[access-uk] Re: A WP51 QUERY - CAST YOUR MINDS BACK!

  • From: "carol pearson" <carol.pearson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 20:56:16 +0100

Yes, there are quite a lot, but I'll go the simple route and get the job
done without having to remember them all myself.

Thanks for helping me to reach this decision.


--
Carol



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew Hodgson" <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 7:44 PM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: A WP51 QUERY - CAST YOUR MINDS BACK!


> Carol,
>
> To iterate what David said, I think it may be easier to deal with this
> as a text file rather than a WP51 file, has the original file got many
> WP51 codes in it (I am remembering more on this than I really wanted
> to!).=20
>
> Andrew.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: access-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
> > [mailto:access-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of carol pearson
> > Sent: 23 May 2004 19:22
> > To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [access-uk] Re: A WP51 QUERY - CAST YOUR MINDS BACK!
> >=20
> > I probably will, David, and keep it simple and sure.
> >=20
> >=20
> > --
> > Carol
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > ----- Original Message -----=20
> > From: "David W Wood" <g3yxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 5:22 PM
> > Subject: [access-uk] Re: A WP51 QUERY - CAST YOUR MINDS BACK!
> >=20
> >=20
> > > Carol
> > >
> > >
> > > why not indicate with:
> > >
> > > /// that was the beginning of the text to change ///
> > >
> > > *** this is how it should really read ***
> > >
> > > at least is compatible in all formats - even .txt!
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > >
> > > In message <00af01c44049$19062580$6401a8c0@FABIAN2>, carol pearson
> > > <carol.pearson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
> > > >Can anyone remember much about WP51?  I'm proof-reading a book for
> > someone
> > > >who still uses it and am myself using MS Office 2002.
> > > >
> > > >I'd like to indicate recommended changes etc in WORD then=20
> > save the file
> > in
> > > >WP51 format, but am not sure if, then, they will be=20
> > recognised in WP51.
> > Is
> > > >there any way of doing this, please?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >Carol
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --=20
> > > David W Wood
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
>



Other related posts: