DO Not DECLINE Jury duty. .U have a lot of power, More than you do voting.
Look up Jury Nulfication powers.. U can say FU to a law for example and
find them not guilty or throw out a charge
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 1:42 PM Michael Glavic <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Received.
I'd recommend declining to serve on "Jury Duty," (say, as a conscientious
objector, or whatever, of your true sovereignty, [and duty] otherwise, if
not So true, coming to mind of actually being something if not something So
if not even *more,* meaningful.. Hey, let's actually be "Evidenced
based," shall we, or screw your law, style and/or method, otherwise) or,
further to as much, castigating the legal system wherever and however you
can, otherwise, even before, when you think (how you do?) you're called to
do So, or probably get if not still get what you "deserve," how *I* do,
yeah, for *Justice Reform, *if not Constitutional (or national).) reform,
what sick if not meaningless (Disordered) nation I find we have if not are,
otherwise. No "hot shot" of politics, and complicit law... but what is "So
real and just," and getting things where they are cognitively if not
intelligently going, *Am I.. . *
Indeed, the pervasiveness of darkness and evil to/of our political and
legal system and development(s), to serving "Justice," if not God, if not
Everything *meaningful*... runs deep if not overwhelming to most, to
which I understand I help with and give example to what can only be, of
such, light, of truth, whether you think our minds are being censored if
not worse, or not (Like, where have you seem as much before) I Go So
faithfully and factually, Etc., like as much or not
Michael Glavic
Champion of as much
Or what. Screw with my internet, etc?. (I get that, easily covered up as
of something less.. .) Like someone thinks they're getting the real deal,
or the better of me... with screwing around by knowing what I if not WE
think and do in such respect. "They don't," (but by their filthy and game,
which I intend to prosecute or cleanse in such regard) I'm So sure, and
helping where and how I can if not, *best* in such respect. Hey, where
you thought *I* went away? .. . Not yet, if *ever.. . I Go with as much,
"H*opefully," (So hopefully) even *better* with time.. . I Feel I have
"time" on my side in such respect, and *Go,* accordingly, whatever else
should come along or, *logically/reasonably* does.. .
See *my* faith and facts (if not The facts, that should matter) *shining*
in such respect. I Do.. .
On "Shining," For Justice. I *appreciate* your work and contributions in
such regard
BWE
On Wednesday, July 7, 2021, 10:41:50 p.m. EDT, cordero <
dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*NOTES*: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this
email.
You are encouraged to *share* and post it to social media as
widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of *We the
People*; e.g*., click “Reply All” and send*.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/> <left panel ↓Register or +
New or Users >Add New.
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it
shows irregularities when received, they crept in during transit and are
beyond my control. Kindly overlook them.
Writing your story of abuse by judges and guardians in up to 500 words by
applying the two-phase method; and using it for
demanding that the Biden Commission on Supreme Court reform
hear your testimony at its “public meetings”; and
asking universities and the media,
such as the news agencies Reuters, The Boston Globe,
Propublica, and The Washington Post,
to let the national public hear you by holding the proposed
unprecedented citizens hearings
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_
*method_for_writing_your_story*.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_method_for_writing_your_story.pdf>
By
*Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.*
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
*Judicial Discipline Reform*
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@
Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
A. Telling your story at the most opportune time: when people want to hear
it
1. This article lays out a two-phase method for you to write in up to 500
words the story of the abuse of power by judges that you have suffered or
witnessed.
2. Your effort in writing your story will pay off, for you will be doing
so at the most opportune time: when the public, journalists, universities,
and even many politicians want to hear about those stories in the context
of what will soon dominate the national debate: the Commission nominated
<https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/04/09/president-biden-to-sign-executive-order-creating-the-presidential-commission-on-the-supreme-court-of-the-united-states/>
by President Biden on April 9, 2021, to study ways of reforming
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Biden_SCt_reform_Commission.pdf>
the Supreme Court; and the desire attributed to him and his party “to
pack the Supreme Court”, that is, to increase the number of justices from
9 to 15 and reduce their life-appointment to a term of years.
B. Composing an informative and brief story to be read, heard, and
investigated
3. You want to tell the national public your story of judges’ abuse of
power and make the public share your outrage at it. You also want your
story to be investigated by journalists.
4. But nobody is going to read the scores, never mind hundreds, of pages
generated by your case in court to figure out what your story is all about.
5. Moreover, at a hearing you will have only 5 minutes to tell your
story...a rambling account will not hold the attention of the audience even
that long.
6. In addition, journalists will not investigate a story that is confusing
and missing key pieces of information so that it fails to pique their
curiosity and makes them feel that it would not interest their own
audience.
Therefore, you will benefit from applying the method set forth below for
writing an informative and brief story. You will use it to rehearse your
oral delivery of it at a hearing.
C. Not a professionally written story, but written after doing one’s
homework
7. Research your own documents and cite them so that your story is
accurate and verifiable.
8. Write a story that is significant to the audience: You are not writing
a diary for your private reading. You are writing a story to be read by
others, your audience. Organize it chronologically so that it can be easily
followed by people who are totally unfamiliar with you and it.
9. Highlight the most outrageous events and avoid getting bogged down in
details unimportant to the story even if they are important to you. After
reading it, your audience should be able to exclaim: ‘The judge in this
story did A, B, and C. How outrageous!”
10. Edit your writing to make it as grammatically correct as you can so
that the audience’s attention is concentrated on your story without
grammatical mistakes distracting it and reflecting poorly on your degree of
education and attention to detail.
11. Your objectives are clear: Your accurate and verifiable story earns
you the respect and trust of your audience. Its significance to them earns
you their gratitude. All this may makes you attain your most important
objective: your audience’s action in support of your cause.
12. Your audience’s support will be more likely and stronger if you apply
to the writing of your story a principle of strategic thinking: “People
never listen so attentively and react so positively as when they listen to
avoid harm to themselves and their loved ones.”
13. Make your audience feel that the abuse by judges that you suffered or
witnessed can happen to them too. They can fall prey to the abusers. “
*No!* That is unacceptable. That is outrageous! I must support this
victim to end this abuse before it gets me!”
D. You need intermediaries to bring your story to the national public
14. That must be the reaction of your ultimate audience: the national
public. Only that public, informed about, and outraged
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_out_of_court_inform_outrage_strategy.pdf>
at, judges' unaccountability and riskless abuse of power, can force the
reform not only of the Supreme Court, but also the lower federal court and
even the state courts. Your story alone will not attain that objective, but
it must contribute to attaining it.
15. To tell your story to the national public you need the Biden
Commission as well as journalists and universities to become interested in
it and let you use their means for publicizing it.
16. So, it is shortsighted and counterproductive to disparage the media.
They are not your enemies. They are your loudspeakers. They do not form a
monolithic entity. There are thousands of media outlets and tens of
thousands of journalists. Not all of them have the same point of view,
means, or standing:
*a. The New York Times* and *The Washington Post* do not behave the same
way as a new outfit with a handful of journalists trying to breakthrough in
the world of digital investigations.
17. Yet, they share a common interest: their commercial and reputational
advancement. In addition, they can pick and choose among the scores of
millions of people who have been abused by judges. You need journalists
more than they need you. Treat all of them with respect. That is required
by ethical considerations, professional standards, and strategic thinking.
E. Advice on story writing tested and applied successfully
18. I have applied the advice given here to produce my three-volume study
of judges and their judiciaries. The study rests on professional law
research and writing, and strategic thinking. It is titled and downloadable
thus:
Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability and abuse reporting**
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>*
*†
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates2.pdf>*
♣
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf>
♣ Volume 3: http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3
/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf>
>from
OL3:1144. This article
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_method_for_writing_your_story.pdf>
is at OL3:1329.
19. This article is also posted to my website *Judicial Discipline Reform*
at http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>. It and similar ones have
attracted so many webvisitors and the latter have reacted to them so
positively that *39,040+* have become subscribers to it as of July 7,
2021(Appendix 3
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_method_for_writing_your_story.pdf>
).
20. How many law firms, never mind lawyers, do you know who have a website
with so many subscribers?
21. You can join the subscribers thus: go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/> <left panel ↓Register or +
New or Users >Add New.
F. The two-phase writing method
1. In phase one, use your unrestrained creative spirit to draft your story
22. In the end you want to produce a story that flows smoothly into your
audience’s mind and that is accurate, significant, and verifiable. But at
the beginning, there is the big bang of story creation: The story bursts
out of your mind chaotically onto a computer page (or paper). Anything
makes its way out. Nothing is subjected to critical thought controls. If it
pops up, jot it down.
23. Sit at your computer and write on a word processing page whatever
word, term, or phrase identifies a person, event, place, document, thing,
idea, concept, etc., apparently associated with your story. They are your
story’s informational *dots*. Each opens a crack in your mind and lets
other escape.
24. You are not yet trying to write grammatically correct and complete
sentences. You only want to get started telling your story. Blurt anything
and everything onto the page.
25. Let your stream of consciousness bubble out unrestrained by your
thinking mind so that it sprinkles *dots* of your story all over the
page. As related words, terms, and phrases flow out of your mind, keep
adding them to or between the other dots on the page.
26. Widen and multiply the cracks in your mind by asking yourself about
your story *the journalists’ W-questions*: *What!?* Who? Where? When?
How? Why? What now?
27. Keep asking of every word, term, phrase, and sentence concerning an
event: “*then what* happened?...and *then what* did they say?...and *then
what* did I do?...and *then*...?” They are alive in your mind. They can
hear and answer you. They can even ask you questions.
28. If informational *dots* or you ask questions that you cannot answer
right away, only jot them down. Do not interrupt the fireworks of dots. Let
it rip! Enjoy. Search for answers and evaluate their significance in phase
two. Gradually questions will become more complex:
a. What was the name of the opposing party’s attorney?...and her law firm?
b. Did the judge issue an oral order from the bench or did he read one
that he had written? Did he cite any law or rule?
c. Why did the judge order me to pay rent because the landlord had fixed
the plumbing? I never told him; and the landlord never filed an answer! So
how did the judge know? Did she confused me with another tenant? How many
times has this landlord or his lawyer appeared before this judge?...Mmm.
I’ll have to look into this later on.
29. When you have about ten informational *dots*, move them up and down
in a rough chronological order of appearance in your story. As you do so,
add to them any other words, terms, and phrases that enlarge their meaning,
identify them more narrowly, or should be inserted between them.
30. Keep reading the *dots*, even aloud. Put them in a jingle, make them
rhyme even if they make no sense...and they will come alive!, dancing in
your mind and inviting to dance other words, terms, and phrases that are
also dots. Let them jump onto the stage of your page.
31. Something like sentences will begin to appear. Keep ordering them
chronologically and inserting more *dots* between them or enlarging them
with details.
32. Painting by numbers, using stars to draw a constellation, you are
*connecting
the* *dots* into the sketch of a figure. It seems to be telling a
story...your story! You can do this. You did it! *You are telling your
story!*
33. Use a ‘balancing test’ to compare the *dots*’ weight of
outrageousness for the story to make sense and be significant to them: the
ones who do not know you or your story. Remove to another page dots that
feel of ‘lighter’ significance. You are starting to recognize a hierarchy
among the dots. That will help you stay within the 500-word limit. Combine
the dots into rough sentences.
34. HOURS later you will feel that you have told your story from beginning
to end. Let it sit for a day. You are not done, not even close: You only
wrote your first draft. *But you did!*
2. In phase two, use your critical judgment to edit your story
35. Come back to your draft and read it through. Only thereafter start
moving around and connecting the sentences in a way that will make sense to
a person who does not know anything about it.
36. Avoid confusing your audience: Use the same word to refer to the same
person, idea, event, object, etc. Double check your dates; the names of
places, people, and their titles. Make sure who said what to whom. Do not
trust your memory. Case and other documents. Research the law to provide
citations. Journalists will check them and you must ensure that they can
verify them. Be accurate.
37. Right now you are writing for an audience of journalists. They are
knowledgeable, critical, and demanding. But they do not know anything about
your story. Do not assume that they can fill in the details that you left
out that are necessary for your story to make sense to them.
38. Try to the best of your ability to tell them a story that persuades
them of the outrageousness of unaccountable judges’ riskless abuse of
power. But do not be melodramatic; do not exaggerate.
39. Never make up details. Always make a clear distinction between facts,
opinion, and impressions. Admit that you do not know what you do not know.
You may be able to tell a lie as to a dot here or there.
40. But journalists look at the whole picture and realize how false dots
do not fit in. Lie-ridden mouths are not invited to tell their story.
41. Even if you did not intend to provide false details, as when lying,
but your details are incorrect for failure to check them against documents
and other sources, you become an unreliable storyteller. You lose
credibility. Never compromise it.
42. Self-editing means revising and rewriting your draft story; and
correcting your grammar and the position of paragraphs, sentences, and
clauses. It will take longer than drafting it: Dots were connected into a
sketch. Now you are painting the sketch with the colors of accuracy,
verifiability, and significance that reveal the outrageousness of the abuse
of power of the judges in your story.
a. What to omit
43. Abstain from outbursts intended to elicit pity and appeal for
commiseration. Do not appear emotionally fragile, unstable, or
hypersensitive. Do not come across as a basket case.
44. Do not dilute your story’s significance with trivial details and petty
grievances. A barrage of charges betrays incapacity to identify what is
legally relevant. Do not diminish the credibility of your story with
unfounded accusations, speculation, and extravagant claims. Trying to turn
your experience into a nightmare does not make for a serious story; you are
not scripting a horror movie.
45. Do not impair your story’s verifiability by making unprovable claims.
Fantasy allegations make your story a fairy tale. Let independent
investigators reveal what coming from a party –and as such biased toward
her side of the story− sounds preposterous. Turn ‘reality that is stranger
than fiction’ into a question that becomes a lead for investigative
journalists:
a. Did the judge put his kids on food stamps although he earns a judges’
salary?!
Did he have his niece hired by the winning party to have her pay his
gambling debts?
b. Does he tell his law clerks that if at the end of their clerkship when
they search for a job they want him to write them a glowing letter of
recommendation, which can earn them a substantial sign-up bonus from the
hiring employer, they have to decide the cases assigned to him and write
the decisions, which explains why the style of the decisions signed by him
is so oddly different every year after the start of the new clerkship?
c. Also leave out anything on which honest people can reasonably hold
different opinions. It falls within the judges’ wide margin of discretion.
Your opinion is not entitled to more credibility than the judges’,
especially since you are not a lawyer, but rather a biased party, as all
parties are.
b. What to include
46. Focus on the judges’ violation of criminal law, which their fellow
judges will not want to appear defending, lest they dirty their own image:
e.g.,
a. denial of due process and equal protection of the law;
b. conflict of interests;
c. abuse of public office and confidential information for self-enrichment
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-media_DARE.pdf>;
d. bribery;
e. bankruptcy fraud
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_how_fraud_scheme_works.pdf>,
concealment
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_abuse_by_justices.pdf>
of assets, tax evasion, and money laundering;
f. interception
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_judges_intercepting_emails_mail.pdf>
of people’s mail and emails to detect and suppress those critical of
judges;
g. disregard of rules of conduct
<https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/code-conduct-united-states-judges>;
cronyism;
h. cover-up;
i. ethnic, racial, socio-economic, gender, or religious bias;
j. physical or sexual abuse;
k. arbitrariness; and
l. what offends the common sense of decency and propriety.
46. Provide pieces of information, e.g., names and dates, that can be
treated as data: They can be scanned into a database to find the most
convincing type of evidence: patterns of abuse by judges and their cronies,
formed by their recurrence in the stories separately provided by different
people.
47. Let your story sit for a day or two. Come back to it for another
phase-two session. You are writing your story to tell it first to
journalists; and if it passes muster, they will bring it to the national
public.
48. Eventually, your story will be the basis for your claim for
compensation
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_inform_outrage_be_compensated.pdf>.
What you say now binds you later on. Do what it takes to get your story
right. It must be accurate, verifiable, and significant.
G. Title, subtitle, and theme of the story
49. After writing your story, you will recognize a theme running through
it. Turn it into the title that expresses the nature of your story and its
main takeaway.
50. In general, the theme of your story and that of the other witnesses is
“judges’ unaccountability and consequent riskless abuse of power”.
51. In particular, emphasize, whether in the title and certainly
throughout the story, the judges’ three most outrageous acts. “If the
most cannot do it, the lesser need not try.”
52. There follow sample titles that summarize their respective story in a
sentence:
How a judge failed to recuse himself from a case where he approved the
foreclosure on an apartment building, the eviction of all the tenants, and
its conversion into an office building by a development company in which he
is a shareholder
How a judge once more declared another wealthy senior citizen incompetent
and appointed as her guardian a person to whom he regularly entrusts
guardianships, who squeezed every penny from her, and then dumped her onto
the state welfare system as an indigent
How a bankruptcy judge allowed the same bankruptcy trustee to hold yet
another unannounced auction where only one and the same bidder showed up,
bought the debtor’s assets for pennies on the dollar, flipped them, and
made a killing...
leaving me as the financial corpse
Bonfire of integrity at the penthouse: Judges attending a judicial
conference boasted about how they cut corners on the law, use parties’
information to enrich themselves and their partners, and have clerks fudge
documents; and were overheard by the apparently invisible waiters and
waitresses serving them, who reported them to their chief circuit judge;
and although the chief deemed their reports complaints, she dismissed them
without the waiters and waitresses ever being interviewed as part of any
investigation
H. Additional information in links embedded in text and as endnotes
53. It is assumed that you will email your story. Attachments to them are
risky because when opened they can release a virus into the recipient’s
computer. As a result, some email computers (servers) do not accept for
delivery emails with attachments. Do not send them.
54. Instead, turn a reference to a person, event, place, document, etc.,
into a linking blue keyword
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Reuters_judges_investigation.pdf>,
which holds embedded in it a ‘hidden’, not visible, link to a supporting
document: Click on the keyword >in the dropdown menu click on the word
Hyperlink >in the box type in the hyperlink >click enter. The keyword
should turn blue indicating that it has an embedded link.
55. Be reasonable: do not mar your story with dozens of blue words. Use
your good judgment to identify the documents whose links should be
embedded. If readers need more supporting documents, they can ask you for
them. Store the linked documents either on your website, DropBox, Google
Plus, Academia, or any other cloud storage facility.
56. If need be, you may provide at the end of your story a “List of links
to supporting documents”.
a. Add a brief description of what the corresponding document deals with.
b. Include in the list the documents of the opposing party and the
decisions of the judges in your case.
c. Be fair. Let them ‘talk' too. Do not give the impression that you are
hiding the other side of the story or that you are so self-centered and
small-minded that you think your story only has one side: yours.
d. Be helpful: spare journalists and other readers the need to search for
those documents, which should be at your fingertips because you received
them and should have read them.
I. Sign and date your story
57. If your address, telephone number, and email address were not stated
at the top of your story, state that information at the end of it. Show
that you take responsibility for your story.
58. Moreover, your contact information will facilitate getting in touch
with you to ask for any needed clarification or additional information.
59. Provide the date when you submit your story. That information is
useful, in general, to order documents chronologically and, in particular,
to establish your story’s currency, i.e., its ‘as of date’.
J. Advocates’ reciprocal revision of their stories, checklist, and chapters
60. Before submitting your story, share it with the Advocates of Honest
Judiciaries to whom I send my articles –see the To: and cc: boxes of my
emails and OL2:1140¶28
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates2.pdf>–.
Ask that they provide feedback on it just as you offer to do the same if
they share with you their story.
61. A competition for the title of “Protagonist of the Worst Abuse by
Judges Ever” or the attitude “My story is more importan that yours cuz it
effects more people” does not improve any story. They are egocentric and
wasteful of everybody’s effort, goodwill, and time.
62. Cooperate to identify and rephrase, eliminate, or correct what is
inaccurate, insignificant, or unverifiable; ambiguous; inconsistent;
contradictory; digressive; repetitive; pretentious; self-aggrandizing;
defamatory; a poor word choice; trite; in bad taste; foul language, which
is impermissible; misspelled; unidiomatic; wrong syntax (word order);
ungrammatical; etc.
63. All of you can draw up a “Checklist and Evaluation Form for Stories
of Abuse of Power by Judges”. It can be used when composing the proposed
Annual
Report
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_judicial_unaccountability_brochures_report.pdf>
on Judicial Unaccountability and Abuse of Power in America.
64. Reciprocal revisions will afford you the opportunity to know each
other. You and others can form *a chapter of Advocates* who promote in
turn the formation of a national, civic, single issue movement for judicial
abuse of power exposure, compensation of victims, and reform.
K. Blocs of email addresses where to send your story
65. When you are ready to send your story, copy the bloc of email
addresses below and paste it in the corresponding box of your email:
*To* [for the commissioners of the Biden Commission]:
cristina.rodriguez@xxxxxxxx, robert.bauer@xxxxxxx, kandrias@xxxxxxxxx,
jack.balkin@xxxxxxxx, RBauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, baude@xxxxxxxxxxxx, madams@
yu.edu, charles@xxxxxxxxxxxx, acrespo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wdellinger@xxxxxxx,
ecb95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, justin.driver@xxxxxxxx, rfallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
heather.k.gerken@xxxxxxxx, ngertner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgoldsmith@
law.harvard.edu, tgriffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tgrove@xxxxxxxxxx, bhuang@
law.columbia.edu, mkang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ojohns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lacroix
@uchicago.edu, lemos@xxxxxxxxxxxx, levi@xxxxxxxxxxxx, trevor.morrison@
nyu.edu, cnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rick.pildes@xxxxxxx, mramsey@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
krooseve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, d-strauss@xxxxxxxxxxxx, bross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
tribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, awhite36@xxxxxxx, kewhitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
development@xxxxxxxxxxxx, michael.waldman@xxxxxxx, caroline.fredrickson@
georgetown.edu, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
*cc* [for journalists]:
“Veterans Today Senior Editor Gordon Duff” <gpduf@xxxxxxx>, “Veterans
Today Managing Editor Jim W Dean” <jimwdean@xxxxxxx>, ajaffe@xxxxxxxxxxx,
john.shiffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, michael.berens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
blake.morrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, “Todd Wallack” <twallack@xxxxxxxxx>,
“Brian McGrory Editor” <brian.mcgrory@xxxxxxxxx>, contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
charles.ornstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tracy.weber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, spotlight@
globe.com, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
patricia.wen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, marketresearch.thomsonreuters@
thomsonreuters.com, ijerr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, newstip@xxxxxxxxx,
newsletters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@
publicintegrity.org, emily.holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, NTotenberg@xxxxxxx,
ryan.grim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Laura.Crimaldi@xxxxxxxxx, inytletters@xxxxxxxxxxx,
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Evan.Allen@xxxxxxxxx, info@xxxxxx,
Elizabeth_Warren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ginger.thompson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
mcnulaj@xxxxxxxxxxx, MCoyle@xxxxxxx, communication@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, aglantz
@stanford.edu, watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mderienzo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
joepatrice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
tips@xxxxxxxxxxx, aturturro@xxxxxxx, Opencourt@xxxxxxx,
letters@xxxxxxxxxxx, contact_us@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Matt.Rocheleau@xxxxxxxxx, oped@xxxxxxxxxxx, jmaxeiner@xxxxxxxxx, Jackie.
Botts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hello@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Jaimi.Dowdell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Vernal.Coleman@xxxxxxxxx, Brendan.McCarthy@xxxxxxxxx, Andrew.
Chung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lawrence.Hurley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Andrea.Januta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
66. Post the article to social media, such as:
Facebook, Youtube, LinkedIn, Instagram, Google Plus,
Pinterest, Reddit, Snapchat, WhatsApp
Twitter: Request that the Biden Commission on Supreme Court reform hold
public meetings & journalists and universities hold citizens hearings where
people can tell their story of judges’ abuse of power;
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_
*method_for_writing_your_story*.pdf
67. Precede your story with this professional letterhead and introduction
(which have 483 words and should give you an idea of the length of your
story):
Your name and address,
phone number; email address
The Biden Commission on Supreme Court reform;
Investigative journalists; and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries
Dear Commissioners, Journalists, and Advocates,
Kindly find below my story of the abuse of power by judges that I
have suffered and/or witnessed.
I am sending it to support my request that you hear me and similarly
situated abusees at the “public meetings” that the Commission is mandated
<https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/04/09/president-biden-to-sign-executive-order-creating-the-presidential-commission-on-the-supreme-court-of-the-united-states/>
to hold. You should allow your “meetings” and your report to inform the
national public of how justices and judges behave in practice, abusing
their power for their gain and convenience because they are unaccountable
and their abuse is riskless.
By contrast, if you limit yourself to a mere discussion of the theory of
constitutional law on the Supreme Court, you will have allowed yourselves
to be manipulated as a pretext for implementing the foregone political
decision to “pack the Court”.
I also request that you journalists join forces with journalism,
Information Technology, and business academics to expose judicial abuse of
power at the unprecedented citizens hearings
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_citizens_hearings_outrage_compensation.pdf>
proposed by Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
At those hearings, multidisciplinary panels of journalists and academics
can take the testimony of abusees. They can do so life at media stations
and university auditoriums across the country as well as via video
conference to make it inexpensive and convenient for them and the public to
attend. This can launch a *MeToo!*-like trend of public accountability
here and abroad.
It is overdue: In the 232 years since the creation of the Federal
Judiciary in 1789, the number of federal judges impeached and removed is
only 8! <https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/impeachments-federal-judges>
For comparison, the number of federal officers on the bench on September
30, 2020, was 2,341
<https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/judicial-business-2020>.
Federal judges need not fear losing their jobs. In practice, they have
turned public power entrusted to them into the power of a State above the
state.
The “meetings” and the citizens hearings can expose the nature, extent,
and gravity of judges’ abuse. On that factual basis, the reform can be
undertaken of not only the Supreme Court, where in the October
2019-September 2020 fiscal year only “73 cases were argued and 69 were
disposed of
<https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/year-end/2020year-endreport.pdf>
in 53 signed opinions”, but also the lower federal courts, which
terminated 1,103,337(page 10
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_individual_files_links.pdf>)
in the year to September 30, 2020
<https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/analysis-reports/judicial-facts-and-figures>.
The citizens hearings can be expanded to take the testimony of victims of
state judges, who are just as outrageous in their abuse of power.
The hearings can thus lead to a reform that takes from judges the
unaccountability that they have arrogated to themselves and gives back to *We
the People*, the Masters of all public servants, what is our birthright:
government by the rule of law where *the People* exercise their right to
hold also their judicial public servants accountable for entrusted power
and liable to compensate the victims of their abuse.
Therefore, I request the opportunity to be heard also at the citizens
hearings.
Date: Name:
L. Your reading and feedback group; and my presentation to your group
68. To make it easier for the members of your organization, friends, and
relatives to read the article I suggest that you get together with them via
video conference. Regardless of whether they are in your neighborhood or
anywhere else in our country, on that occasion one person at a time can
read aloud a section. Then anybody can comment briefly on how it helps to
write an accurate, significant, and verifiable story. Thereafter, another
person can read the next section and so on.
a. At your next video conference a week later, each person can read aloud
his or her story in up to 500 words. Thereafter anybody can comment
critically on how it was written and its most important contents: what the
writer identified as the most outrageous abuse by judges and their cronies.
b. All of you will realize that if the story is well written, its most
outrageous abuse can be stated in up to 500 words, which will grip
everybody’s attention; and if it is poorly written, nobody will pay
attention to the next 500 words.
c. This will be an opportunity for everybody to use group feedback to
revise their story and rehearse telling it either at a Commission “public
meeting” or an unprecedented citizens hearing. You will only have 500 words
and five minutes to tell your story and outrage the national public.
Revisions and rehearsals make perfect!
69. In addition, I offer to make a presentation on this article to you and
your group of guests followed by a Q&A session. It can take place via video
conference and, if in New York City, in person.
70. To ascertain the quality of my presentation, watch my video
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_judges_abuse_video.mp4>
and follow it on its slides
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_judges_abuse_slides.pdf>.
71. To schedule it and agree on its terms, use my contact information
below.
M. Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money
Lip service advances nothing;
it only maintains the current abuse.
Put your money
where your outrage at abuse and
passion for justice are.
Donate
to support the professional law research and writing, and
strategic thinking of
Judicial Discipline Reform
through* Paypal*
https://www.*paypal*
.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HBFP5252TB5YJ
<https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HBFP5252TB5YJ>
;
by making a deposit or an online transfer to Citi Bank,
routing # 021 000 089, account # 4977 59 2001;
or
by mailing a check to the address below.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform <http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>
2165 Bruckner Blvd.
Bronx, NY 10472-6506
tel. (718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.*linkedin*.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b>
*Dare trigger history!*…and you may enter it.
*NOTE*: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud
storage accounts described at *>ggl:1 et seq.
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>
and †>OL2:1114§G
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates2.pdf>,
when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email addresses and paste it
in the To: line of your email so as to enhance the chances of your email
reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
**********************************************
