Respectable people trying to serve justice, and/or whatever, whoever deserves
as much, them (if not you) probably being The more, understanding, in such
respect.. .
Don, it isn't mostly if not mainly the rich who are subverting reason, (and
being abusive) or do you disagree with that statement? Prove it, better? What
about those actually pulling triggers, do you think most of them are wealthy,
and not especially responsible for injustice? Seriously. If people fall for
lies, (as Hitler's subjects?) like most do, do you only blame the liar? What's
your problem? Like, who ain't lying. I'm serious, if not one of few in such
respect
Robert, if you're not a socialist of the wrong kind, re., any socialist not
primarily for the Individual of justice, (and serving it, if not merely, So)
would you accept a loan? Why not, ask for credit? Reasonable people want a
return (clearly identifiable if not acknowledged) on their investment, even if
only the cost of inflation, (not to be a loser by as much) if not how else we
will benefit from the loan. Actualize your model or method to give people a
return on, our investment, other than asking for charity, if not for the
charity "you" give, (or it ain't, a gift, like mine) 'cause, as I see it, we
here are all giving charity, (of a sort) and not seeming better off than you if
not by as much. Really, as from the evidence, or or not interested in providing
the evidence? Then what? .. . Indeed, I am that openly honest, my figuring
there is no other kind of honesty, justice, or goodness.
Don't ask me to facilitate the organization paradigm that will prove your
merit, otherwise. You said it, it takes money/resources to make things happen,
the resources of what we speak surely manifesting in the resources that you
speak of, and for, yes, or no? Do The Math?.
Credit is the action of the reasonable, and just, for what they deserve (what
being needed, as what is deserved, being "fundamental" to what is just and
serving justice) where charity, or gifts of consideration not expecting
anything in return (for what that generates, if not degenerates) more of the
unproven or not validated, if not of the problem.. .
At least consider "borrowing" what you're looking for in such respect,
everyone, that isn't getting what they feel they need and can produce in such
regard. Consider all your options in such respect. You're going to need other
types of individuals to get as much off the ground, whatever else might be
legitimate, if not merely by calculations as a philosopher, if you will .. .
Like I can't take on, if not help do anything in such respect, but figure I can
I figure I do exceptionally well by as much, yes, modesty, if not such modesty
also being of such thing.
Hey, if you don't deserve "credit" for what you're doing, you probably don't
deserve anything of value in such respect, my not saying you should get
wealthier than you deserve to be, but as wealthy as you should be in such
respect
Give, and get "credit" where it is deserved if not due, or else
If you're too apathetic (or whatever. Politically compromised?) to consider
doing as much, (going with a credit rewarding organizational structure) don't
expect to amount to much, in my book, etc..
I give money, etc., where I get a return on my generosity and talents (etc.) in
such respect, not thinking that makes me a genius, no
Your project (mega project?) might not be doable in such respect. It still nice
to hear from you from what we get and do for each other in such respect,
whoever might be interested in taking things even further, where necessary as
deserved.
Don't limit yourself, otherwise
Champion of as much.
On Wednesday, May 11, 2022, 02:18:18 p.m. EDT, Don Mashak
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you were to create a 700x700pixel meme summarizing this information and
including a short link to webpageswith this information, I would be happy to
repost it to multiple social media platforms.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
Rt 1 Box 231
Albertville MN 55301
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended only
for the use of the person or entity named above and is privileged and
confidential. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
other than to the person or entity named above is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender
by phone and by replying to this message and then delete the message and any
attachments from your system.
On Wednesday, May 11, 2022, 07:35:04 AM CDT, dr.richard.cordero_esq
<dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of thisemail.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media aswidely as possible
in your own interest and that of the rest of We thePeople; e.g., click “Reply
All” and “Send”.
To subscribeto articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel ↓Register or + New
or Users >Add New; or fill out the New User form
athttps://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php. ;
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it showsirregularities
when received, e.g., joinedwords, they crept in during transit and are beyond
mycontrol. Kindly overlook them. A pdf version of this article -as such likely
tobe free of irregularities- is found here and downloadable through thenext
link. Proposalto Reuters, WSJ, WP, and all other media outlets
for a joint venture at the most propitious time:
when the Supreme Court’s leaked abortion draft decision
has set the mood for national outrage to explode as a result of
the exposure of justices’ and judges’ participation in
abuse of power and financial criminality
so coordinated and widespread as to amount to
their running the Federal Judiciary as a racketeering enterprise:
“Scandal sells” and can win Pulitzer Prizes by leadingto
the serial resignation of justices, judges, and courts;
the loss of public trust in the Federal Judiciary that brings it down;
the calling of the constitutional convention already petitioned by 34 states;
and a new constitution by today’s We the People
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_from_abortion_decision_to_new_constitution.pdf
By
Dr. Richard Cordero,Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx A. The foundation for exposing judges’ andjustices’
abuse of power and financial criminality 1. The leaked draft opinion by Supreme
Court JusticeSamuel A. Alito revealing that a majority of the Court is in favor
ofoverturning Roe v. Wade has caused national jubilation but even more outrage.
2. That outrage would pale by comparison to thatwhich can be provoked and
overcome much jubilation by a series of responsibleand principled articles,
such as those already written and available forreview(Appendix 6§A) or that can
be writtenon commission(Appendix 6§B), exposing how thejustices, who are
unaccountable and not even held to any ethics code, run andcondone the running
of the Federal Judiciary as a racketeering enterprise. 3. There is solid
basisfor raising these charges against justices and judges. To begin with,
there isthe series of articles that TheWall Street Journal (WSJ) began to
publish on September 28, 2021,under the initial title “131Federal Judges Broke
the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a FinancialInterest”. a.
Anotherarticle in the series was published on November 2, 2021, titled
“HiddenInterests – Federal Judge Files Recusal Notices in 138 Cases After WSJ
Queries.[U.S. Chief District Judge of the Eastern District of Texas] Rodney
Gilstrapinitially argued he didn’t violate financial-conflicts law”;
James.Grimaldi@xxxxxxx, Joe.Palazzolo@xxxxxxx, Coulter.Jones@xxxxxxx,
Michael.Siconolfi@xxxxxxx.
b. The judges who failed to recusethemselves in order to grab money necessarily
engaged, lest they incriminatethemselves, in inside trading, fraud, concealment
of assets, tax evasion, andmoney laundering. Those are crimes. They are complex
and require coordination.When judges committed them as principals or condoned
them as accessories, they becamethe judicial class that turned the Federal
Judiciary into a ‘racketeerinfluenced and corrupt organization’(Cf. Title 18 of
the U.S. Code of federallaw, section 1961 (18 U.S.C. §1961)). c. When a chief
judge engages in suchsystematic abuse of power and financial criminality, how
strongly do his fellowjudges feel justified and encouraged by his example in
committing any and allsorts of abuse and crimes so that abuse and criminality
become their judiciary’s institutionalizedway of doing business? d. Today
journalists must adapt and askthe famous question that Sen. Howard Baker, the
ranking minority member of theSenate Watergate Committee, asked of every
witness at the Watergate hearings: 1) What did Supreme Court Chief JusticeJohn
G. Roberts, Jr., know about it and when did he know it? 2) What did Justice
Samuel A. Alito,the circuit justice assigned under 28 U.S.C. §42, to, and with
supervisory duties over, theFifth Circuit, which includes Texas, know about it,
and when did he know it? 3) What did Justice Clarence Thomasknow about his
wife’s effort to overturn the 2020 election results; and whendid he know it?
Let him “deal with it” and with his failure toreport in his annual financial
disclosure reports her earnings(jur:72§b) 4) What did Then-Judge, Now-Judge
SoniaSotomayor know about the embarrassing DeLano case and its suppressionfrom
the Senate Committee on Judicial Nominations; and when did she know
it(jur:65§§1-3) 5) What did President Joe Biden knowthrough the FBI secret
vetting reports about the participation in judges’ abuseand criminality, or
their cover-up, by former Chief Judge Merrick Garland ofthe Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit, now his AttorneyGeneral, and Judge
Ketanji Brown Jackson, who sits in that Circuit; and whendid he know it? 4.
Thomson Reuters, on the strength of it 2,500+journalists and 600+
photojournalists, can scoop the story of the justices’abuse and criminality. It
already dare publish on June 30, 2020, the first ofits three-part report
“TheTeflon Robe” on its massive investigationof state judges led by
John.Shiffman@thomsonreuters.comand Michael.Berens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx found
that “hardwired judicial corruption” intertwines state judges and thestate
commissions on judicial performance that are duty-bound to supervise
anddiscipline them. a. Reuters asked readers to send it their storiesof abuse
by judges…and it was “inundated” with them. This goes to showing thatpeople who
have suffered or witnessed judges’ abuse want to tell their story tothe largest
public possible. 5. The mood for exposing the justices’unaccountability and
their consequent riskless abuse of power and financialcriminality is manifest
in Congress. This is shown by The Hill, in its article “House panel to
exploreimpeachment [of Justice Clarence Thomas], judicial ethics in wake of
GinniThomas texts” by Emily Brooks, published on April 2, 2022. It reported
that: a. “Representative Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), the chairmanof the House
Judiciary courts subcommittee, …last year introduced the SupremeCourt Ethics
Act to implement a judicial code of conduct that applies to theSupreme Court.
Jones co-led the Twenty-First Century Courts Act, which would
similarlyimplement a code of conduct for the justices. b. “He said, “Recent
reports that thetext messages of a justice’s spouse urging the overturning of a
free and fairelection may have been at issue in a case in front [sic] the
Supreme Court —but that the justice did not recuse himself from the case — is
just the latestand particularly egregious example in an unfortunately long list
ofillustrations as to why Supreme Court justices need to follow a formal code
ofethics,” Johnson told The Hill. “I have been calling for this sort ofreform
for years, and I am encouraged to see a large, bipartisan majority ofthe public
in favor of this long overdue legislation…Johnson called forThomas’s
resignation.” 6. Strickland v. U.S.,no. 21-1346, is a civil case where a
decision was handed down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit on
April 26,2022. It is unprecedented, for it holds that the Federal Judiciary and
itsofficials are suable on grounds of the 5th and 14thAmendments due process
and equal protection of the law clauses, as well asspecific acts of Congress.
Hence, it reversed the outright dismissal by thetrial court, which had invoked
judicial immunity –a doctrine self-servingly conjured upby judges themselves in
defiance of the Constitution– and remanded for furtherproceedings. a.
Strickland opens the door for allabusees joining forces to collectively demand
compensation from the FederalJudiciary and the justices themselves. Imagine the
amount of business generatedif Thomson Reuters, I, and other media outlets
showed the abusees how to demand such compensation. B. What I bring to the
joint venture 7. I established JudicialDiscipline Reform. Its website is at
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. There I post articles with ;
lawresearch findings and legal strategy to which the national public has
access.Those articles have attracted so many webvisitors and appealed to them
sopositively that as of May 10, 2022, the number of them who had
becomesubscribers was 43,987+.(Appendix 3) a. Do you know of any law firm,
let alone alawyer, that has so many subscribers to their website? 8. The
subscribers to my site have foundmy articles appealing although the articles
are intellectually demanding andwritten in long form. It is reasonable to
assume that the subscribers are mostlythe type of highly educated and well-off
readers of such top publications as The New York Times and its Sunday
Edition,The Washington Post, The New Yorker, TIME Magazine, The Atlantic, The
Boston Globe, etc. 9. These subscribers can afford the booksand services of
Thomson Reuters and other publishers, just as their lawyerscan. 10. The
general public too, including pro ses,is attracted to the website and can
patronize its sponsor’s advertisement therethanks to the concrete, reasonable,
and feasible ways in which I have proposed thatpeople take action in their own
interest; e.g.: a. the two-phase methodfor writing their own story; b. how to
use legal sourcesfor brief writing(see a list of them at Appendix 6§C); c. the
folly of pro sesimprovising themselves as lawyers; d. how to seek free legal
assistance. 11. Judicial Discipline Reform, its articles, and its website rely
on a three-volume study* † ♣ of judges and theirjudiciaries, the product of
professional law research and writing, andstrategic thinking. It is titled
downloadable as follows: Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news andpublishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting* † ♣ i.Open the downloaded files using
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available for free. ♣ Volume 3:
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf ;
from OL3:1144-1480+