THE AMERICAN BULLETIN - December 1997 - 13
CLEARFIELD TRUST CO. VS. U.S. 318 U.S. 363-371 (1942) - This case explains
what is now known as:
**THE CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE**
"Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take
on the characteristics of a mere private citizen. (Where
private corporate [FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES] commercial paper and securities
is concerned) For purposes of suit, such
corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate
from government." Bank of US vs Planters Bank, 9 Weaton
(22 US) 904 6 L.E.D. 24.
"When government enter the world commerce, they are subject to the same
burdens as any private firm or corporation." United
States vs Burr, 309 U.S. 242.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Patriotic Americans Take Notice!
The Clearfield Trust Co. vs. United States, 318 U.S. 363 is a 1942 case,
and therefore important to patriotic Americans, because
it is a public policy decision, following after the changes in the legal
system in 1938 by the Erie R.R. vs. Tompkins case, where
earlier decisions of the Supreme Court based upon public law, are not
honored in Court of Legislative nature, created to
administer the bankruptcy of the nation in behalf of the corporate
government's creditors. The use of private commercial paper
(debt currency or Federal Reserve Notes) removes the sovereignty status of
governments of We, The People, and reduces them to
an "entity", rather than a government, and like any corporation or person,
an entity cannot compel performance on its corporate
statutes or corporation rules unless it, like any other corporation rules
unless it, like any other corporation, is the "holder-in-due-
course" of some contract or commercial agreement between it, and the one
who demands for performance are made, and is
willing to produce said document, and to enter same into evidence before
trying to enforce its demands (called statutes).
The following is from a letter sent to friend, but contained therein may be
information of interest to all Americans!
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dear Friend:
Your calling my attention to the exceedingly broad definition of the term:
"Person" in our latest issue of Black's 6th Law
Dictionary is appreciated, because, with that awareness, we now realize the
need to pin our "wolf" adversary down in every legal
situation as to his precise meaning whenever he uses that term, or reads
that term in some statute that, he asserts, is directed to
include us in its demands or in its limitations upon our freedom.
We will all be presumed to be U.S. citizens (1) by the bureaucrats employed
in the administration of our corporate nation's
bankruptcy, unless, we might remain outside of the "pledge" made by the
administrators of the respective state governments
(acting in the corporate capacity), wherein they, without power of attorney
from anyone, pledged the life, labor and property of
their citizenry as SURETY for the debt obligations of the Legislative
Democracy created by Article I Section *, Clause 17 of our
National Constitution. Without offering the alert citizenry of remedy from
consequences of the "Administrative Presumption"
that the citizenry would be behind the State Administrators in the above
pledge, those administrators could be charged with
"fraud." So, to cover their back end from such charges from the handful of
alert "sui juris" sovereigns, who might object to
having their life, labor and property pledged as "surety" for an equitable
debt obligation in private commercial paper which
Congress could borrow in the name of the United states, which that
"entity", created by Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 calls itself,
as distinct from the Union of states now referred as "America', and the
citizenry thereof as "American" rather than as "United
states Citizen", the State Administrators offered a remedy, which is now in
Code from and accepted by all State governments
acting in their corporate capacity, to those who wish to exercise it. That
remedy is in the Uniform Commercial Code at Article I,
section 207, and, to those exercising said remedy, Article I, Section 103.6
guarantees their former sui juris status under the
common Law, even though they are forced to make private commercial debt
paper the medium of exchange for each of a lawful
medium in substance of gold or silver coin.
[NOTE: Article 1-207 has been changed to Article 1-308]
I believe the above paragraph explains why one who has exercised the remedy
in the U.S.S. Code does not have his former status
compromised through his forced exchanges in debt instruments, also known as
'The Uniform Doctrine of Commercial Notes' (i.e.
federal reserve notes!).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
(1) California Gov. C. Section 243,
United States citizens: A citizen of the United States who is not a citizen
of the State, has the same rights and duties as a citizen
of the State not an elector. [Stats 1943, c 134, p. 902, Section 273,]
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Source; A Friend, otherwise-unknown. Published in ----- 1997 issue of the
American's Bulletin c/o P.O. Box 3096, Central Point,
Oregon state [97502]. Permission granted to copy, post or use as handouts
or a 'flyer' for educational purposes so long as it
appears in its entirety including this postscript.Supporting References:
AntiCorruptionSociety.com; Source Documents: Articles of Incorporation of
UNITED STATES
CORPORATION COMPANY
AntiCorruptionSociety.com; home page; The Great American Adventure by Judge
Dale, retired.
Excerpts:
Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they
are a
fiction and only exist on paper.
Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private
corporate
regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal
their true
nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You bet they do!
Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or
enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which
are
duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts
requires
signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to
be
arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter,
did you ever
agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their
corporate
regulations?
Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law
enforcement
officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public
and
these officers can be held personally liable for their actions.
AntiCorruptionSociety.com; home page; Our Government is Just Another
Corporation
