[administrating-your-public-servants] How you can write and revise your story of judicial unaccountability & guardianship abuse for the Biden Commission on the Supreme Court and the unprecedented citizens hearings

From: "cordero" <dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "dr.richard.cordero_esq" for DMARC)
To: "GrendelReport@xxxxxxxxx" <GrendelReport@xxxxxxxxx>, "Keepamericagreat@xxxxxxxxx" <Keepamericagreat@xxxxxxxxx>, "crow_syndicate@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <crow_syndicate@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "CTRL@xxxxxxxxx" <CTRL@xxxxxxxxx>, "sdipn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sdipn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "americonscience-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <americonscience-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Americonscience@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Americonscience@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 03:10:59 +0000 (UTC)

NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of thisemail.
             You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as widely
as possible in your owninterest and that of the rest of We the People; e.g.,
click “Reply All” and send.
            To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel ↓Register   or   +New
or   Users   >Add New.
              The article belowhad a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities when received,they crept in during transit and are beyond my
control. Kindly overlook them.

Writing your story of abuse by judges and guardians in up to 500 words by
applying the two-phase method; and using it fordemanding that the Biden
Commission on Supreme Court reformhear your testimony at its “public meetings”;
andasking universities and the media,such as the news agencies Reuters, The
Boston Globe,
Propublica, and The Washington Post,to let the national public hear you by
holding the proposedunprecedented citizens hearings

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_method_for_writing_your_story.pdf

By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.Ph.D., University ofCambridge, EnglandM.B.A.,
University of Michigan Business SchoolD.E.A., La Sorbonne, ParisJudicial
Discipline ReformNew York
Cityhttp://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.orgDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx ;
, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx

A. Telling your story at the most opportune time: when peoplewant to hear it

1. This article lays out a two-phase methodfor you to write in up to 500 words
the story of the abuse of power by judgesthat you have suffered or witnessed.
2. Your effort in writing your story willpay off, for you will be doing so at
the most opportune time: when the public,journalists, universities, and even
many politicians want to hear about thosestories in the context of what will
soon dominate the national debate: theCommission nominated by President Biden
on April 9, 2021, to study waysof reforming the Supreme Court; and the
desireattributed to him and his party “to pack the Supreme Court”, that is,
toincrease the number of justices from 9 to 15 and reduce their
life-appointmentto a term of years.

B. Composing an informative and brief story to be read, heard,and investigated

3. You want to tell the national public yourstory of judges’ abuse of power and
make the public share your outrage at it.You also want your story to be
investigated by journalists.
4. But nobody is going to read the scores,never mind hundreds, of pages
generated by your case in court to figure outwhat your story is all about.

5. Moreover, at a hearing you will haveonly 5 minutes to tell your story...a
rambling account will not hold theattention of the audience even that long.
6. In addition, journalists will not investigatea story that is confusing and
missing key pieces of information so that itfails to pique their curiosity and
makes them feel that it would not interesttheir own audience. Therefore, you
will benefit from applyingthe method set forth below for writing an informative
and brief story. You willuse it to rehearse your oral delivery of it at a
hearing.

C. Not a professionally written story, but written afterdoing one’s homework

7. Research your own documents and citethem so that your story is accurate and
verifiable.
8. Write a story that is significant to theaudience: You are not writing a
diary for your private reading. You are writinga story to be read by others,
your audience. Organize it chronologically sothat it can be easily followed by
people who are totally unfamiliar with youand it.
9. Highlight the most outrageous events andavoid getting bogged down in details
unimportant to the story even if they areimportant to you. After reading it,
your audience should be able to exclaim:‘The judge in this story did A, B, and
C. How outrageous!”
10. Edit your writing to make it asgrammatically correct as you can so that the
audience’s attention isconcentrated on your story without grammatical mistakes
distracting it and reflectingpoorly on your degree of education and attention
to detail.
11. Your objectives are clear: Youraccurate and verifiable story earns you the
respect and trust of your audience.Its significance to them earns you their
gratitude. All this may makes you attainyour most important objective: your
audience’s action in support of your cause.
12. Your audience’s support will be morelikely and stronger if you apply to the
writing of your story a principle ofstrategic thinking: “People never listen so
attentively and react so positivelyas when they listen to avoid harm to
themselves and their loved ones.”
13. Make your audience feel that the abuseby judges that you suffered or
witnessed can happen to them too. They can fallprey to the abusers. “No! That
isunacceptable. That is outrageous! I must support this victim to end this
abusebefore it gets me!”

D. You need intermediaries to bring your story to thenational public

14. That must be the reaction of yourultimate audience: the national public.
Only that public, informed about, andoutraged at, judges' unaccountability
andriskless abuse of power, can force the reform not only of the Supreme
Court,but also the lower federal court and even the state courts. Your story
alonewill not attain that objective, but it must contribute to attaining it.
15. To tell your story to the nationalpublic you need the Biden Commission as
well as journalists and universities tobecome interested in it and let you use
their means for publicizing it.
16. So, it is shortsighted andcounterproductive to disparage the media. They
are not your enemies. They areyour loudspeakers. They do not form a monolithic
entity. There are thousands ofmedia outlets and tens of thousands of
journalists. Not all of them have thesame point of view, means, or standing:

a. The New York Timesand The Washington Post do not behavethe same way as a new
outfit with a handful of journalists trying tobreakthrough in the world of
digital investigations.

17. Yet, they share a common interest: theircommercial and reputational
advancement. In addition, they can pick and chooseamong the scores of millions
of people who have been abused by judges. You needjournalists more than they
need you. Treat all of them with respect. That isrequired by ethical
considerations, professional standards, and strategicthinking.

E. Advice on story writing tested and applied successfully

18. I have applied the advice given here to producemy three-volume study of
judges and their judiciaries. The study rests onprofessional law research and
writing, and strategic thinking. It is titled anddownloadable thus:
ExposingJudges' Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Abuse of
Power:Pioneeringthe news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability and
abuse reporting* † ♣

♣ Volume 3:
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf ;

from OL3:1144. This article is at OL3:1329.

i. Open the downloaded files using Adobe AcrobatReader, which is available for
free.

19. This article is also posted to my website JudicialDiscipline Reform at
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. It and similar ones have attracted ;
so many webvisitors and the latterhave reacted to them so positively that
39,103+ have become subscribersto it as of July 15, 2021(Appendix3).
20. How many law firms, never mind lawyers,do you know who have a website with
so many subscribers?
21. You can join the subscribers thus: go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel ↓Register  or   + New
or   Users   >AddNew.

F. The two-phase writing method

     1. In phase one, use your unrestrained creative spirit todraft your story

22. In the end you want to produce a storythat flows smoothly into your
audience’s mind and that is accurate,significant, and verifiable. But at the
beginning, there is the big bang ofstory creation: The story bursts out of your
mind chaotically onto a computer page(or paper). Anything makes its way out.
Nothing is subjected to critical thoughtcontrols. If it pops up, jot it down.
23. Sit at your computer and write on aword processing page whatever word,
term, or phrase identifies a person, event,place, document, thing, idea,
concept, etc., apparently associated with yourstory. They are your story’s
informational dots. Each opens a crack inyour mind and lets other escape.
24. You are not yet trying to writegrammatically correct and complete
sentences. You only want to get startedtelling your story. Blurt anything and
everything onto the page.
25. Let your stream of consciousness bubble outunrestrained by your thinking
mind so that it sprinkles dots of yourstory all over the page. As related
words, terms, and phrases flow out of yourmind, keep adding them to or between
the other dots on the page.
26. Widen and multiply the cracks in yourmind by asking yourself about your
story the journalists’ W-questions: What!?Who? Where? When? How? Why? What now?
27. Keep asking of every word, term, phrase,and sentence concerning an event:
“then what happened?...and thenwhat did they say?...and then what did I
do?...and then...?”They are alive in your mind. They can hear and answer you.
They can even askyou questions.
28. If informational dots or you ask questionsthat you cannot answer right
away, only jot them down. Do not interrupt the fireworksof dots. Let it rip!
Enjoy. Search for answers and evaluate their significance inphase two.
Gradually questions will become more complex:

a. What was the name of the opposing party’s attorney?...andher law firm?

b. Did the judge issue an oral order from the bench or did heread one that he
had written? Did he cite any law or rule?

c. Why did the judge order me to pay rent because the landlordhad fixed the
plumbing? I never told him; and the landlord never filed ananswer! So how did
the judge know? Did she confused me with another tenant? Howmany times has this
landlord or his lawyer appeared before this judge?...Mmm.I’ll have to look into
this later on.

29. When you have about ten informational dots,move them up and down in a rough
chronological order of appearance in yourstory. As you do so, add to them any
other words, terms, and phrases thatenlarge their meaning, identify them more
narrowly, or should be insertedbetween them.
30. Keep reading the dots, even aloud.Put them in a jingle, make them rhyme
even if they make no sense...and theywill come alive!, dancing in your mind and
inviting to dance other words,terms, and phrases that are also dots. Let them
jump onto the stage of yourpage.
31. Something like sentences will begin toappear. Keep ordering them
chronologically and inserting more dotsbetween them or enlarging them with
details.
32. Painting by numbers, using stars to draw aconstellation, you are connecting
the dots into the sketch of afigure. It seems to be telling a story...your
story! You can do this. You didit! You are telling your story!
33. Use a ‘balancing test’ to compare the dots’weight of outrageousness for the
story to make sense and be significant tothem: the ones who do not know you or
your story. Remove to another page dotsthat feel of ‘lighter’ significance. You
are starting to recognize a hierarchyamong the dots. That will help you stay
within the 500-word limit. Combine thedots into rough sentences.
34. HOURS later you will feel that you havetold your story from beginning to
end. Let it sit for a day. You are not done,not even close: You only wrote your
first draft. But you did!

     2. In phase two, use your critical judgment to edit yourstory

35. Come back to your draft and read itthrough. Only thereafter start moving
around and connecting the sentences in away that will make sense to a person
who does not know anything about it.
36. Avoid confusing your audience: Usethe same word to refer to the same
person, idea, event, object, etc. Doublecheck your dates; the names of places,
people, and their titles. Make sure whosaid what to whom. Do not trust your
memory. Case and other documents. Researchthe law to provide citations.
Journalists will check them and you must ensurethat they can verify them. Be
accurate.
37. Right now you are writing for an audienceof journalists. They are
knowledgeable, critical, and demanding. But they donot know anything about your
story. Do not assume that they can fill in thedetails that you left out that
are necessary for your story to make sense tothem.
38. Try to the best of your ability to tellthem a story that persuades them of
the outrageousness of unaccountable judges’riskless abuse of power. But do not
be melodramatic; do not exaggerate.
39. Never make up details. Always make aclear distinction between facts,
opinion, and impressions. Admit that you donot know what you do not know. You
may be able to tell a lie as to a dot hereor there.
40. But journalists look at the whole picture and realize how false dotsdo not
fit in. Lie-ridden mouths are not invited to tell their story.
41. Even ifyou did not intend to provide false details, as when lying, but your
details areincorrect for failure to check them against documents and other
sources, youbecome an unreliable storyteller. You lose credibility. Never
compromise it.
42. Self-editing means revising andrewriting your draft story; and correcting
your grammar and the position ofparagraphs, sentences, and clauses. It will
take longer than drafting it: Dotswere connected into a sketch. Now you are
painting the sketch with the colorsof accuracy, verifiability, and significance
that reveal the outrageousness ofthe abuse of power of the judges in your story.

a. What to omit

43. Abstain from outbursts intended toelicit pity and appeal for commiseration.
Do not appear emotionally fragile,unstable, or hypersensitive. Do not come
across as a basket case.
44. Do not dilute your story’s significancewith trivial details and petty
grievances. A barrage of charges betraysincapacity to identify what is legally
relevant. Do not diminish thecredibility of your story with unfounded
accusations, speculation, andextravagant claims. Trying to turn your experience
into a nightmare does notmake for a serious story; you are not scripting a
horror movie.
45. Do notimpair your story’s verifiability by making unprovable claims.
Fantasyallegations make your story a fairy tale. Let independentinvestigators
reveal what coming from a party –and as such biased toward herside of the
story− sounds preposterous. Turn ‘reality that is stranger thanfiction’ into a
question that becomes a lead for investigative journalists:

a. Did the judge put his kids on food stampsalthough he earns a judges’ salary?!

Did he have his niece hired by thewinning party to have her pay his gambling
debts?

b. Does he tell his law clerks that if at theend of their clerkship when they
search for a job they want him to write them aglowing letter of recommendation,
which can earn them a substantial sign-upbonus from the hiring employer, they
have to decide the cases assigned to himand write the decisions, which explains
why the style of the decisions signedby him is so oddly different every year
after the start of the new clerkship?

c. Also leave out anything on which honest peoplecan reasonably hold different
opinions. It falls within the judges’ wide marginof discretion. Your opinion is
not entitled to more credibility than thejudges’, especially since you are not
a lawyer, but rather a biased party, asall parties are.

b. What to include

46. Focus on the judges’ violation ofcriminal law, which their fellow judges
will not want to appear defending, lestthey dirty their own image: e.g.,

a. denial of due process and equal protection ofthe law;
b. conflict of interests;
c. abuse of public office and confidentialinformation for self-enrichment;
d. bribery;
e. bankruptcyfraud, concealment of assets, tax evasion, and money laundering;
f. interception of people’s mail and emails to detect and suppress those
critical ofjudges;
g. disregard of rules of conduct; cronyism;
h. cover-up;
i. ethnic, racial, socio-economic, gender, orreligious bias;
j. physical or sexual abuse;
k. arbitrariness; and
l. what offends the commonsense of decency and propriety.

46. Provide pieces of information, e.g.,names and dates, that can be treated as
data: They can be scanned into adatabase to find the most convincing type of
evidence: patterns of abuse byjudges and their cronies, formed by their
recurrence in the stories separatelyprovided by different people.
47. Let your story sit for a day or two.Come back to it for another phase-two
session. You are writing your story totell it first to journalists; and if it
passes muster, they will bring it tothe national public.
48. Eventually, your story will be the basis for your claim for compensation.
What you say now binds you later on. Do what it takes to get yourstory right.
It must be accurate, verifiable, and significant.

G. Title, subtitle, and theme of the story

49. After writing your story, you willrecognize a theme running through it.
Turn it into the title that expresses thenature of your story and its main
takeaway.
50. In general, the theme of your story andthat of the other witnesses is
“judges’ unaccountability and consequentriskless abuse of power”.
51. In particular, emphasize, whether in the title andcertainly throughout the
story, the judges’ three most outrageous acts. “If themost cannot do it, the
lesser need not try.”
52. There follow sample titles that summarizetheir respective story in a
sentence:

How a judge failed to recusehimself from a case where he approved the
foreclosure on an apartment building,the eviction of all the tenants, and its
conversion into an office building bya development company in which he is a
shareholder

How a judge once more declaredanother wealthy senior citizen incompetent and
appointed as her guardian aperson to whom he regularly entrusts guardianships,
who squeezed every pennyfrom her, and then dumped her onto the state welfare
system as an indigent

How a bankruptcy judge allowed thesame bankruptcy trustee to hold yet another
unannounced auction where only oneand the same bidder showed up, bought the
debtor’s assets for pennies on thedollar, flipped them, and made a killing...

leaving me as the financial corpse

Bonfire of integrity at thepenthouse: Judges attending a judicial conference
boasted about how they cutcorners on the law, use parties’ information to
enrich themselves and theirpartners, and have clerks fudge documents; and were
overheard by the apparentlyinvisible waiters and waitresses serving them, who
reported them to their chiefcircuit judge; and although the chief deemed their
reports complaints, shedismissed them without the waiters and waitresses ever
being interviewed aspart of any investigation

H. Additional information in links embedded in text and asendnotes

53. It is assumed that you will email yourstory. Attachments to them are risky
because when opened they can release avirus into the recipient’s computer. As a
result, some email computers(servers) do not accept for delivery emails with
attachments. Do not send them.
54. Instead, turn a reference to aperson, event, place, document, etc., into
alinking blue keyword, which holds embedded in it a‘hidden’, not visible, link
to a supporting document: Click on the keyword>in the dropdown menu click on
the word Hyperlink >in the box type in thehyperlink >click enter. The keyword
should turn blue indicating that it has an embeddedlink.
55. Be reasonable: do not mar your storywith dozens of blue words. Use your
good judgment to identify the documents whose links shouldbe embedded. If
readers need more supporting documents, they can ask you forthem. Store the
linked documents either on your website, DropBox, Google Plus,Academia, or any
other cloud storage facility.
56. If need be, you may provide at the end of your story a “List of links
tosupporting documents”.

a.  Add a brief description of what the correspondingdocument deals with.

b. Include in the list the documents ofthe opposing party and the decisions of
the judges in your case.
c. Be fair. Letthem ‘talk' too. Do not give the impression that you are hiding
the other side of the story or that you are so self-centered and small-minded
that you think your story only has one side: yours.
d. Be helpful: spare journalists and other readers the need tosearch for those
documents, which should be at your fingertips because youreceived them and
should have read them.

I. Sign and date your story

57. If your address, telephone number, andemail address were not stated at the
top of your story, state that informationat the end of it. Show that you take
responsibility for your story.
58. Moreover, your contact informationwill facilitate getting in touch with you
to ask for any needed clarificationor additional information.
59. Provide the date when you submit yourstory. That information is useful, in
general, to order documentschronologically and, in particular, to establish
your story’s currency, i.e.,its ‘as of date’.

J. Advocates’ sessions for article-reading and reciprocal revision of their
stories;and checklist and chapters making

60. To make it easier for the members of yourorganization, friends, relatives,
and otherAdvocates of Honest Judiciaries  to read this article I suggest that
you gettogether with them via video conference. Regardless of whether they are
in yourneighborhood or anywhere else in our country, on that occasion one
person at atime can read aloud a section. Then anybody can comment briefly on
how it helpsto write an accurate, significant, and verifiable story.
Thereafter, anotherperson can read the next section and so on.
a. The emails of other Advocates to whom I send my articles can be found in the
To: and cc:boxes of my emails and OL2:1140¶28–.

61. Before submitting your story, share it with all of them

a. A week after the article-reading session, you can hold the reciprocal
revision session, where eachperson can read aloud his or her story in up to 500
words. Thereafter anybodycan comment critically on how it was written and its
most important contents:what the writer identified as the most outrageous abuse
by judges and theircronies.

b. All of you will realize that if the story iswell written, its most
outrageous abuse can be stated in up to 500 words, whichwill grip everybody’s
attention; and if it is poorly written, nobody will payattention to the next
500 words.

c. This will be an opportunity for everybody to usegroup feedback to revise
their story and rehearse telling it either at a Commission“public meeting” or
an unprecedented citizens hearing. You will only have 500words and five minutes
to tell your story and outrage the national public. Revisionsand rehearsals
make perfect!

62. A competition for the title of “Protagonistof the Worst Abuse by Judges
Ever” or the attitude “My story is more importan thatyours cuz it effects more
people” does not improve anystory. They are egocentric and wasteful of
everybody’s effort, goodwill, andtime.
63. Cooperate to identify and rephrase,eliminate, or correct what is
inaccurate, insignificant, or unverifiable;ambiguous; inconsistent;
contradictory; digressive; repetitive; pretentious;self-aggrandizing;
defamatory; a poor word choice; trite; in bad taste; foullanguage, which is
impermissible; misspelled; unidiomatic; wrong syntax (wordorder);
ungrammatical; etc.
a. To describe the conduct of a judge and then characterize it as abusive,
illegal, or unethical is a statement of fact.

b. By contrast, to call the judge "a rotten, filthy, bag of..." is
disrespectful and gratuitously offensive. It does not inform the audience of
anything useful to understand the story except of the caller's lack of
objectivity, restraint, and education enabling him/her to distinguish between
venting his/her personal anger and frustration and telling a story in a
realistic, vivid, enlightening way that outrages the audience at the judge
rather than at the teller. It is the kind of language that must be avoided or
edited out without exception. It plays right into the hands of those who
denigrate complainants as "disgruntled losers", uneducated pro ses, and verbal
bullies. We, Advocates of Honest Judiciaries, do not want to be lumped together
with them, blemished, and dismissed by association.

64. All of you can draw up a “Checklist and Evaluation Form forStories of Abuse
of Power by Judges”. It can be used when composing the proposedAnnualReport on
Judicial Unaccountability and Abuseof Power in America.
65. Reciprocal revisions will afford youthe opportunity to know each other. You
and others can form achapter of Advocates who promote in turn the formation of
anational apolitical single issue civic movement for judicial abuse of power
exposure,compensation of victims, and reform.

K. Blocs of email addresses where to send your story

66. When you are ready to send your story, copy thebloc of email addresses
below and paste it in the corresponding box of youremail:
To [for the commissioners of the Biden Commission]:

cristina.rodriguez@xxxxxxxx, robert.bauer@xxxxxxx, kandrias@xxxxxxxxx,
jack.balkin@xxxxxxxx, RBauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, baude@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
madams@xxxxxx, charles@xxxxxxxxxxxx, acrespo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
wdellinger@xxxxxxx,
ecb95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,justin.driver@xxxxxxxx,rfallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,heather.k.gerken@xxxxxxxx,
ngertner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgoldsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
tgriffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tgrove@xxxxxxxxxx, bhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
mkang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ojohns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lacroix@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
lemos@xxxxxxxxxxxx, levi@xxxxxxxxxxxx, trevor.morrison@xxxxxxx,
cnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rick.pildes@xxxxxxx, mramsey@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
krooseve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, d-strauss@xxxxxxxxxxxx, bross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
tribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, awhite36@xxxxxxx, kewhitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
development@xxxxxxxxxxxx, michael.waldman@xxxxxxx,
caroline.fredrickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,

cc [for journalists]:

“Veterans Today Senior Editor Gordon Duff”<gpduf@xxxxxxx>, “Veterans Today
Managing Editor Jim W Dean”<jimwdean@xxxxxxx>, ajaffe@xxxxxxxxxxx,
john.shiffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, michael.berens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
blake.morrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, “Todd Wallack”<twallack@xxxxxxxxx>,“Brian
McGrory Editor” <brian.mcgrory@xxxxxxxxx>, contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
charles.ornstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tracy.weber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
spotlight@xxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
patricia.wen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,marketresearch.thomsonreuters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
ijerr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,newstip@xxxxxxxxx, newsletters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
emily.holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, NTotenberg@xxxxxxx, ryan.grim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
andrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Laura.Crimaldi@xxxxxxxxx, inytletters@xxxxxxxxxxx,
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Evan.Allen@xxxxxxxxx, info@xxxxxx,
Elizabeth_Warren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,ginger.thompson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
mcnulaj@xxxxxxxxxxx,MCoyle@xxxxxxx,
communication@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,aglantz@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,mderienzo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,joepatrice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxx,aturturro@xxxxxxx,
Opencourt@xxxxxxx,letters@xxxxxxxxxxx, contact_us@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Matt.Rocheleau@xxxxxxxxx, oped@xxxxxxxxxxx, jmaxeiner@xxxxxxxxx,
Jackie.Botts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hello@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Jaimi.Dowdell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Vernal.Coleman@xxxxxxxxx, Brendan.McCarthy@xxxxxxxxx,
Andrew.Chung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lawrence.Hurley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Andrea.Januta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,

67. Post the article to social media, such as:

Facebook,  Youtube,   LinkedIn,   Instagram,  Google Plus,   Pinterest,
Reddit,  Snapchat,   WhatsApp

Twitter: Request that the Biden Commission on Supreme Court reform hold
publicmeetings & journalists and universities hold citizens hearings where
peoplecan tell their story of judges’ abuse of power;
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_method_for_writing_your_story.pdf

68. Precede your story with this professionalletterhead and introduction (which
have 483 words and should give you an ideaof the length of your story):
Your name and address, phone number; email address

The Biden Commission on Supreme Courtreform;

Investigative journalists; andAdvocates of Honest Judiciaries

Dear Commissioners, Journalists, andAdvocates,

      Kindly find below my story of the abuse of power by judges that I
havesuffered and/or witnessed.

      I am sending it to support my request that youhear me and similarly
situated abusees at the “public meetings” that theCommission is mandated to
hold. You should allow your “meetings” and your report to inform thenational
public of how justices and judges behave in practice, abusing theirpower for
their gain and convenience because they are unaccountable and theirabuse is
riskless.

By contrast, if you limit yourself to a merediscussion of the theory of
constitutional law on the Supreme Court, you willhave allowed yourselves to be
manipulated as a pretext for implementing theforegone political decision to
“pack the Court”.
I also request that you journalists joinforces with journalism, Information
Technology, and business academics toexpose judicial abuse of power at the
unprecedentedcitizens hearings proposed by Dr. RichardCordero, Esq.
At those hearings, multidisciplinary panelsof journalists and academics can
take the testimony of abusees. They can do so lifeat media stations and
university auditoriums across the country as well as via videoconference to
make it inexpensive and convenient for them and the public toattend. This can
launch a MeToo!-liketrend of public accountability here and abroad.
It is overdue: In the 232 years since thecreation of the Federal Judiciary in
1789, the number of federal judgesimpeached and removed is only 8! For
comparison, the number of federal officers on the bench on September30, 2020,
was 2,341. Federal judges need not fear losing their jobs. In practice,
theyhave turned public power entrusted to them into the power of a State above
thestate.
The “meetings” and the citizens hearings canexpose the nature, extent, and
gravity of judges’ abuse. On that factual basis,the reform can be undertaken of
not only the Supreme Court, where in theOctober 2019-September 2020 fiscal year
only “73 cases were argued and 69were disposed of in 53signed opinions”, but
also the lower federal courts, whichterminated 1,103,337(page10) in the year to
September30, 2020.
The citizens hearings can be expanded to takethe testimony of victims of state
judges, who are just as outrageous in theirabuse of power.
The hearings can thus lead to a reform thattakes from judges the
unaccountability that they have arrogated to themselvesand gives back to We the
People, theMasters of all public servants, what is our birthright: government
by the ruleof law where the People exercisetheir right to hold also their
judicial public servants accountable forentrusted power and liable to
compensate the victims of their abuse.
Therefore, I request the opportunity to beheard also at the citizens hearings.

Date:                                   Name:

L. My presentationto you and your group of guests

69. I offer to make a presentation on thisarticle to you and your group of
guests followed by a Q&A session. It cantake place via video conference and, if
in New York City, in person.

70. To form an idea of the quality of presentation that you can expect of me,
watch my video and follow it on its slides.
71. To schedule it and agree on its terms,use my contact information below.

M. Every meaningful cause needs resources for itsadvancement;
     none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money
72. Lip service advances nothing; but it continues to enable the abusers.
73. You can help continue and advanceour common cause through.
Judicial Discipline Reform

whose articles,posted to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
have attracted somany webvisitors and
elicited in them such a positive reaction that
39,103 have become subscribers as ofJuly 15, 2021(Appendix3).

74. How many websites of law firms, let alone lawyers, do youknow that have so
many subscribers?
75. These articles are the product of professional law researchand writing, and
strategic thinking.
76. They describe the out-of-court strategy for:
informing the national public about, and outraging it at,
judges' abuse of power and
forming a national apolitical single issue civic movement for
judicial abuse exposure,
compensation of abusees, and
reform through transformative change.
77. You too can subscribe to the articles by going to

http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel↓Register
or
+ New   or   Users   >Add New.   DONATE

by making a deposit in, or an online transfer to,
Citi Bank account 4977 59 2001, routing number 021 000 089,
through Zelle

through Paypal
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HBFP5252TB5YJby

or
by mailing a check to the address below.
Dare trigger history!...and you mayenter it. Sincerely, Dr. Richard Cordero,
Esq.
JudicialDiscipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
    tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b NOTE: Given ;
theinterference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described
at*>ggl:1 et seq. and †>OL2:1114§G, when emailing him, copy the above bloc of
his email addressesand paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance
the chances of youremail reaching him at least at one of those
addresses.************************

[administrating-your-public-servants] How you can write and revise your story of judicial unaccountability & guardianship abuse for the Biden Commission on the Supreme Court and the unprecedented citizens hearings

Other related posts: