[windows2000] Re: Raid5 on WinXP

  • From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:01:47 +0200

It's a legacy thing. I don't have anywhere to offload the 4,5x160GB data I
already have on the array while switching drives. Besided, as mentioned
before, I've already filled my hardware/budget quota with a new portable
computer while at the same time my boss doesn't understand why I need to do
this in the first place. 

"Computers just work", "Why do you need so much space" and other memorable
sayings are known to have come from my boss.

-- 
/Sorin

>-----Original Message-----
>From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:windows2000-
>bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data
Corp.
>Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 12:35 PM
>To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [windows2000] Re: Raid5 on WinXP
>
>>>First thing that comes to mind...is why would anyone put Windows XP... on
>RAID 5
>
>Better question.  With drives in the terabyte range being so inexpensive
why
>bother with trying to span 160GB disks?
>
>**********************
>To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
>mode or view archives use the below link.
>
>http://www.freelists.org/list/windows2000

Other related posts: