THE SIMPSONS ? (1:30)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=w34aM4kX1jI
THE QUEEN'S PLANNED EXIT (18:27)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=GUClIElapxo
King Charles III (13:25)
https://odysee.com/@PressForTruth:4/The-King-Exposed:f
Will This Be The Excuse They Use To Phase Out Cash (2:44)
https://odysee.com/@WEGOTAPROBLEM:f/will-this-be-the-excuse-they-use-to:0
Biden’s Pentagon Makes Shameful Suggestion to Troops Struggling to Feed
Their Families
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/bidens-pentagon-makes-shameful-suggestion-troops-struggling-feed-families/
CORRUPTION? Dem Governor Gave COVID Test Contract To Donor — Who Charged
State Double
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/corruption-dem-governor-gave-covid-test-contract-donor-charged-state-double/
AZ Superintendent Of Public Instruction Democrat Kathy Hoffman Sued for
Directing Minors To Hyper-Sexualized Chat Rooms And Grooming Students
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/sick-az-superintendent-public-instruction-democrat-kathy-hoffman-sued-directing-minors-hyper-sexualized-chat-rooms-grooming-students/
DOJ Picks Same Special Master Candidate Who Was Behind Giuliani and
Toensing Home Raids – Michael Cohen Case
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/doj-picks-special-master-candidate-behind-behind-giuliani-toensing-home-raids-michael-cohen-case/
Clinton-Appointed Judge DISMISSES Trump Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton and
FBI Crooks Who Manufactured Russia Collusion Hoax — Then Threatens Trump
Attorneys
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/breaking-clinton-appointed-judge-dismisses-trump-lawsuit-hillary-clinton-fbi-crooks-manufactured-russia-collusion-hoax-threatens-trump-attorneys/
Up to 50 Trump Supporters Have Homes Raided by DOJ-FBI Across the US (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/breaking-update-50-trump-supporters-homes-raided-doj-fbi-across-us-video/
JAILED FOR HAVING YOUR HOME THERMOSTAT SET TOO HIGH (9:09)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kfNu0fbn9S0/
Not Immoral If Nobody Knows Eu Receiving Russian Oil Via Hidden Routes
(4:09)
https://odysee.com/@AussieFighter:8/Not-Immoral-If-Nobody-Knows-Eu-Receiving-Russian-Oil-Via-Hidden-Routes:f
The danger of 5G but we can't opt out? (53 sec)
https://odysee.com/@AussieFighter:8/The-Danger-Of-5G-But-We-Can't-Opt-Out:2
Petty, Unprofessional Officer Admits To Retaliation (5:29)
https://odysee.com/@LackLuster:2/petty,-unprofessional-officer-admits-to:7
Contempt Of Cop, Or Reasonable Arrest? (19:27)
https://odysee.com/@LackLuster:2/contempt-of-cop,-or-reasonable-arrest:0
Racine County Judge Gags Election Fraud Whistleblower Harry Wait at First
Hearing in State’s Prosecution against Popular Activist
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/racine-county-judge-gags-election-fraud-whistleblower-harry-wait-first-hearing-states-prosecution-popular-activist/
Asia's largest new energy automaker goes bankrupt, Why? Warren Buffett
reduces stake in China's BYD (21:33)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Jb1FnCLwZKY
you love them crickets, don’t you? (1:29)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/i-said%E2%80%A6you-love-them-crickets,-don%E2%80%99t:4
SO THE MEXICANS ARE UPSET ABOUT ALL THE AMERICANS MOVING TO MEXICO. WELL
DAMN (mexicans jump the boarder all the time and they want to call people
racist and all kinds of bs but if it happens the other way around theyre
upset lol. cry us a river then jump in it head 1st and breathe deep.
copeium. 1:45)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8Mj6XDMrNT4N/
THERE ARE A LOT OF CONCERTS BEING CANCELLED NOW THROUGH THE END OF THE YEAR
(3:53)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/OPhu2LYD98bx/
Chicago Mayor Lightfoot Calls TX Governor a Racist for Busing Illegals into
Her City without Permission – Then She Quickly Busses Them to Affluent
Suburb Nearby Without Permission
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/chicagos-mayor-lightfoot-promises-illegal-immigrants-bussed-texas-receive-shelter-food-sends-nearby-town-without-informing-mayor/
Private or State Action? – Section 230’s Achilles’ Heel
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/private-state-action-section-230s-achilles-heel/
Clown Planet # 81 (1:30)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/clown-planet-81:8
New York Governor Hochul Declares State of Emergency Over Polio
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/new-york-governor-hochul-declares-state-emergency-polio/
The truth finally comes out (59 sec)
https://odysee.com/@RottenPolitics:a/the-truth-finally-comes-out:7
(24 sec)
https://t.me/marksteele5g/9217
(5:02)
https://t.me/marksteele5g/9214
HOTDOG CHALLENGE
https://youtube.com/shorts/mY2ChIW7gtk
Woman Beheaded with Sword in Front of Onlookers in California
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/horror-woman-beheaded-sword-front-onlookers-california/
Putting the World Economic Forum out of Business (8:39)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=2JfCkRLoNQI
State Senators And Frontline Doctor Have All The EVIDENCE TO INDICT CDC
Officals For VIOLATING FEDERAL LAW And File Unprecedented GRAND JURY
PETITION — Here’s What The CDC Is Doing To Get Away With Mass Murder (
Calif. 'private attorney general' law is constitutional, court rules
https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/calif-private-attorney-general-law-is-constitutional-court-rules-2022-07-01/
The object of civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to
turn them into prosecutors, "private attorneys general," dedicated to
eliminating racketeering activity. 3 Id., at 187 (citing Malley-Duff, 483
U.S., at 151 ) (civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose [of]
encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently to investigate"). The
provision for treble damages is accordingly justified by the expected
benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an object pursued the sooner
the better. Rotella v. Wood, 528 U.S. 549 (2000) )
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/watch-state-senators-frontline-doctor-evidence-indict-cdc-officals-violating-federal-law-file-unprecedented-grand-jury-petition-cdc-get-awa/
(3:18)
https://t.me/marksteele5g/9209
Feelings Police Don't Approve Of Free Speech - Get Owned (63C AM.JUR.2D,
PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
63C Am.Jur.2d, Public Officers and Employees, § 247 As expressed otherwise,
the powers delegated to a public officer are held in trust for the people
and are to be exercised on behalf of the government or of all citizens who
may need the intervention of the officer.
14:49)
https://odysee.com/@LackLuster:2/feelings-police-don't-approve-of-free:7
Zuckerberg Is Losing: Major Companies Remove Facebook Login Option Over
Privacy Concerns
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/major-companies-remove-facebook-login-option-privacy-concerns/
Ridiculous Charges Dropped - Cops Sued (58 sec)
https://odysee.com/@LackLuster:2/ridiculous-charges-dropped!-cops-sued:6
Justice KENNEDY (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the Court: The text and history of the Eleventh Amendment also suggest
that Congress acted not to change but to restore the original
constitutional design. Although earlier drafts of the Amendment had been
phrased as express limits on the judicial power granted in Article III,
see, e.g., 3 Annals of Congress 651-652 (1793) ("The Judicial Power of the
United States shall not extend to any suits in law or equity, commenced or
prosecuted against one of the United States ..."), the adopted text
addressed the proper interpretation of that provision of the original
Constitution, see U.S. Const., Amdt. 11 ("The Judicial power of the United
States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity,
commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States ..."). By its
terms, then, the Eleventh Amendment did not redefine the federal judicial
power but instead overruled the Court: "This amendment, expressing the will
of the ultimate sovereignty of the whole country, superior to all
legislatures and all courts, actually reversed the decision of the Supreme
Court. ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706
joseph story opinion of the court: It is the more rational to suppose that
the courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and
the legislature in order, among other things, to keep the latter within the
limits assigned to their authority.
Federalist, No. 77, by Hamilton.
"Nor does the conclusion by any means suppose a superiority of the judicial
to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is
superior to both, LUTHER v. BORDEN, 48 U.S. 1 (1849)
236 OorwoR, J., [connor, j ?] dissenting: When an unusual or extraordinary
power is asserted by the government, or unusual and extraordinary method,
contrary to the procedure and course of the common law, is prescribed by
which the right of the citizen, either in respect to his person or
property, is invaded, every reasonable doubt must be construed against the
asserted power and mode of procedure and in favor of the right of the
citizen to demand that he be tried by due course of law. As in England, all
language in grants are to be construed most strongly in favor of the King,
so in North Carolina all such language must be construed most strongly in
favor of the people — the sovereigns. Daniels v. Homer, 139 N.C. 219 (1905)
COX, Chief Justice (Supreme Court of Indiana): A "Constitution" is
legislation direct from the people acting in their sovereign capacity,
while a "statute" is legislation from their representatives, subject to
limitations prescribed by the superior authority. People v. May, 3 Mich.
598. [***] The Legislature, acting outside of the Constitution, is without
jurisdiction and its action null." ELLINGHAM v. DYE et al, 178 Ind. 336
(1912)
ERVIN, Chief Justice (dissenting): The people reserve to themselves the
power to propose laws and amendments to the Constitution, * * *. This power
so reserved to the people should not be crippled, avoided, or denied by
technical construction by the courts. It is the duty of the courts to
construe and preserve this right as intended by the people in adopting the
Constitution and thereby reserve unto the people this power.' Adams v.
Gunter, 238 So. 2d 824 238 So.2d 824 (1970)
DENT, P. (Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia): The word "state" is
generally used to denote three different things, and often without
discrimination: First, the territory within its jurisdiction; second, the
government or governmental agencies appointed to carry out the will of the
people; and, third, the people in their sovereign capacity. The state is
not the sovereign in this country. The people who make it are sovereign,
and all its officers are but their servants. RALSTON v. TOWN OF WESTON,
46 W.Va. 544 (1899)
Justice SOUTER, STEVENS, GINSBURG, and BREYER (Supreme Court of the United
States, 1999) join, dissenting:
"[***] The principle is, that all human law must be prescribed by a
superior. [***]
The sovereign, when traced to his source, must be found in the man." Id.,
at 458. 1 Blackstone Commentaries. pp 241, 242. ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S.
706 (1999)
Chief Justice Fuller (Supreme Court of the U.S.) concurr Harlan, Brewer,
and Peckham, dissenting: Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to
law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while
sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty
itself remainswith the people, by whom and for whom all government exists
and acts. DOWNES v. BIDWELL, 182 U.S.244(1901)
Justice KENNEDY (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the Court:
Although the Constitution begins with the principle that sovereignty rests
with the people, it does not follow that the National Government becomes
the ultimate, preferred mechanism for expressing the people's will. ALDEN
v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706 (1999).
Justice STEWART (Supreme Court of the United States) concurring:
We tend to overlook the basic political and legal reality that the people,
not the bureaucracy, are the sovereign. Our Federal Government was created
for the security and happiness of the people. Executives, lawmakers, and
members of the Judiciary are inferior in the sense that they are in office
only to carry out and execute the constitutional regime. The Preamble of
the Constitution states that 'We the people' ordained and established the
Constitution. The Declaration of Independence stated that to insure
'certain unalienable Rights,' 'Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed' and 'That
whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is
the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.' SCHLESINGER v.
RESERVISTS Committee, 418 U.S. 208(1974)
Justice SOUTER, Justice GINSBURG and Justice BREYER (Supreme Court of the
United States) join, concurring:
U.S. Const., Art. VI ("This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States
... shall be the supreme Law of the Land"). VERIZON MARYLAND v. PUBLIC
SERV. COM. 535 U.S. 635 (2002). [see also: Eagle v. State, 153 P.3d 976,
Supreme Court of Alaska (2007)]
JUSTICE ALITO opinion of the court: [C] Yes, our Constitution rests on the
principle that the people are sovereign..Justice GINSBURG, dissenting:
Insofar as a crime offends the "peace and dignity" of a sovereign, Lanza,
260 U.S. at 382, 43 S.Ct. 141, that "sovereign" is the people, the
"original fountain of all legitimate authority," The Federalist No. 22, at
152 (A. Hamilton); see Note, Double Prosecution by State and Federal
Governments: Another *1991 Exercise in Federalism, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1538,
1542 (1967). gamble v us (2019)
Justice KENNEDY (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the Court:
"And, first, the law ascribes to the king the attribute of sovereignty, or
pre-eminence... . Hence it is, that no suit or action can be brought
against the king, even in civil matters, because no court can have
jurisdiction over him. For all jurisdiction implies superiority of power
...." 1 Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England pp 234-235 (1765).
ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706 (1999)
Justice SOUTER STEVENS,GINSBURG,and Justice BREYER join, dissenting:Chief
Justice Jay took a less vehement tone in his opinion, but he, too,
deniedthe applicability of the doctrine of sovereign immunity to the
States. He explained the doctrine as an incident of European feudalism, and
said that by contrast, "[n]o such ideas obtain here; at the Revolution, the
sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of
the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects and have none to
govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equalas fellow citizens,
and as joint tenants in the sovereignty." ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706
(1999)
HODGES, Justice (Supreme Court of Oklahoma) dissenting:
In an old English legal commentary (I Blackstone Commentaries. 242) the
basis for the doctrine was explained: '*** no suit or action can be brought
against the King, even in civil matters, because no court can have
jurisdiction over him. For all jurisdiction implies superiority of power.
Authority to try would be vain and idle, without an authority to redress;
and the sentence of a court would be contemptible, unless that court had
power to command the execution of it; but who, says Finch, shall command
the King.' NEWMAN v. The STATE of Oklahoma ex rel, 1971 OK 84 (1971). [See
all jurisdiction implies superiority: Muni v. Hart, 6 La.Ann. 570 (1851);
MAURAN v. SMITH, 8 R.I. 192 (1865); STATE v. FLETCHER, 39 Mo. 388 (1867);
STATE v. TOWN COUNCIL, 18 R.I. 258 (1893); STATE v. STONE, 120 Mo. 428
(1894); ELLINGHAM Sec. of St v. DYE, 178 Ind. 336 (1912); STATE v. HEDRICK,
294 Mo. 21 (1922); DRIGGS v. UTAH TEACHERS, 105 Utah 417 (1943); NEITING v.
BLONDELL, 306 Minn. 122 (1975)]
The book of BOOBA FEET (1:25)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZRpM0ixg4D0
When the Gas Fumes hit (1:01)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=x0N1dk0cbkM
