Colin - The trouble in that it's impossible to be anything like
realistic for this era. Even by lateish Cold War, it was all dominated
by radar, SAMs and above all ECM.
And those ECM details were incredibly highly classified, because if you
knew how to jam the opponent's data comms to their SAMs it was game-over.
That's particularly true of Soviet/Russian SAMs because almost all of
them are centrally controlled by the engagement radar.
The analogue era ended some time ago.
Likewise for air-to-air, it all became beyond-visual-range and ECM four
decades ago.
None of this can be realistically modelled in a sim, because the sim
makers won't have the information.
This is why I rarely fly anything post-war. It's pure fantasy.
56RAF_phoenix
On 22/05/2021 10:52, Colin (Redacted sender bart_56 for DMARC) wrote:
Along video forget about the some of the stuff, but what I thought was good about it was the scale of the operation and that someone was prepared to put it together.
Looked impressive.
DCS video: https://youtu.be/0CeaD_6ltDg ;<https://youtu.be/0CeaD_6ltDg>
Colin
On 19 May 2021, at 19:32, Colin <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Been flying DCS most of the week flying the MkIX and F-86 on the Quest 2 which runs DCS a lot better than the Index. The Quest 2 with ASW 90hz to 45hz but @2704x2736 (Index 2016x2240) and higher in game settings, it has less ghosting hardly any.
