[access-uk] Re: The delivery report failure explained/=20 general fault
- From: "Justin R" <mypc128@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 22:05:34 +0100
Hi Simon, George and Andrew,
Brilliant, that's fine, well sort of <grin>. at least it's not down to
zoomtext 8.11. app reader doesn't read e-mails all that well as it does
with previous version so, gotta make a note of everything it does. I can
cout out the =20 especially as simons HAL is picking this up.
cheers,
Justin
----- Original Message -----
From: "simon.dowling" <simodowl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 7:40 PM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: The delivery report failure explained
> hi Justin, I get the same =20 thing I think it may be to do with av
> software.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin R" <mypc128@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 7:33 PM
> Subject: [access-uk] Re: The delivery report failure explained
>
>
> oh, i see. nothing I can do about it I assume. it comes from an address
> called visionCentre.org. which I think you've mentioned before.
>
> just one thing, my screen reader keeps saying =20 after yours and George's
> e-mail. Hope its nothing to do with the upgrade zoomtext version I'm
> demo-ing. I ask cause I might have to report that, along some other
> numerous bugs to AiSquared.
>
> Justin
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Hodgson" <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 6:40 PM
> Subject: [access-uk] Re: The delivery report failure explained
>
>
> > Justin,
> >
> > Its precisely why the email is being delivered to the list why you are
> > getting the report. The report is generated by a subscriber's mail
> > server, not by the list administration or anything like that.=20
> >
> > Andrew.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: access-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
> > > [mailto:access-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Justin R
> > > Sent: 23 May 2004 17:01
> > > To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [access-uk] Re: The delivery report failure explained
> > >=20
> > > but what about some of us who got these failed delivery=20
> > > report, via e-mail
> > > but yet are e-mails to the list did get throuhg anyway. now,=20
> > > I'm sending
> > > this, I'll see if postmaster does send me a return e-mail,=20
> > > lol. strange
> > > that is.
> > >=20
> > > Justin
> > > ----- Original Message -----=20
> > > From: "Colin @ New Vision" <cph.newvision@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 1:03 PM
> > > Subject: [access-uk] Re: The delivery report failure explained
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > > Hi Andrew
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the information at least it confirms that I am=20
> > > not the source
> > > of
> > > > the problems.
> > > >
> > > > Colin
> > > > New Vision
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----=20
> > > > From: "Andrew Hodgson" <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 12:06 PM
> > > > Subject: [access-uk] The delivery report failure explained
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Firstly, this is nothing to do with Freelists, or=20
> > > Newvision. The bounce
> > > > > is caused by someone using an incorrectly configured copy=20
> > > of Exchange
> > > > > server and the POP3 connecter, which is trying to bounce=20
> > > messages back
> > > > > to the list.
> > > > >
> > > > > The effected domains are:
> > > > > *@visioncenter.org
> > > > > Or vision@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > > If I was the moderator, I would remove these addresses=20
> > > from the list,
> > > > > then email them regarding what is happening, then its up=20
> > > to them to deal
> > > > > with the problem, and then resubscribe. I doubt they are=20
> > > getting the
> > > > > messages at present, anyway, as the connector doesn't=20
> > > know where to
> > > > > deliver the message to by the looks of things.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope this helps,
> > > > > Andrew.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > >=20
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
- » [access-uk] Re: The delivery report failure explained/=20 general fault
