[access-uk] Re: Diskeeper 2009 versus standard defrag
- From: "Steve Nutt" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:07:32 -0000
Hi Ibrahim,
Premier is mainly for servers. Professional I believe is for business
licencing, but you can find out the differences from the web site. You only
need the home edition I would expect.
All the best
Steve
_____
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Ibrahim Gucukoglu
Sent: Tuesday 20 January 2009 09:15
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Diskeeper 2009 versus standard defrag
Hi Steve.
OK, fair enough, I'm interested. What is the difference between home and
professional versions then? I'd also like to know what exactly home premier
offers considering its very expensive.
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Nutt <mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:12 AM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Diskeeper 2009 versus standard defrag
Hi Ibrahim,
It will defrag the swap file, which standard defrag does not. It will also
defrag locked files, which again the standard does not.
Finally, you can just set it and forget it, and it will automatically defrag
files that become fragmented. So you don't ever have to defrag manually.
Good enough?
All the best
Steve
_____
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Ibrahim Gucukoglu
Sent: Monday 19 January 2009 03:41
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Diskeeper 2009 versus standard defrag
Hi Everyone.
I've been looking in to this product Diskeeper which people seem to be able
to work well with. What I want to know is what performance enhancements it
will bring me over the standard windows defrag which I've been using up till
now on a scheduled basis when I'm not using the computer.
Other related posts:
