[access-uk] Re: Diskeeper 2009 versus standard defrag

  • From: "Vanja Sudar" <vanja@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:45:10 -0000

What I personally like about disckeeper is that you don't have to do anything. 
It runs as a windows service, defrags on it's own, optimising it appropriately 
depending on if computer is  idle or in use.
MSN/windows live messenger: sudar23@xxxxxxxxxxx
AIM: vanja121
Skype: vanja121
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ibrahim Gucukoglu 
  To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 3:41 AM
  Subject: [access-uk] Diskeeper 2009 versus standard defrag

  Hi Everyone.

  I've been looking in to this product Diskeeper which people seem to be able 
to work well with.  What I want to know is what performance enhancements it 
will bring me over the standard windows defrag which I've been using up till 
now on a scheduled basis when I'm not using the computer.

Other related posts: