Quote from: 2 jurisdictions which one?
Experience: I had a judge say to me years ago when i did not know
much..still do not know much now,, but more than before! Judge said to me
the constitution does not apply here..in Municipal court on a traffic
ticket. So i did not ask the right questions to begin with or proceed..
Hope this helps someone.. below EXCERPT
THE MOST POWERFUL QUESTION TO ASK A JUDGE AS IT RELATES TO JURISDICTION:
*EXCERPT FROM "COURT SURVIVAL GUIDE"*
The only way to get proof is to go through the actual experience. If you
have not been in front of a judge in chambers then you should be quiet
because you have no idea what is going on. Skeptics are worse than
government agents at times. The administrative courts are the only ones
that can give you proof. This is why we use to say you are not a sovereign
unless you have been in front of a judge. Anyone who has not been in front
of a judge I pay absolutely no attention to.
The proof is they won't answer any questions (especially under oath) about
jurisdiction or the nature of the proceeding even though the 6th amendment
guarantees you this right.
If you want proof then go in and ask the judge the following:
QUESTION 2 - "Your Honor, the Constitution grants this court 2 different
criminal jurisdictions: One is a criminal jurisdiction under a Common Law,
and the other is a criminal action that constitutes a condition of contract
under the criminal aspects of a colorable Admiralty jurisdiction. Under
which of these 2 jurisdictions does court intend to try this criminal
action?"
Not wanting to answer this, the judge might just dismiss the case now, but
most will still try to go ahead with it The only choices now are to admit
to which jurisdiction applies, or to avoid answering. Get an answer. If the
Common Law criminal jurisdiction were to be declared, then you win by
default of no sworn complaint by an injured party, and no injured party
present. There is no evidence at all of your interfering with anyone's Life
Liberty, or Property. The case must be dropped. If instead, the Admiralty
criminal jurisdiction were to be declared (foolishly), then you must be
prepared to follow ALTERNATE PLAN B (below). Therefore, most likely, here
is where the judge will probably start squirming and just try to avoid
answering, by advising you to get a licensed attorney for such ’legal
advice’. So here is where you would make a stand by saying :
"Thank you your Honor, but I don’t think that you’d be violating your Oath
of Office if you did your duty under the Constitution. You see I am not
seeking legal advice; what I want to know is your legal intent; and I have
the right to represent myself ’in my own person’ without a licensed
attorney. And in order to intelligently defend myself, I have to know the
jurisdiction that this court is operating under; because the Rules of
Criminal Procedure under a Common Law jurisdiction are very different from
the Rules under an Admiralty jurisdiction. I need to know which
jurisdiction you intend to try me under, in order for me to proceed with
this case. Now the 6th Amendment grants me the right to know the
jurisdiction being applied, and it grants you the duty to inform me; and I
don’t think you’d be violating your Oath of Office for doing so. So please
answer the question."
The judge might dismiss the case here, but will probably continue stalling.
He/she is most likely to reprimand or threaten you for not getting a
licensed attorney. The judge will imply that only licensed attorneys have
this information, that you have to go see a licensed attorney in order to
get the question answered. When this happens, say:
"Thank you Your Honor, LET THE RECORD OF THIS COURT THEN SHOW that I the
accused in this criminal action against me, have asked this court to
divulge the nature and cause of the accusation, upon the authority of the
6th Amendment, and that this court HAS FAILED in its duty to inform me of
the nature and cause of the action. Furthermore, LET THE RECORD ALSO SHOW
that this court intends to bring this criminal action against me UNDER A
SECRET JURISDICTION, THAT IS KNOWN ONLY TO LICENSED ATTORNEYS."
OOPS! Here is where a lot of judges will dismiss the case for whatever
phony excuse. But there are still some diehards asking for more
embarrassment. If the judge is still onto the case here, he/she will have
to come up with an answer for Question 2. He/she will probably make
something huffy up like: "This will be a statutory jurisdiction and I hope
you’re satisfied!" So now, you reply :
"Thank you Your Honor, LET THE RECORD OF THIS COURT THEN SHOW that it
intends to conduct a criminal action against me, , under STATUTORY
JURISDICTION. But the problem is that I have never heard of such a thing as
a criminal action under statutory jurisdiction. I would be happy to accept
this, Your Honor, if you could please tell me where I can find the
published Rules of Criminal Procedure under Statutory Jurisdiction."
Most judges are likely to give up and dismiss the case here, but some might
still be hanging on.
If your case isn't dismissed yet, then you might ask:
Do you have a copy of the statutory Jurisdiction in your office that I
could borrow? Where does this nature, cause, and jurisdiction information
exist? Do you know of a law library anywhere that has a copy of these
rules? Since I am defending myself pro per, isn’t it your duty to specify
which Rules of
Criminal Procedure will be used, so that I may conduct a fair defense in a
fair trial? You must tell me where I can access a copy of the Rules."
This is where you will win, the judge must either lie or dismiss.* The
Truth is that they have just committed to a statutory jurisdiction, and
there is no such thing,* not to mention no official published rules to use.
In some cases the judge will make faces at the prosecutor, and the
prosecutor will motion to dismiss, for some other phony reason. Either way,
you win.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 4:32 AM Adams Holzhaus <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
But thats the thing, is it mixing... Common Law reins supreme, equity,
maritime, and admiralty are subject to common law, they are common law.
On Monday, October 17, 2022, 08:28:29 PM EDT, s s <samiamsamples@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
*Just be carfull not to mix *
*Ucc1 admiralty law*
*Common law*
*Common law hand book *
*For jurors sheriffs bailffs and justices*
*On amazon*
*https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.amazon.com/Common-Law-Handbook-Sheriffs-Bailiffs/dp/149284053X&ved=2ahUKEwj64duswuj6AhUMMUQIHSptB_oQFnoECB0QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0JKamvbjKWRvVsavG_tfZR
<https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.amazon.com/Common-Law-Handbook-Sheriffs-Bailiffs/dp/149284053X&ved=2ahUKEwj64duswuj6AhUMMUQIHSptB_oQFnoECB0QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0JKamvbjKWRvVsavG_tfZR>*
*admiralty law your ucc1 vs common law*
Common law does not act as binding precedent on admiralty courts, but it
and other law may be used when no law on point is available. Parties
subject to admiralty may not contract out of admiralty jurisdiction, and
states may not infringe on admiralty jurisdiction either judicially or
legislatively
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022, 4:45 PM Adams Holzhaus <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Actually, they are heirs to your throne.
On Monday, October 17, 2022, 04:48:37 PM EDT, Skye Dymond <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Always refer to your children as your offsprings.....
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
<https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 4:45 PM, Adams Holzhaus
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
UCC 1-308 is signing without prejudice and reserving ones right. The
answer to your question is. Maxim of law, an unrebutted affidavit stands as
judgement. What you need to do is implement your court of record making
accusation (I.e. you agree to give me full custody of our children). Send
him 3 notices with 30 response time (think of life, you count to 3 for
children to go to bed and adults have 30 days to rebut). If you are signing
any documents from their side, write next to your signature "UNDER PROTEST"
or "WITHOUT PREJUDICE", and on the back of the document, write your
reserved rights ( I reserve the right to be secure in my papers persons and
effects). You have to counter all their paperwork, what I do is what ever
they give me, I use it against them. Last thing, you need to point out (if
its the state named as plaintiff or an Attorney implemented matter, is
trespass because your husband has to put his name and signature on the
legal documents maxim of law no one can bring forth a matter under someone
else name. LAST THING, eat, read, sleep "Maxims of Law". Last thing, when
it comes to "Court of record" (look up the definition on 1215.org) there
is a type of judge you can have sign your unrebutted affidavit and they are
called "Prothonotary". Good Luck!!
Adams Holzhaus
On Monday, October 17, 2022, 04:34:14 PM EDT, Wani <jocanas@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I'm having a horrible divorce. my ex is using my kids as pawns.. he made
my 14 year old daughter lie to cps and tell them I choked her..
if we did or sovereign paperwork and filed ucc 1 308 I have my kids as my
private property..
how can I use this to help me get my kids back from him??...
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022, 9:29 PM Mike <leatherlips1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*From:* mejim1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Sent:* Friday, October 14, 2022 1:13 PM
*To:* mejim1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Janet Lee's Real News 14 Oct 2022 Our Gold-Backed Dollar Truth
about NESARA Re Military Regs Trump Is Still Commander and Chief of Military
*No issues 11-13 October 2022 Time and events are flying! *
*I spend 6 to 8 hours a day searching for, reviewing, compiling and
sending out Janet Lee’s Daily News Editions.*
*Donations appreciated at:* *Janet Lee's Daily Editions | Janet Lee's
News Edition (Powered by Donorbox)
<https://donorbox.org/janet-lee-s-daily-editions> Thanks! *
*Special thanks to all the readers who help support these issues. *[image:
Excited emoticon]*Janet Lee*
