[Wittrs] A New Bizarre Claim
- From: Joseph Polanik <jpolanik@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 05:51:30 -0400
SWM wrote:
>Joseph Polanik wrote:
>>the meaning of 'identity' that is consistent with the is of
>>constitution (and, often, with claims of constitution not using 'is')
>>is not identical to the meaning of 'identity' that is consistent with
>>Leibniz's Law.
>That's certainly true but the idea of "conceptually true" is dependent
>on the notion of logical identity (a thing is the same as itself).
what is the basis of your claim that "the idea of 'conceptually true' is
dependent on the notion of logical identity"?
Joe
--
Nothing Unreal is Self-Aware
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
http://what-am-i.net
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
==========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
Other related posts:
