[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Taking on the narrow-minded and limiting if not abusive and "really" unjust, how I figure I Do.. .

From: "Don Mashak" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "donmashak" for DMARC)
To: "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 05:40:45 +0000 (UTC)

Harvard Law Dumps US Constitution & La ley de Harvard Elimina la Constitución
de EE UU
https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2021/03/06/harvard-law-dumps-us-constitution-la-ley-de-harvard-elimina-la-constitucion-de-ee-uu/

Those were my thoughts.

Thank you for your time.

In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

    On Friday, March 5, 2021, 7:34:07 PM CST, Aéius Cercle of
Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...just a FYI to add since the history of many
words and their original usages have been long-forgotten... largely and
obviously because of things like book-burning, genocide, authoritarianism,
dis-information campaigns, spiritual-wickedness in high places, and pretty much
all manners of deception, etc.:
«Kids - sometimes used by the “ignorant” when speaking of their children. For
in the “past” the goat was the symbol of the Devil, thus those “of” the dark
one used this terminology when speaking of their offspring in the centuries
between AD & BT [sic {I think he meant to type A.D. & B.C.}], when the false
five pointed “starr” was in “vogue,” none seeing that it was the symbol of the
Devil that man had “permitted” to replace the six pointed true light
star.»-Quoted from The Messiah's writings at
http://the-testament-of-truth.co.uk/truth/web/air.htm
------ Original Message ------From: "Charley Dan" <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>To:
"administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
administrating-your-public-servants@freelists.orgSent: 2021-03-05 12:05:34
PMSubject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Taking on the
narrow-minded and limiting if not abusive and "really" unjust, how I figure I
Do.. .

How many talk to the kid to know and influence their life?On Mar 5, 2021, 12:03
PM -0700, Paul M <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote:

Too many schools public and private have become nothing more that babysitters.
How many parents visit their child's school and sit in a class to know what is
being taught? How many attend PTA meetings? How many parents help their kids
with homework or even check their report card?There are too many distractions
now-a-days.

On Thursday, March 4, 2021, 12:26:03 PM CST, Michael Glavic
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You folks are "great," (of my, style?!. of "Content," or substance, as of The,
So Substantial and Liberating and, Way, of actual thinking, Objective thinking,
Etc.) for being receptive (if not flattering..) to such vast intelligence of,
choice/s (that moves the matter, as it should?!. BWE) whatever other choices
(etc.) there should be, but, my figuring, "none," otherwise. Figure I behave,
accordingly.. .
Where else do we get such, intelligent choices as a "group" (?) if not for what
is best, I can't think of at the moment.. .
Please do handle yourself (if not everything) in such respect, or, whatever, go
where you go and be part of the, lesser, (what I think of, and understand of
things, otherwise) that I can "So," handle as I Do, in such respect.. .
Michael Glavic
Champion of such, "satisfaction," Etc., and, So balancing if not righting of
the human mess or, condition and conditioning, otherwise.. .
Treat "school," (So treat school, etc.) otherwise, or even  eliminate it, for
what is better if not, (So) best.. .
Don't send your kids to any "school" (etc.) otherwise, or, get what you get if
not  already got? .. . but certainly, So certainly, of not So much  or what
they could be good for, of such, "justice," (of intelligent choice/s) justice
to me defining what anything and everything is "good for" if not, what is truly
best and what Everything is all about, including, how It (The Universal?!.)
operates, (as for what) in such respect
Cheers? Or what? .. .  Take on the true dunces, and worse, why don't you.. . Go
For It.. It will make for an even better world, how it, and serving true
justice does.. .
I So "Get It," (and serve, as deliver, what matters) and hope you might to in
such respect
BWE
On Thursday, March 4, 2021, 12:01:05 p.m. EST, Michael Glavic
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello,
To serve "justice," is what everyone can and should be doing (is universal?.)
regardless of official roles or, politics, and our language or grammar or
spelling, if not what have we, or have we, otherwise (My understanding in the
same breath, that the extreme left-wing, of socialism is probably or logically
as bad as the extreme right-wing, of socialism, (but what else) or politics, if
you, Will, So  to get our definitions if not The definitive (to as much)
"correct/right," (screwing, or treating the legal and political class,
otherwise, On The way.. .) if not everything correct/right, in such respect.. .
Or what? Your failed and failing, literature, (If not goals, of society?) etc.,
as of the priority? .. . "No thanks." You'd be "wrong," as I Feel you are (but
for how long.. .) otherwise
My take on as much, also thanks to "Meghan Markle" who responded to the
monarchy's narrow/narrower definitions, if not duties, responsibilities, and or
interests/subjects, if not, oppressiveness.. .
"To serve is universal regardless of official roles." Yup, that's what I
gathered she said.. .
Probably, Logically deferential if not attributable to the "true" constitution
and/or, Constitutional  in such respect... do you think, So much, or have you
thought, really thought, So far? (of such, Wondering?.) Here's more than,
merely hoping So, in a/the world of crap, if not worse, otherwise, but what
else.. . See me for that
How I deal with the mud or crap, or lesser.. . that is mostly of "conditioning"
(repeated abuses, not of The reasonable or for even greater reasoning, as to as
much) if not our condition, otherwise, or, not So, cognitive and correct, (and
correcting!) including socially (if not ecologically) correct, somewhat in
a/the our world or abuse  and hurt, otherwise..
You do need to be faithful and reasonably tough, in the face of abuse, to deal
with if not eliminate it. I find our legal and political system to be, to
a/the/our failure /limitation/s, otherwise.. We are getting to the "evidence,"
of what matters to Understandingmore and The service  of Justice in such
respect, which part (of what we are doing if not merely some of us are doing,
in such respect) I find not to be wanting or compromising, in such regard.
Don't be wasting so much, "whatever," (time and effort, etc.) on language or
getting what you say correct, (etc.) to be furthering  what matters and is So
correct and correcting if not perfect  in such regard
That should especially help you with Our mission if not your mission.. . I'm So
sure.
I So "get it," and Understand, (of such more, including of such, "choice") and
serve, what else there might be if not logically is to it, and how it or things
should be arranged or organized, to be, better done or, done at All.. .

I'm not into the popularity contests of dunces, or any contest, for that
matter.. .
Cheers, in such regard.
Michael Glavic
Champion of the literature (Etc.) that matters, if not merely to me.. .
Champion of Justice in such respect.
If you can't understand that, try something else ('You" try, of my if not Our,
being  So On Top Of Things?.) So, that you can, if not, to be all that you, and
We can be, if not merely in such respect. Of such choices, Etc. Am I
So What?.

Follow-Ups:
- [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Taking on the narrow-minded and limiting if not abusive and "really" unjust, how I figure I Do.. .
  - From: Michael Glavic

References:
- [administrating-your-public-servants] Taking on the narrow-minded and limiting if not abusive and "really" unjust, how I figure I Do.. .
  - From: Michael Glavic
- [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Taking on the narrow-minded and limiting if not abusive and "really" unjust, how I figure I Do.. .
  - From: Michael Glavic
- [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Taking on the narrow-minded and limiting if not abusive and "really" unjust, how I figure I Do.. .
  - From: Paul M
- [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Taking on the narrow-minded and limiting if not abusive and "really" unjust, how I figure I Do.. .
  - From: Law-Division

[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Taking on the narrow-minded and limiting if not abusive and "really" unjust, how I figure I Do.. .

Other related posts: