Trump may be prosecuted for incitement, experts say
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Trump may be prosecuted for incitement, experts say
An abundance of evidence exists on which to make a factual determination about
his responsibility in the Jan. 6 ...
|
|
|
I don't mind Trump having to go to court for evidence to be provided to the
charge(s) and Trump having to answer to them, as long as the "government" (of
politics, but what else) takes the responsibility to do so and "pays" for such
litigation (and not have him shut up, communication-wise... [Or what would we
be actually good for, of the behavior if not therapy that matters, of such
example?] if he should have to go to jail) or I figure the government (if not
all governments, not So true) would be guilty of "process abuse" (what I found
Trump to be especially if not actually guilty of, otherwise, yes) and an
abrogation/dereliction of their (as Our) ultimate responsibility in such
respect.
But where do you ever get that with corrupt and corrupting (abusive) politics
if not government, if not government, otherwise? Canada (if not the readership
here, and the Globe, too) should also if not especially heed as much, (Yes)
that it would be considered legitimate, to "justice" (and what a country, etc.,
should be good for) and/or such service, if not merely such justice and what we
say in such respect.
Don't be digressing to my grammatical irregularities, as for such, perfection,
please
Michael Glavic
Champion of such things and movement/action.