Richard,
I don't know how you could be "nicer," in dealing with, and trying to enlist
(?) the "creeps" (etc.!.) that you are dealing with, if not trying to, treat.. .
Excellent work in such respect. If this group doesn't cover all the bases I
don't know who does, in such regard.. .
Cheers.
Champion of Justice
So Really. Justice is for the Individual, where, politics is, what's wrong or
fundamentally wrong with groups if not most groups, (otherwise) I have found,
and do treat if not prosecute, (for what is better if not, best, or, true to
the matter.. .) How I Do.. . Understanding as much if not more is also y/our
responsibility if not, of our fundamentally responsibility, in such regard, of
what we "deserve," to providing what we need as is needed if not most, that all
would be, as good as things can be
I So, Got It and, Serve, if not "Live," Etc.. .
Or what?!.
BWE
On Sunday, November 28, 2021, 03:08:42 p.m. EST, cordero
<dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as widely
as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We the People; e.g.,
click “Reply All” and send.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register or + New
or Users >Add New.
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities when received, they crept in during transit and are beyond my
control. Kindly overlook them.
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
Dear Ms. T., Mr. C., Mr. R. and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Thank you for your emails.
I have sent you the article below at least twice. It is obvious that you have
not read it, which explains why you have no comment on it and sound so
dejected.
Had you bothered to read it, you would have learned the strategy that it lays
out to expose abusive judges.
Likewise, you would have learned that it is precisely major media outlets that
have exposed judges. Thereby they have unwittingly validated the analysis that
I have made in my study of judges and their judiciaries, cited below.
Whining is easy. However, it leads to no progress. It only perpetuates the
state of ineffectiveness, makes laziness comfortable, and renders the whiner
vulnerable. In the same vein, failure to read keeps in place the condition of
weakness deriving from ignorance, for it results in the opposite of the
aphorism: KNOWLEDGE IS POWER.
Therefore, I encourage you to read the article below. Reread it. Read it again
until you understand its out-of-court inform and outrage strategy for the
national public, including you, to be so stirred up as to force politicians,
lest they be voted out of, or not into, office, to empower the public to hold
judges accountable for their performance and liable to compensate the victims
of their abuse.
Thereafter, take action by sharing and posting the article to social media as
widely as possible. By so doing, you will be contributing to the holding by the
media and students and professors of the proposed unprecedented citizens
hearings, where people, including you, will have a chance to tell their stories
to the national public.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
******************************
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as widely
as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We the People; e.g.,
click “Reply All” and send.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register or + New
or Users >Add New.
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities when received, they crept in during transit and are beyond my
control. Kindly overlook them.
Webinar and story-writing Workshop
on
thinking and proceeding strategically
to attract the largest number of people and entities
with interests harmonious with ours and
turn them into our allies of results,
thereby increasing the chances of your telling the national public
your story of judges' abuse of power and financial criminality
at
unprecedentedcitizens
hearingshttp://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_thinking_strategically_to_gain_resullt_allies.pdf
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx A . Date and time of the webinar and workshop and means
of access
1. To attend the webinar and workshop via a Zoom meeting look for the date and
connection information by going to:
Judicial Discipline Reform at http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;.
2. You will benefit even more from the webinar and the workshop if you download
and read its slides in advance;
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_webinar&story_workshop_slides.pdf.
3. Support the professional law research and writing,and strategic thinking of
Judicial Discipline Reform, which has produced the webinar and workshop, and
their underlying 3-volume study of judges and their judiciaries: Exposing
Judges'Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting* †♣ 4. The articles and the studyhave
attracted so many webvisitors and elicited in them such a positivereaction that
40,380+ have becomesubscribers as of November 28, 2021(Appendix 3).
You too can subscribe to the articles by going to:
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register or
+ New or Users >Add New.
Donate
by making an online transfer
through the Bill Pay feature of your online account
or Zelle,
to Citi Bank, routing # 021 000 089, account # 4977 59 2001;
or TD Bank, routing # 260 13 673, account # 43 92 62 52 45 B. Thinking
strategically to attract thosewith interests harmonious with ours 5. The Wall
Street Journal (WSJ) published last September 28, 2021,the article "131 Federal
Judges Broke the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Hada Financial
Interest”(Appendix 6§C.22). The law requiring that theyrecuse themselves from
cases in which they have a financial interest is foundin Title28 of the U.S.
Code (of federallaw only) section 455. Disqualification of justice, judge, or
magistratejudge(28 USC §455). See also 28 USC §144. Bias or prejudice of judge.
6. Financial institutions, like so many otherinstitutions, cannot do harm to
anybody unless they obtain an order from ajudge. If judges did not abuse their
power, those institutions would beharmless. But every dispute ends up before
judges...even those involving thePresident and Congress. Judges are the ones
who wield the real power in ourcountry. 7. Financial institutions have an
interest inmaking judges compensate them for all the effort, time, and money
that thejudges made them waste and that the institutions will still have to
spend torelitigate cases where judges failed to recuse themselves due to
theirinterests in one of the parties, and disentangling contracts based on
decisionseven if only presumed to have been biased. 8. Accordingly, we,
Advocates of HonestJudiciaries, must think and proceed strategically. Let’s
expose thejudges...with the support of everybody and all entities that have
interestsharmonious with ours, including financial institutions. 9. We need to
be pragmatic: “The enemy of myenemy is my friend.” We must use our interests
harmonious with those of othersas the basis for turning them into our allies of
results. We need to make iteasy for financial institutions and all other
‘enemies’ of judges to drawcloser to us.
C. Expressing in our personal stories a“single issue” with common appeal 10.
The workshop teaches how to write in up to500 words your story of judges’ abuse
of power by applying the two-phase method, and sending it to theprovided email
addresses(id. >Appendix 7). You can follow theworkshop on its slides. 11.
Writing your stories is part of the pursuitof a well-defined, strategic
objective whose statement includes the clause “singleissue”: We, Advocates of
HonestJudiciaries, aim to implement an out-of-court inform and outrage strategy
for forming anational, single issue, apolitical, non-denominational movement
for judicialabuse of power exposure, compensation of abusees, and reform
throughtransformational change.
12. Hence, in my study and articles as well asthe webinars and story workshops,
we, the ones forming that movement, onlymention the issue of judges’ abuse of
power together with the one raised by TheWall Street Journal(¶3 above),that is,
criminality of federal judges, the only ones withnational jurisdiction, thus
capable of affecting the national public. 13. Those who can break financial
laws canbreak any law and disregard any due process requirements. Federal
judges’ financialcriminality involves the following crimes:
1) conflict of interests resolved in self-interest
2) breach of contractfor judicial services
3) embezzlement of public power for personal gain
4) fraud on the partiesand the court
5) concealmentof assets
6)tax evasion
7)money laundering
8)breach of the oath of office
9) intentionaldisruption of business relations (contracts foreseeably based on
biaseddecisions)
10) intentional wasteand misuse of public property and resources
11) filing misleadingand false mandatory annual financial disclosure reports
under the Ethics inGovernment Act of 1978(App. to 5 USC)
12) dereliction of dutyrequiring the judges on the all-judge-Committee on
Financial Disclosures-appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court- of
the Judicial Conferenceof the U.S., 28 USC §331-which is presided overby the
Chief- to review with due diligence financial disclosure reports filedwith the
Committee
13) breach of thereporting duty under 18 USC §3057 -Title 18 contains the
federal Criminal Code- on any judge “having reasonablegrounds for believing
[which is a standard lower than “probable cause tobelieve” and much lower than
“evidence”] that any violation under chapter 9 [onbankruptcy, the
classification of over 70% of all cases filed in the FederalJudiciary] of this
title [18] or other laws of the United States relating toinsolvent debtors,
receiverships or reorganization plans has been committed, orthat an
investigation should be had in connection therewith [which lowers thestandard
below, and precedes, “having reasonable grounds for believing”]
14) implicit orexplicit conspiracy to cover the crime of a principal by not
reporting him, where-byshe who so covered him became an accessory after the
fact, thus facilitatingthe principal’s commission of another crime in reliance
on the assurance thatshe would likewise not report him, whereby she became
accessory before the factand a party to the complicit mutual protection
agreement that he would coverfor her if she committed a crime.
14. We must attract people who have evenopposite views on all sorts of issues.
All are welcome. We need all of them.All must recognize the wisdom of the
strategy of the Tea Party (TaxedEnough Already). The people who got together in
itslocal chapters, many of which started in somebody’s backyard, discussed
onesingle issue: the reduction of taxes and its corollary, to wit, the
oppositionto any new tax. We want to show the same capacity for strategic
thinking andproceeding. 15. Financial institutions as well as otherlarge
companies are the ones most likely to suffer the implications of the TheWall
Street Journal’s exposure of judges’ concealed bias-causing financialinterests
in those institutions’ stock. Those institutions will have torelitigate cases
presided over by financially-interested, not impartial judges:Not only
particular decisions that they made may be impugned, but also theirintegrity in
general. a. A motion to recuse a judge willpoint out that the probable cause to
believe that he engaged individually inrogue conduct is supported by the
evidence of collective, coordinated conductas a member of a judiciary that
lacks institutional integrity: The judiciaryitself has gone rogue. The common
cause is judges’ and their judiciaries’unaccountability, which makes their
abuse for their own gain and convenience riskless. 16. Those institutions will
be harmedfinancially by the challenge to contracts based on decisions taken by
biasedjudges: unscrambling those contracts will cost a lot of effort, time,
andmoney. a. Who is going topay for all that?! Judges made the Catholic Church
pay for the harmcaused by its pedophilic priests. That will be a precedent
invoked to hold theFederal Judiciary liable for its judges' financial crimes.
17. It is reasonable to expect those so challengingcontracts to want to openly
join or discreetly support our proposal for allparties already and even yet to
be harmed but in need now of an assurance ofimpartiality to collectively demand
compensation from judges for their failureto recuse themselves and from their
judiciaries for their failure to supervisethem with due diligence. It follows
that all of them and we have harmonious interests.Even if driven by different
or divergent motives, we can become allies ofresults. 18. Thus, we welcome and
even invite all sortsof institutions and other individuals to our webinars and
story workshops. Theyare the ones who have the connections to bring along
journalists or addresstheir attention to us. In turn, journalists are the ones
who have the means ofinforming the national public of ourwebinars and
workshops, and of outraging it at judges’ abuse of power and
financialcriminality. D. A professor and his/her colleagues andstudents can
launch the proposed unprecedentedcitizens hearings 19. A professor can invite
his/her former andcurrent colleagues and students to attend the webinar and
workshop, for whichthey only need the Zoom link(paragraph 1 above). That is the
most direct way of showing them why and how they,academics and their
universities, together with journalists and their mediaoutlets, can be
instrumental in setting in motion the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings.
20. Thereafter the students and professors-e.g., of journalism, law, business,
IT, and social sciences- can organize thevideo conference aspects and
advertising of a webinar for their peers where Ican lay out how they can take
the lead in their university and amonguniversities –as students at Harvard and
Yale did in opposingthe confirmation of Then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh– in picking
up the investigationof judges’ criminality and abuse of power where the
findings of The WallStreet Journal(¶3 above),Thomson Reuters, The Boston Globe,
International Consortium ofInvestigative Journalists (publishers of Pandora
Papers), and Senator ElizabethWarren left them off. 21. The citizens hearings
will give studentsand professors the opportunity to invite everybody who has a
story of abuse byjudges that they have suffered or witnessed to tell it to the
national public. Manystories can be auditedin search for patterns of abuse and
criminality. Thereafter, the findings can bepublished in a report, as the 9/11
Commission did and the Biden Commission onthe reform of the Supreme Court will
soon do. 22. Professors and students already publishlaw reviews and other
professional journals in their fields. They can publish areport that will be
the first of its class, where academics act as anindependent inspector general
of the Federal Judiciary and its state counterparts.That Judiciary has fiercely
and successfully opposed such an inspector, for itcould expose how the
Judiciary protects itself by abusing its self-disciplinepower to ensure
self–exoneration by dismissing 100% ofcomplaints filed against its judges and
denying 100% ofpetitions to review their dismissals. 23. The publication of
their report can alsotake a novel form: the first-ever, and national,
multidisciplinary, multimediaand on-site conference through which academics and
journalists will be Pioneering the news and publishing field ofjudicial
unaccountability reporting. 24. By launching the unprecedented citizens
hearings, students and professorswill lead We the People, the Masters of all
public servants, in holdingjudicial public servants accountable for their
exercise of the public powerentrusted to them for the People’s benefit and
liable to compensate thevictims of their abuse of power and financial
criminality.
25. To promote the holding of the unprecedented citizens hearings, you will be
able to send your story to people in a position to hold them by emailing it to
the following two blocs of email addresses:
To: [the members of theBiden Commission on the reform of the Supreme Court]
cristina.rodriguez@xxxxxxxx, robert.bauer@xxxxxxx,
kandrias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,jack.balkin@xxxxxxxx,RBauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,baude@xxxxxxxxxxxx,madams@xxxxxx,charles@xxxxxxxxxxxx,acrespo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,wdellinger@xxxxxxx,ecb95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,justin.driver@xxxxxxxx,rfallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,heather.k.gerken@xxxxxxxx,
ngertner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,jgoldsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,tgriffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,tgrove@xxxxxxxxxx,bhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,mkang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,ojohns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,lacroix@xxxxxxxxxxxx,lemos@xxxxxxxxxxxx,levi@xxxxxxxxxxxx,staff@xxxxxxxxxxxx,trevor.morrison@xxxxxxx,
cnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,rick.pildes@xxxxxxx,mramsey@xxxxxxxxxxxx,krooseve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,bross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,d-strauss@xxxxxxxxxxxx,tribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,awhite36@xxxxxxx,kewhitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,michael.waldman@xxxxxxx,
caroline.fredrickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
development@xxxxxxxxxxxx,Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, cc: [journalists,
students,and professors] James.Grimaldi@xxxxxxx,Coulter.Jones@xxxxxxx,
Joe.Palazzolo@xxxxxxx, contact@xxxxxxxx, gryle@xxxxxxxx, fshiel@xxxxxxxx,
investigations@xxxxxxxx, insiders@xxxxxxxx, info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Elizabeth_Warren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,john.shiffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
michael.berens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,blake.morrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,marketresearch.thomsonreuters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,“Todd
Wallack” <twallack@xxxxxxxxx>,patricia.wen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, “editor Brian
McGrory”<brian.mcgrory@xxxxxxxxx>, newstip@xxxxxxxxx,spotlight@xxxxxxxxx,
charles.ornstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,tracy.weber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,“Veterans Today
senior editor Gordon Duff” <gpduf@xxxxxxx>,“Veterans Today managing editor Jim
W Dean” <jimwdean@xxxxxxx>, ajaffe@xxxxxxxxxxx, Thehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
newsletters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
mderienzo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,emily.holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,tips@xxxxxxxxxxx,
ryan.grim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Evan.Allen@xxxxxxxxx,
info@xxxxxx, ginger.thompson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,mcnulaj@xxxxxxxxxxx,
MCoyle@xxxxxxx, communication@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,aglantz@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
inytletters@xxxxxxxxxxx, info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, aturturro@xxxxxxx,
Opencourt@xxxxxxx, letters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Matt.Rocheleau@xxxxxxxxx,
oped@xxxxxxxxxxx, Jackie.Botts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,hello@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Jaimi.Dowdell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Vernal.Coleman@xxxxxxxxx,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx, NTotenberg@xxxxxxx, Brendan.McCarthy@xxxxxxxxx, E.
Every meaningful cause needs resources forits advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money 26. Lip service
advances nothing; but it continues to enable the abusers. DONATE to support the
professionallaw research and writing, andstrategic thinkingof
Judicial Discipline Reform by making a deposit or anonline transfer
through the Bill Pay feature of your online account
or Zelle,
to Citi Bank, routing # 021000 089, account # 4977 59 2001; or TD Bank,
routing # 260 13673, account # 43 92 62 52 45
|
|
Dare trigger history!...and you may enter it.
Sincerely, Dr. RichardCordero, Esq.
JudicialDiscipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b NOTE: Given ;
theinterference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described
at*>ggl:1 et seq. and †>OL2:1114§G, when emailinghim, copy the above bloc of
his email addresses and paste it in the To: line ofyour email so as to enhance
the chances of your email reaching him at least atone of those
addresses.*************************
