Dear Richard,
You admirably point out why the legal system (if not supporting political
system) is implicated in injustice and abuse.
Case in point. All evidence is pretty much circumstantial (but where a judge or
jury directly witnesses an abuse or offence, if not merely of the law) so, why
aren't more crimes resolved and justice served, (at the state's expense,
whatever else a state should be good for) the right to lie (not incriminating
oneself to more than that when doing so...) being a fundamental right to
"freedom of speech," (Second Amendment, or whatever) whatever the court might
say or hold, otherwise, (in contravention) also keeping in mind that mitigating
circumstances never points to responsibility and corresponding justice, "by
Definition," (of Understanding) everything being relative, nevertheless,
"responsibility" must be attributed where credit is, especially/as well.. .
Champion of Justice, beyond the laws if not beyond the laws of abuse, etc., So
Really
It really bothers me (So bothers me) how justice is not served relative to war,
encompassing war crimes, politics, etc.. I aim for justice to prevail in such
respect
Thanks for trying to serve justice legally, in trying to cover that base, that
we might claim we tried to cooperate (communicate) and do our best within the
framework of the law, how we are especially serving justice in such regard, not
confusing the one with the other (the crimes of the law being somewhat myriad
and legion, if not definitive to the failing, or culpability of politics if not
politics, and whatever, otherwise
So Satisfied, to Serve, as I Do,
Michael Glavic On Saturday, September 24, 2022 at 12:54:17 a.m. EDT, Dr.
Richard Cordero, Esq. <corderoric@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NOTES: I would be gratefulif you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media
aswidely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We thePeople;
e.g., click “Reply All” and “Send”. To subscribeto articles
similar to the one hereunder go to http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;
<left panel ↓Register or + New or Users >Add New; or fill out the New
User form athttps://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php .
The article belowhad a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities when received,such as joinedwords or fonts of different sizes,
they crept in during transitand are beyond my control. Kindly overlook them. A
pdf version of this article-as such likely to be free of irregularities- is
found hereand downloadable through the next link.
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , ;
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , Corderoric@xxxxxxxxx
Proceedingstrategically to
choose what to read; turn other abusees into informants; and
inform and outrage the most resourceful and the strongest: themedia and the
national public
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_think_proceed_strategically_to_expose_abuse.pdf
DearMs. McKinney, Mr. Tsitrin, Mr. Scott, Ms. Kiliany, Mr. Vallejo, and
Advocatesof Honest Judiciaries, A. Choosing what to read based on the
publisher’scommercial and reputational risk and potential gains
1. Thank you, Ms. McKinney, for the article thatyou sent me on judges that
subject clerks to outbursts of insults and threatsof termination. It was
published by The Washington Post. Similar reputablemedia outlets lose
substantial advertisement dollars and public esteem whenthey publish unverified
and exaggerated news. Hence, they adhere to professionalstandards of
responsible journalism. That is why I read the articles that yousend me and
appreciate your sending them. 2. By contrast, when the publishers are Joe
Schmockand Jane Widget, who are mostly people with no training in journalism,
and havenothing and, thus, nothing to lose, their articles are to be treated
with greatcaution. Frequently, they resort to hyperbole and sensationalism to
attract theattention of uncritical and uneducated readers. Investing effort and
time readingthem is not warranted. 3. Other people send me materials and
requests thatconcern only their local, personal cases. However, your articles
can be usedfor the benefit of the national public. Indeed, they already caught
theattention of reputable journalists and media outlets. We need to join
forceswith them as they have what we lack but desperately need: the means
ofdistributing articles nationwide. They will only use those means to
advancetheir own commercial and professional interests, not ours. So, when we
approachthem, we must persuade them by arguing what they, not we, can lose or
gain.
B. Judges protect each other, not their employees
4. Tenth Circuit Chief Judge Timothy Tymkovich daretake action against Ms.
Garza because she was not a member of the class of realjudges with a
life-appointment, bound by a complicit mutual assistanceagreement. She was only
an employee under contract to work as a magistrate foran eight-year term. It
was easy for him and his peers not to reappoint her dueto her misconduct. 5.
But C.J. Tymkovich did not dare take actionagainst Then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh,
though he was the subject of 83 complaints.Instead, he dismissed all of them.
They included mine, no. 18-90089, againstnot only Judge Kavanaugh, but also
against Then-Chief Judge Merrick Garland ofthe Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia District (now AttorneyGeneral).(OL2:748) My complaint was
for abusivelyholding themselves unaccountable by dismissing 100% of complaints
filed againstthem and their peers and colleagues in their court and the rest of
theircircuit. 6. Since C.J. Garland had to recuse himself fromhandling my
complaint, it was referred to Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.,who in turn
referred it to Judge Tymkovich.(OL2:792)Their handling of my complaint and
those of the other complainants was anexercise in public deception because it
was a foregone conclusion that thecomplaints would be dismissed to protect
fellow judges.(Id.) 7. Magistrate Garza was investigated and thefindings of
facts were revealed to the public. That must have infuriated her.This provides
an opportunity to apply the strategic thinking principle, “Theenemy of my enemy
is my friend”. It serves out strategy to find her contactinformation: 8.
Magistrate Garza now has a motive to invokeequal protection of the law
arguments to expose any abuse of power by judges ofwhich she or other people
were victims; and any abuse that judges committed fortheir gain and
convenience: e.g.,
a. information received under seal or inchambers on which they bought or sold
shares or real estate;
b. their failure toreport their participation in seminars and conferences,
known as judicialjunkets, to which third parties, who litigate in their courts,
invited them andpaid their expenses;
c. banks that bribed them by writing off their credit card debts.
9. In the same vein, the clerks victimized bynot only other magistrates, but
also by judges, must now feel encouraged tofile their complaints. To that end,
they can apply the employee disputeresolution rules of their court, circuit, or
the Federal Judiciary.Additionally, they can publish their complaints as an
exercise of their 1stAmendment right to “freedomof speech, of the press, the
right of the people peaceably to assemble [byemail and on social media too],
and to petition the Government [of which judgesare the third branch] for a
redress of grievances [including their payment ofcompensation]”.
a. Even if clerks are afraid of the risk involved in publishing
theircomplaints, they can be encouraged to share their contents with us
asconfidential informants.(OL2:468)
10. Here is where you all come in. You can methodicallysearch for the email
addresses and telephone numbers of Magistrate Garza, herpeers, clerks, and
their associations to share with them my articles. We needtheir interest in
being vindicated and compensated to cause them to participatein turning the
issue of judicial abuse of power into a key issue of the midtermelections and
of the national political debate thereafter. Please, share withme the contact
information that you find.
C. Even if you are not a lawyer, you must be fair,realistic, and think
strategically
11. If you are not a lawyer, you will be hard put to write aknowledgeable and
coherent brief based on the legal points in my article on moving for the
recusal of one judge or all the judges of a court. 12. You may feel that the
judges in your case abused theirpower by denying you due process and equal
protection of the law or otherconstitutional and statutory rights. But that
does not mean that, in light ofthe facts and the law of your case, they
actually did so. A judge that deniesyou a right that given your limited
knowledge of the law you imagine that youhave but that you do not is not
abusing you: He or she is only applying thelaw. Your opposing party is entitled
to be treated "according to law". Thejudge is not there to protect you,
regardless of the other party’s rights. 13. Even if you were abused, that does
not qualify you towrite a competent brief that follows the rules of procedure,
e.g., FederalRules of Civil and Appellate Procedure and the Rules of Evidence
in the Appendixof 28 U.S.C. These rules have been adopted practically word
forword by the states. 14. Do not waste your effort, time, and sanity in a
hopelesseffort to improvise yourself as a lawyer. 15. Instead, either retain
an attorney and pay his/her feesor do the following: Dress up to look
professional and be taken seriously-appearance counts, for it gives the first
impression of you-; go to your locallaw school and to the office of the dean of
students; and ask the dean to putyou in touch with an appropriate clinic: the
students taking a course whereunder the supervision of a professor clients with
real cases are served. Youmay be asked to pay a modest fee, but the advice and
assistance that you willreceive will be invaluable: Those students need to
prove to themselves andtheir peers how good they are. Also, they are working
for academic credit andmust prove to the supervising professor that they
deserve the highest gradepossible. They work for themselves and you. 16. You
may go to your local bar association and ask to beput in touch with a pro bono
attorney, to wit, a lawyer who will at least hearyou out, review some
documents, and give you free advice. 17. Doing that shows strategic thinking.
You can alsoproceed strategically by distributing my articles: Simply open one
email at atime and click “Reply All”and “Send”. Althoughseveral emails may bear
the same subject in the Re: box, each has a differentset of email addresses in
its respective To:box. Doing that takes less than eight seconds per email.
a. Yet, that is how youcan advance your own local, personal case as well as
your own interest in informingthe national public about judges’ abuse of power,
for only an outraged publicis strong enough to force politicians to hold judges
accountable for theirperformance and liable to compensate the victims of their
abuse.
D. Everymeaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, withoutmoney
18. Putyour money where your outrage at abuse and quest for justice are.
19. Support the professional law research and writing, andstrategic thinking at
JudicialDiscipline Reform
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org DONATE ;
by makinga deposit or an online transfer through either the Bill Pay feature
ofyour online account or Zelle from your account
to TD Bank account # 43 92 62 52 45, routing# 260 13 673;
or Citi Bank account # 4977 59 2001, routing# 021 000 089.
20. I lookforward to hearing from you, your lawyers, and Advocates.
Dare trigger history!, and you may enter it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero,Esq.
JudicialDiscipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b NOTE: Given the ;
interference with Dr. Cordero’s email ande-cloud storage accounts described at
*>ggl:1 et seq. and † >OL2:1114§G,when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his
email addresses and paste it inthe To: line of your email so as to enhance the
chances of your email reachinghim at least at one of those addresses.
***********************
| | Virus-free.www.avast.com |
