I know rape is nothing new when it comes to jails, etc. Seeing the video at
the bottom (i shared it recently, from brian on his back up channel
greasemonkeyvideos) really made my stomach turn. A lot of things have been,
but I thought about how much it would make me sick to see it done to my mom
or dad so i put this together for who ever.
this is not legal advise, if you need legal advise seek competitant council
and be advised. record yourself saying or stapling to whatever essentially
[as this applies to most things you can think of] a challenge of
jurisdiction which can be done at any point in time [you also have 3 days
to rescind a contract pursuant to their regulation z of the truth in
lending act]:
mandatory judicial notice of law
notice to agent is notice to principle, notice to principle is notice to
agent
I'm a state citizen that composes the state¹, I have been crowned and I'm a
sole organ of the constitution for (name of your state here) state
republic, of which is under the preservation of both constitutions², "the
fountain of which all legitimate authority flows"³. I'm not within the
jurisdiction of the united states⁴ and I don't waive my immunity to be
sued⁵. one sovereign is to respect the law of the other, but a sovereign
has no superior and coercion is fraud⁶. I direct all contracts associated
with this matter terminated immediately.
sworn to without the united states⁷
by: (sign here)
---‐-----------------------------------------------
the following footnotes are your US supreme court cases, statutes, codes,
rules regulations etc, that you are required to follow by law. you can't
claim good faith immunity if you have been told your violating the law, you
also won't have clean hands if you're not doing your duty in good faith,
you may want to consider you may also not have immunity from action against
yourself for violating the law in your private capacity.
footnote 1: Justice McREYNOLDS: Chief Justice Chase, declared- [301 U.S.
548, 599] 'But the perpetuity and indissolubility of the Union, by no
means implies the loss of distinct and individual existence, or of the
right of self-government by the States. Under the Articles of Confederation
each State retained its sovereignty, freedom, and i
ndependence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right not expressly
delegated to the United States. Under the Constitution, though the powers
of the States were much restricted, still, all powers not delegated to the
United States, nor prohibited to the States, are reserved to the States
respectively, or to the people. And we have already had occasion to remark
at this term, that 'the people of each State compose a State, having its
own government, and endowed with all the functions essential to separate
and independent existence,' and that 'without the States in union, there
could be no such political body as the United States.' (Lane County v.
Oregon, 7 Wall. 71, 76). Not only, therefore, can there be no loss of
separate and independent autonomy to the States, through their union under
the Constitution, but it may be not unreasonably said that the preservation
of the States, and the maintenance of their governments, are as much within
the design and care of the Constitution as the preservation of the Union
and the maintenance of the National Government. The Constitution, in all
its provisions, looks to an indestructible Union, composed of
indestructible States.' steward mach. co. v davis 301 u.s 548. see also:
the young american or a book of government and law by s.g goodrich
incorporated herein in it's entirety by reference contains the 1817
constitution with the original art. 13. cases such as gamble v us also
point out the difference between a US citizen and a state citizen, as well
as the difference between the "dual sovereign".
footnote 2: Judge Cooley, in his work on Constitutional Limitations, said:
"The people, in a legal sense, must be understood to be those who, by the
existing Constitution, are crowned with political rights, and who, while
that instrument remains, will be the sole organs through which the will of
the body politic will be expressed." peter hand co v united states 2 F.2d
449
footnote 3: Justice GINSBURG, dissenting: In the system esta
blished by the Federal Constitution, howev
er, "ultimate sovereignty" resides in the governed. Arizona State
Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'n, 576 U.S. ___, ___,
135 S.Ct. 2652, 2675, 192 L.Ed.2d 704 (2015); Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 1
Wheat. 304, 324-325, 4 L.Ed. 97 (1816); Braun, supra, at 26-30. Insofar as
a crime offends the "peace and dignity" of a sovereign, Lanza, 260 U.S. at
382, 43 S.Ct. 141, that "sovereign" is the people, the "original fountain
of all legitimate authority," The Federalist No. 22, at 152 (A. Hamilton);
see Note, Double Prosecution by State and Federal Governments: Another
*1991 Exercise in Federalism, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1538, 1542 (1967). gamble v
us (2019).
footnote 4 and 6: GIBSON, Chief Justice (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania)
opinion of the Court: "Every highway, toll or free, is licensed,
constructed, and regulated by the immediate or delegated action of the
sovereign power, and in every commonwealth the people in the aggregate
constitute the sovereign. But it is the prerogative of a sovereign to be
exempt from coercion by action, for jurisdiction implies sovereignty, and a
sovereign can have no superior.". O'Connor v. Pittsburgh, 18 Pa. 187
(1851). (Same in 42 Pa.C.C. 579 (1914)).
footnote 5: A sovereign is exempt from suit not because of any formal
conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that
there can be no legal right as against the authority that makes the law on
which the right depends, and as this doctrine is not confined to full
sovereign powers, it extends to those, such as the territories of the
United States, which in actual administration originate and change the law
of contract and property. Kawananokoa v. Polyblank, 205 U.S. 349.
footnote 7: see your statutes and codes, know to you as 28 usc 1746.
if they drag u into court you, remind them that they just dragged the
united states into court rule 17(a)(2) rule 17(a)(1)(G), that you didn't
waive your sovereign immunit
y, and you direct all contracts to be terminate
d for fraud. see also their statutes and codes 42 usc 1981-1986 for just
the tip, and the fact that you're now a federal witness to a crime (with
matters attaining to civil rights and anti trust matters private attorney
general [learn some more about private attorney general in cases such as
newman v piggie park], the epa also allows the people to help more info on
to help specifically the environment against the thieves nsea.us). if they
dont do as you said, you need to report to the police, the attorney
general, another judge and/or possibly bring them in for yourself for a
bounty reward paid by the secretary of treasury. you also may want to ask
for all documents required to be on them and/or immediately presentable for
the officer(s) and judge to be in uniform to examine to makes sure it's
correct and filed properly.
Cop Sticks His Finger Up the You-Know-Where of an INNOCENT Man! (8:27)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=JN9LMIepbAc
