[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: United States v. Barnett

  • From: NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 20:32:19 +0000

Thanks.

My point is that appears that a public official is not entitled to a jury trial 
in a federal prosecution for official misconduct.

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

________________________________
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Tim 
<tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 4:16:24 PM
To: NELSON DICE <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: United States v. Barnett

The case was against public officials, under oath, disobeying a court order.
Are you a public official, under oath, disobeying a court order?
Nobody can cancel your rights.
Many are happy to trick you to abandon your rights.

Monday, March 22, 2021, 6:45:37 AM, you wrote:

does United States v. Barnett say there is no federal right to a jury trial for 
disobeying an administrative court order

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/376/681/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupreme.justia.com%2Fcases%2Ffederal%2Fus%2F376%2F681%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7C4a3318a8028f4f363dd808d8ed70271c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637520413232020574%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=nWyQjGiy4fF985VtDBlv7lToA6MkKWGyjUHXV0yxHIo%3D&reserved=0>






Timmy
At Liberty and Peace
Expressly Reserving All Rights and Liberties
tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Other related posts: