[access-uk] Re: Kaaza not like it was

  • From: "Barry" <bbinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 10:12:06 +0100

It's pretty freaky but it's true.  It was an article on Radio 4 earlier this 
week.  I'll have a look on the net and see what I can find on it.
Barry H 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Justin R 
  To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 9:06 AM
  Subject: [access-uk] Re: Kaaza not like it was



  >: "Barry" <bbinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  >Subject: [access-uk] Re: Kaaza not like it was


  > One such British based music download company >is going to be launched
  soon - Oxfam.  Yes, >Oxfam are planning to make a music download >site .  I
  don't know any more details than this, though.

  Oxfam!!!! doing an online download music service?  hahahahaha!!!! this is
  the funniest thing I've heard in a week! it's novel <grin>.

  Justin

  > Barry H
  >
  >   ----- Original Message ----- 
  >   From: Ray's Home
  >   To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  >   Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 1:53 AM
  >   Subject: [access-uk] Re: Kaaza not like it was
  >
  >
  >   Yvonne Peter and others.  I have to confess to never having downloaded
  music
  >   off one of these file sharing sites.  Apart from the very variable
  quality,
  >   I've never liked the idea of making stuff available to others from my
  >   computer.  Its yet another chance for hackers and virus writers to get
  at
  >   you too.  Sorry if that sounds paranoid.  Paid for legal download
  services
  >   are becoming more common now, Itunes - not available in the UK yet -
  being
  >   the most well known at the moment.  I shall probably sign up with one of
  >   these eventually.
  >
  >   I'd say that if you are thinking of getting things like portable MP3
  players
  >   on which to enjoy your music, then the accessability of these players
  leaves
  >   a heck of a lot to be desired.  Saying that though, some VI and blind
  people
  >   are finding it possible to get to grips with the Archose players, just
  to
  >   name one.  There has also been talk of one player having been made
  >   accessable with talking menues by some blind programmers, though haven't
  >   heard any more news on that front recently.
  >
  >   When it comes to makiing music electronically these days, well that's
  >   another nightmare as so many keyboards are menue driven or use
  >   touch-screens.  There is a whole area of gross inaccessability here to
  be
  >   tackled, and at least the problem of accessing mobile phones is being
  >   tackled now at a price.  A general solution is needed for these devices
  >   which will not come about until some form of standardised operating
  system
  >   starts being used, like Cynbian is being used on some mobile phones now.
  >
  >   Ray.
  >
  >   ----- Original Message ----- 
  >   From: "Yvonne Stewart" <yvonne.stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  >   To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  >   Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 3:03 PM
  >   Subject: [access-uk] Re: Kaaza not like it was
  >
  >
  >   > Hi Rob
  >   > I'm going to repeat myself here.  When I finish work, unless I decide
  >   > to completely give up on the tech, I hope to cope with music, even if
  it
  >   > has to be on a limited basis, and I think the law should support
  >   > accessibility for blind people.  Perhaps we should give our MP's some
  >   > ear- and headaches.  When I hear of the magic that's available to the
  >   > sighted population, when listening to QVC, I feel we're being left
  well
  >   > behind.  Ok, to a point, that's our tough luck, but I just don't feel
  >   > the government is making any attempt to support us.  Trying to get
  >   > Braille these days is hard work.  Maybe I'm wrong, but the impression
  >   > I'm getting is that the more advanced the software gets, the less
  >   > accessible it is even for existing programs.  Anyway, I'm going home
  now
  >   > and leaving the technology behind for another day.
  >   >
  >   > Sorry, moaning again.
  >   >
  >   > Yvonne and Libby.
  >   >
  >   > >>> rinty@xxxxxxxxxx 25/05/04 13:46:07 >>>
  >   > To be honest, with the exception of audio books, they're none of them
  >   > worth it.  None of them work that well with screen-readers, the
  >   > download speeds aren't great, and the quality of the files isn't
  >   > always good.  I'd set one up just for blind people, but it's illegal,
  >   > and I'd never break the law!.
  >   > Rob
  >   >
  >   > -----Original Message-----
  >   > From: access-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  >   > [mailto:access-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Peter Logue
  >   > Sent: 25 May 2004 13:38
  >   > To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  >   > Subject: [access-uk] Kaaza not like it was
  >   >
  >   >
  >   > For me, Kaaza isn't the same as it used to be. With recent downloads,
  >   > I
  >   > think you are now forced to upgrade to the latest version or you don't
  >   > get
  >   > the option to search. When you upgrade to the new version you are
  >   > asked to
  >   > install and use the Kaaza media desktop which is a real pain in the
  >   > butt to
  >   > use with a screen reader. I haven't been able to use Kazza for ages.
  >   >
  >   > Peter
  >   >
  >   >
  >   >
  >   >
  >   >
  >   > ---
  >   > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
  >   > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
  >   > Version: 6.0.690 / Virus Database: 451 - Release Date: 22/05/2004
  >   >
  >   > ---
  >   > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
  >   > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
  >   > Version: 6.0.690 / Virus Database: 451 - Release Date: 22/05/2004
  >   >
  >   >
  >
  >
  >
  >



Other related posts: