To JB:
In New York the property tax is not DIRECT because they tax the property as
a person. If the owner wants to keep it, he has to "redeem" it by paying
the tax. Otherwise he can just walk away without consequences to himself.
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 7:41 PM Paul M <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I sent a request to the General Land Office in Texas, for the material
concerning my abode. They sent me all the info and I took that to the
Dallas County Records bldg and had it recorded in my name. On that first
page there is a block asking where to send TAX info, it was blank, which I
have concluded that there is no tax due. So every mailing I receive from
any taxing agent in Dallas County, I mark it Return To Sender M<AIL FRAUD
Title 18, Sec 1341 1342 all in red. I make copies of both original and red
marked side. I also COPYRIGHTed my Legal Fiction Dec 2000. Send them bill
for violating cpoyright. Got somemore to send.
On Tuesday, March 30, 2021, 9:54:05 PM CDT, Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you actually have the original patent you technically can do what you
want without some be building codes or easement bs. And best of all get
off the property tax which is illegal direct taxation. Now the question is
how did you get it. So tell us and or how to go about it.
On Mar 30, 2021, at 6:13 PM, Paul M (Redacted sender "willys59sw" for
DMARC) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
all land in America is supposed to be listed in Metes and Bounds. My
latest land survey, registered with the county is in Metes and bounds. I
also brought forward the original Land Patent. And I am an article 4, sec
2,par 1 Citizen of the State of my birth, confirmed by COLB. So are these
various agents violating my rights with their assumptions?.
On Saturday, March 27, 2021, 2:49:10 PM CDT, Ray Greninger <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Art I sec 8, clause 17. They are operating under the municipal and
territorial powers of congress. They are presuming you are on federal
territory.
On Saturday, March 27, 2021, 8:54:13 AM MDT, Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ray- And what is this 1817 your pointing too in relation to what you
stated below
On Mar 27, 2021, at 8:06 AM, Ray Greninger (Redacted sender "raygreninger"
for DMARC) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Remember, these agencies are making the presumption that they are
operating on federal property, a "residence.' (if this is a real raid).
1817, Anything goes there.
On Friday, March 26, 2021, 10:48:10 PM MDT, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
this is laughable Under color of law. the film looks like a setup since
we dont see the actual raid. raids are not laughing people.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
last part is rather simple SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. Bumps stock is legal
too a piece of plastic wall hanger.. wow sorry it hasnt been classified as
a fire arm.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 9:33 PM Winningham Fearn <winfearn@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Best Regards,
Win
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: *Tom* <info@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:27 PM
Subject: FW: Watch "🔴 The ATF Has Started Kicking Doors and Raiding
Homes" on YouTube
To:
*HEADS UP!!!*
*From:* deetom1948
*Sent:* Thursday, March 25, 2021 11:26 PM
*To:* Tom <info@xxxxxxx>
*Subject:* Watch "🔴 The ATF Has Started Kicking Doors and Raiding Homes"
on YouTube
https://youtu.be/8IOpAl3Qk8w
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy A10e, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
