[access-uk] Re: changes at amazon
- From: "Steve Nutt" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:54:03 -0000
Hi Caroline,
My guess is it is JAWS, not the operating system. What version of JAWS do
you have? For example, if you have new JAWS and IE7, then it may not work.
If you have old JAWS and IE8 then it still might not work. I think that you
have to really have JAWS 10 and up for IE 8.
Why not update the other machine to IE 8?
All the best
Steve
All the best
Steve
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Caroline Ford
Sent: Saturday 13 February 2010 22:45
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Re: changes at amazon
David,
Which operating system are you using? It's working for me on Vista but not
XP, although I wouldn't expect this to make a difference.
Caroline.
_____
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
David Russell
Sent: 13 February 2010 22:02
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Re: changes at amazon
am using IE8 and it is not showing as it should.
-----Original Message-----
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Caroline Ford
Sent: 13 February 2010 21:47
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Re: changes at amazon
I've tried Amazon on two PC's, one using IE7 and Windows XP and the other
IE8 and Vista. On the PC with IE7, the combo box for selecting the
department seemed to have disappeared, while on the PC using IE8, it was
still there and as accessible as it has always been. I can only think
Amazon has done something to that combo box which doesn't display well in
older versions of IE.
I would be interested to know if anyone else can tie the changes down to
browser version, or if it's just a quirk on my machines.
Caroline.
_____
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
TONY CRETNEY
Sent: 13 February 2010 13:26
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Re: changes at amazon
i was on there the other day and it seemed fine to me too!
Tony
----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Roberts <mailto:a.t_roberts02@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:41 PM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: changes at amazon
I've not noticed any difference in the Amazon site. I've just loged onto it
and the search area on the home page doesn't look any different to me.
Andrew
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
David Russell
Sent: 11 February 2010 21:40
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Re: changes at amazon
Yes, have not really worked it out as yet. I have to search under all
departments, but it seems to work well enough. sometimes I get the webpage
cannot be displayed message.
If anyone finds a work around please let us know.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Damon
Sent: 11 February 2010 21:32
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] changes at amazon
Is anyone else having a few difficulties with the new re-imagined Amazon
home page and search?
How do you choose which department you search now? It seems screenreader
unfriendly.
Tha
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4421 (20090913) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4859 (20100211) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4859 (20100211) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4859 (20100211) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4859 (20100211) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4859 (20100211) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4859 (20100211) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4864 (20100213) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4864 (20100213) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4864 (20100213) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4864 (20100213) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4864 (20100213) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4864 (20100213) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4864 (20100213) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
Other related posts:
