 959, 974
(9th Cir. 2002)). Riley's American Heritage Farms v. Elsasser, No. 20-55999
D.C. No. 5:18-cv-02185-JGB-SHK (March 17, 2022)
The object of civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to
turn them into prosecutors, "private attorneys general," dedicated to
eliminating racketeering activity. 3 Id., at 187 (citing Malley-Duff, 483
U.S., at 151 ) (civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose [of]
encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently to investigate"). The
provision for treble damages is accordingly justified by the expected
benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an object pursued the sooner
the better. Rotella v. Wood, 528 U.S. 549 (2000)
Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India, 434 U.S. 308
protected persons may in no circumstances renounce in full or in part or in
entirety the rights secured to them by the present convention"' article 8,
geneva convention relative to the treatment of civilians in the time of war
of 1949
3:27)
https://rumble.com/v21nb2a-global-health-elites-hatch-evil-plot-w.h.o.-removes-dignity-human-rights-an.html
Tying It All Together (31:07)
https://vernoncoleman.org/videos/tying-it-all-together
Zelensky to Deliver Remarks in Person to Congress on Wednesday After
Lawmakers Pave Way for a Another $45 Billion to His War Efforts
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/breaeking-zelensky-deliver-remarks-person-congress-wednesday-lawmakers-pave-way-another-45-billion-war-efforts/
McConnell: “Providing Assistance For Ukrainians to Defeat the Russians is
the Number One Priority for the United States Right Now” (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/mcconnell-providing-assistance-ukrainians-defeat-russians-number-one-priority-united-states-right-now-video/
Bankrupt FTX Can Only Locate $1.5 Billion in Assets – Doesn’t Know How Much
It Owes or How Many Employees It Has
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/bankrupt-ftx-can-locate-1-5-billion-assets-doesnt-know-much-owes-many-employees/
GOP Rep. Dan Bishop Releases the Most Audacious Items Included in the $1.7
Trillion Spending Bill – This Is the Raping of America
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/gop-rep-dan-bishop-releases-audacious-items-included-1-7-trillion-spending-bill-raping-america/
George Soros Non-Profits Gave Millions To Anti-Police Groups In 2021
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/report-george-soros-non-profits-gave-millions-anti-police-groups-2021/
CHINESE POLICE STATIONS NOW IDENTIFIED IN THE U.S. (9:56)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AwWPxu7v96E/
Biden Regime Forbids US Border Patrol Officials from Releasing Total Daily
Illegal Alien Apprehensions on Social Media
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/democracy-dies-darkness-biden-regime-forbids-us-border-patrol-officials-releasing-total-daily-illegal-alien-apprehensions-social-media/
US borders are wide open, tour of the El Paso border wall (3:50)
https://rumble.com/v21nk44-exclusive-us-borders-are-wide-open-tour-of-the-el-paso-border-wall.html
Illegal immigrants using private homes as stash houses, City of El Paso
refuses to help (11:11)
https://rumble.com/v21ngw0-exclusive-illegal-immigrants-using-private-homes-as-stash-houses-city-of-el.html
Taliban Bans Women From Afghan Universities
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/taliban-bans-women-afghan-universities/
How can anyone take this seriously? (2:23)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/how-can-anyone-take-this-seriously:a
https://t.me/marksteele5g/11391
“It’s a Crisis” – Massive Increase in the Number of Dead Forces Funeral
Homes in Norway to Store the Dead in Garage
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/crisis-massive-increase-number-dead-forces-funeral-homes-norway-store-dead-garages/
https://t.me/marksteele5g/11397
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/newslondon/magistrate-sacked-after-using-title-to-oppose-covid-vaccines/ar-AA15vMGQ?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=79bfe30ef7ee4f939413bf9b4a7fb4ea
Tim Robbins Now Regrets Adhering “Orwellian” and Politicized Government
Mandates During Pandemic
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/leftist-actor-tim-robbins-now-regrets-adhering-orwellian-politicized-government-mandates-pandemic/
Alert For Elected Officials: Murderous Vaxx Pushers MUST Be Brought To
Justice, No AMNESTY (17:15)
https://rumble.com/v21naz4-urget-alert-for-elected-officials-murderous-vaxx-pushers-must-be-brought-to.html
The feds were rolling back quarantine restrictions on illegal border
crossers while imposing vax mandate on truckers (sound familiar? 6:35)
https://rumble.com/v21nlr6-roxham-road-atip-on-vaccine-requirements.html
A Lot Of Sickness Going Around (1:29)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=fkcwcltRZa4
(2:38)
https://t.me/marksteele5g/11392
God's New World Order, Not Klaus Schwab's (no to the popes new world order
too. 17:51)
https://odysee.com/@BackToTheLight:7/Y2Mate.is---God's-New-World-Order,-Not-Klaus-Schwab's-KVBn_nqH_mg-720p-1655246540427:f
GUESS WHICH HEALTH EMERGENCY WAS JUST CANCELLED? (33:15)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=FYhdK-FhJQU
https://t.me/marksteele5g/11395
WELLS FARGO CHARGED WITH FRAUD( you want to know how ive known the ripple
case has been bs since it started? not only did i already know about the
2015 fincen case but im the 1 who brought it to the worlds attention judge
torres knows about it too.
XRP II, LLC ("XRP II") is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ripple. Id. ¶ 19.
XRP II is registered as a money service business with the Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network ("FinCEN") and is licensed by the New York Department
of Financial Services to conduct certain virtual currency business
activities. Id. In May 2015, Ripple and XRP II entered into a settlement
agreement with the Department of Justice and FinCEN, which refers to XRP as
a "convertible virtual currency." Id. ¶ 379.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15779334824689724771&q=ripple+labs+inc+xrp+virtual+currency&hl=en&as_sdt=2006&as_ylo=2022
https://ripple.com/insights/iso-20022-shaping-the-future-of-cross-border-payments/
https://www.swift.com/standards/iso-20022
https://www.cypherium.io/global-central-banking-think-tank-launches-digital-monetary-institute/
https://www.cypherium.io/digital-currency-interoperability-framework-dcif/
(*crypto hulk voice* ccchhiinnnaaa.)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Q-WBMTCs6wA
20:57)
https://odysee.com/@WAM:0/wellsfargochargedwithfraudwam:7
Missouri Defeats ALL AGES Drag Show – How the St. Louis Area Protected
Children from Obscene, Adult Content
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/missouri-defeats-ages-drag-show-st-louis-area-protected-children-obscene-adult-content/
Georgia Supreme Court Reverses 2020 Election Case Dismissal for “Lack of
Standing”…Sent Back to Lower Courts
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/breaking-georgia-supreme-court-reverses-2020-election-case-dismissal-lack-standing-sent-back-lower-courts/
Parents in Loudoun County Call on School Board to Resign
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/parents-loundon-county-call-school-board-resign/
DeSantis Announces Plans for Legislation Allowing Teachers to Opt Out of
Automatic Union Dues (dont know why anyobe let something like that be on
the books in the 1st place.)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/desantis-announces-plans-legislation-allowing-teachers-opt-automatic-union-dues/
Public Schools During Christmas Time (8:44)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=oIuUFA5BjTk
How to Get Emotional Damage
https://youtube.com/shorts/uXF8Ykf0Ke0
When the Gas Fumes hit (1:01)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=x0N1dk0cbkM
