[Wittrs] Re: When is "brain talk" really dualism? (nominalism, yet again)

  • From: "jrstern" <jrstern@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:28:24 -0000

--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kirby urner <kirby.urner@...> wrote:
>
> > I dunno, Kirby.
> >
> > Thought we could communicate, you and I, around these
> > computational examples, but doesn't seem to be happening.
> 
> I think we're doing just fine.  To communicate doesn't mean to agree 
> does it?

When Mr. Namespace doesn't grok nominalism, at all,
we're not communicating.

Josh

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. wittrs
  3. Archive
  4. 09-2009