I’ll be the first to respond to the last sentence. There’s no issue to claim
the CqV. We are party to 1/2 if it as a signatory.
On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:45 PM, Winningham Fearn <winfearn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am constrained to speak up here because all of this is using words that are
commercial in nature.
Trusts and estates fall under the Convention Concerning the International
Administration of Estates of Deceased Persons which was concluded on 2
October 1972 and the Convention on the Law Applicable to Trusts and their
Recognition which was concluded 1 July 1985, during the Hague Conference on
Private International Law
By using these words and doing these things you are going into Private
International Law which is Roman Law which is intentionally meant to be
deceptive. It is satanic!
I do NOT do any of that. It is a fraud and if you participate in the fraud
you cannot claim fraud.
This is NOT and has NEVER been anything I recommend and I really do NOT like
it being talked about on my groups.
The ONLY trusts that I participate in are common law trusts that I set up for
Asset Protection.
If you do any of that trying to capture their Roman Cult cestui trust, you
are literally in a contract with the devil and I believe you will come to
regret it.
Be warned!!!!
Best Regards,
Win
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 8:49 PM Sara Mills <saramills2015@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have been watching these videos as well as 13 others on this channel about
the Secured Party Creditor process.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIzxJQGQmG8&t=8232s
On 7/23/2021 4:24 PM, 'noble savage' via Administrating Your Public Servants
wrote:
The fellow on this link is a smart guy!
However, I'd like to offer the following:
1. Instead of calling the ENTITY NAME a "clone image", refer to it as a
"reflection"...
2. Winston Shrout is in jail because he used the SoS "online direct" system
to file his UCC forms (which
does convert the creditor name to ALL CAPS automatically) - ALWAYS MAIL
THEM IN! (Ol' Noble is
gonna do ya'll another solid - SEE ATTACHMENT, bearing in mind that
it's specifically crafted &
worded to work in California)...
3. The living man/woman is, in fact, the creditor - The ENTITY NAME is the
"separate banking
institution"...
4. I prefer to "confer the duty of surety" rather than "assign a trustee"...
Basically, this fellow & I have different methods of "skinning a cat" -
He starts at the top of the head, while I start at the @$$h(*)le...
On Thursday, July 22, 2021, 11:46:42 AM PDT, Mike
<leatherlips1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Administrating Your Public Servants" group.
To post to this group, send email to
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
administrating-your-public-servants+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/administrating-your-public-servants?hl=en?hl=en
This is a private communication between living souls who are not fictitious
entities in any way. All communications in this group are strictly
confidential. If you have received this message and you are not a member of
the group, then you agree to keep it confidential, or delete the message and
let the owner of the group know. Your retention of this private
communication is your tacit agreement to these terms and conditions.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Administrating Your Public Servants" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to administrating-your-public-servants+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/administrating-your-public-servants/36ae1f4d-7eac-3cb0-5e4b-0ca4bc74bd00%40gmail.com.
