[accesscomp] Fw: Android vs. Siri, Dan's tip for September 4th 2013

  • From: "Bob Acosta" <boacosta@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "tektalk discussion" <tektalkdiscussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "access comp" <accesscomp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 09:14:24 -0700

        
----- Original Message ----- 
From: dan Thompson 
To: dan Thompson 
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 6:01 AM
Subject: Android vs. Siri, Dan's tip for September 4th 2013


Good morning to All!!

Here is an awesome article noted in last week's edition of Top Tech Tidbits

By Dean 

Martineau, at dean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

http://www.flying-blind.com 

 

The Voice-Off: Android vs. Siri

By David Pogue

90 Seconds With Pogue: Speech Smackdown: The Times's David Pogue pits Google's 
Android and Apple's iOS against each other to see which voice recognition 
system is better.

By DAVID POGUE

Published: August 21, 2013 

 Email: pogue@xxxxxxxxxxx

 

"Android's voice commands are still no match for Siri." 

Man, I really was stupid. Who'd be dumb enough to take sides in a religious 
war? I'd have been better off writing, "Conservatives are better-looking than 
liberals" or "Pro-life people are worse drivers than pro-choice." 

But the superiority of cellphone speech-recognition technology is not an idle 
question. Once touch screens became the future of phones, voice recognition 
became desperately important. Without physical keys or buttons, entering text 
and manipulating software controls are fussy, multistep procedures. 

So I've just spent two weeks immersed in voice recognition. I carried an iPhone 
and a phone running Google's Android operating system with me everywhere. I 
spoke to both phones simultaneously. I wanted to get to know the differences, 
the strengths, the weaknesses. 

When people talk about speech recognition, they mean, and often confuse, three 
different functions. There's dictation, where the phone converts speech to 
text; commands, where you operate the phone by talking; and Internet 
information searches. There are vast differences among the successes of the 
three. 

Dictation, for example, is still fairly poor on both systems. Both Android 
phones and Siri, the iPhone's speech feature, make many transcription errors. 
When you hear people bashing cellphone transcription, declaring, "I gave up on 
it," they're usually referring to dictation. 

That's forgivable, but come on. You're asking your phone to understand varying 
accents at varying distances from its microphone, in rooms with varying 
background noise. It's a wonder this feature works at all. 

The latest Android version doesn't require an Internet connection to do basic 
dictation. And in Android, the words appear on the screen as you utter them; 
Siri doesn't transcribe until you stop talking. 

On the other hand, Siri understands formatting controls like "capital," "all 
caps" and "no space," as well as all kinds of punctuation - "colon," "dash," 
"asterisk," "ellipsis" and so on. Android understands only the basic symbols, 
like "period," "comma" and "exclamation point." 

The second category, phone-control commands, is far more successful for far 
more people. This is when you say: "Call Mom," "Text Emily," "Wake me at 7:30," 
"Play some Billy Joel," "Remind me to feed the cat when I get home," and so on. 

Controlling your phone without touching it is important for safety, of course. 
If you must interact with your phone while driving, speaking to it certainly 
seems safer than looking at it. 

But don't forget the convenience factor. It's much faster to say, "Open Angry 
Birds" than to flip through home screens full of icons. And "Set my alarm for 8 
a.m." is about 375 finger-taps quicker than using the clock app. 

Here, Siri has the edge. As you're driving along, for example, and you hear the 
incoming message sound, you can say, "Read my new messages," and Siri reads 
them aloud. It even invites you to dictate a reply, without ever taking your 
eyes off the road. Android can't do that. 

Both systems can tap into some of the phone's own apps. They recognize commands 
like "Make a meeting with Bob Barnett Thursday at noon" (a calendar 
interaction), "Make a note to pay back Harold" (notes), "Send an e-mail to 
Danny Cooper" (mail) and "What's Steve Alper's home address?" (contacts). 

Android blows away iOS, though, in Web searches. Both kinds of phones do an 
amazing job fetching weather updates ("What will the weather in Detroit be this 
weekend?"), times ("What time is it in Belgium?"), stock prices, sports 
information ("When's the next Cowboys game?"), conversions ("How many dollars 
in 32 euros?"), calculations ("How many days until Valentine's Day?") and every 
kind of Web-search query ("How many calories are in a Hershey bar?", "When is 
the next solar eclipse?", "How do you spell schadenfreude?", "Show me pictures 
of a 1985 Corvette," and so on). 

Some Siri humor. 

Android is especially amazing at dialing places without having to look them up 
("Call the Macy's on 34th Street") and directions ("Get me to La Guardia 
Airport by public transportation"), since its Map app is so unbelievably good. 
It's also smarter about connecting questions. If your first question was, "Who 
is Hillary Clinton?", you can follow up with, "Who is her husband?" 

And Google has a built-in music-recognition feature, like the Shazam app. Tap 
the voice-recognition icon, let the phone listen to whatever song is playing, 
and marvel as it instantly identifies the song and singer. 

Unfortunately, Android has an Achilles' heel - actually, more like Achilles' 
entire leg. To issue spoken commands, you have to tap the microphone icon on 
the Google search bar. And it's only on the home screen or the Google Now 
screen (swipe up from the bottom). So you can't speak commands when your phone 
is locked, or when you're in another app. 

On the iPhone, you hold down the Home button or the clicker on your earbuds 
cord, so the voice command feature works when the phone is asleep or in any 
app. 

In other words, to use an Android phone's speech features, you frequently have 
to pick it up, and you always have to look at it, which defeats much of the 
purpose. The exception: Motorola's new phones, like the Moto X, can be set to 
listen all the time. 

Siri is better with restaurants and movies, too. Both phones understand, "Good 
Indian restaurants around here" or "Call the Olive Garden on Daleford Road." 
But Siri can also book reservations, thanks to integration with OpenTable.com. 
You can say, for example, "Make a reservation at an inexpensive Italian 
restaurant Saturday night at 7." 

Similarly, Siri provides attractive, consolidated answer screens for, "What 
movies are opening this week?" "Give me the reviews for 'The Way, Way Back,' " 
or "What are today's showtimes for 'The Smurfs 2'?" Android just shows you 
Google search results. 

And then there's the issue of personality: Siri has it, Android doesn't. 

We're talking about wisecracks, jokes, attitude, addressing you by name. If you 
ask Siri, "Who's your daddy?", she replies: "You are. Can we get back to work 
now?" Say, "Beam me up, Siri," and she says: "Please remove your belt, shoes 
and jacket, and empty your pockets." Say, "Talk dirty to me," and she replies, 
"Humus. Compost. Pumice. Silt. Gravel." 

Now, on the great battlefield of the Apple-Google fanboy war, humor is small 
potatoes. Apple haters practically claw their eyes out when you mention Siri's 
personality. "It's not useful! It's a parlor trick! It strains me to avoid 
profanity in describing how stupid you sound!" 

And that's fine. That's why there's choice: two camps in this philosophical 
school. (Well, there's also Windows Phone and BlackBerry, but their speech 
recognition is extremely rudimentary.) 

And so: Put down your swords, fanboys. Both systems are exceedingly useful, 
once you spend the time to learn them. (Here's a site with a good list of 
Android voice commands: 

http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech/288505/70-things-try-googles-android-41-voice-search

 

And here's one for Siri: 

http://techblog.tv/full-list-of-siri-commands-how-to-use-siri/

 

Here is the link to a mp3 file.

j.mp/16Yy4yy.) 

 

Though Siri has the edge, the gap has closed substantially, and both systems 
are rapidly improving. For example, until recently Android had no phone-control 
features at all - only Web searches. And in this fall's iOS 7 update, Siri will 
gain a more pleasant speaking voice, faster searches and the ability to change 
settings by voice ("Turn on Airplane Mode," "Turn up the brightness," "Turn on 
Bluetooth") - something neither phone can do now. 

This much is clear: Cellphone speech recognition is getting better fast. Very 
soon, we'll do less talking through our phones - and more talking to them. 

 

 

Verse and thought of the week

Ephesians 6:11
Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the 
schemes of the devil. (ESV) 

Thought: The Whole Armor of God

Ephesians tells us we're in a conflict with the devil. It's not a battle of 
flesh and blood, but against spiritual forces of evil. God has provided us with 
protective armor, but we must put on the whole armor in order to stand against 
the devil. If we're only using part of our armor, we will likely fall prey to 
the enemy's schemes. 

If you're falling down more than you're standing firm in the faith, perhaps you 
need to learn how to put on the full armor of God. For a clear and biblical 
explanation of the whole armor of God, check out this article. 

http://www.gotquestions.org/full-armor-of-God.html

 

 

To receive emails regarding Dan's daily Tips or the Daily HotSpot Devotional, 
send an email to dthompson5@xxxxxxxxx with "subscribe Dan's Tips" or "subscribe 
Hotspot Devotional" in the subjectline.   

This email has been scanned by MSA

 

Other related posts:

  • » [accesscomp] Fw: Android vs. Siri, Dan's tip for September 4th 2013 - Bob Acosta