[visionegg] Re: working code for fMRI exp: comments please
- From: Andrew Straw <andrew.straw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: visionegg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 23:20:49 -0600
Christoph Lehmann wrote:
Hi
Here the code (main loop) of a small visionegg project, which waits for
a trigger on the parallel port, after a received trigger it updates the
screen with the next stimulus, and all mouse-responses are logged in a
file with the RT (relative to the actual stimulus). Also all stimuli
are
logged into a file with stimulus-name and onset-time
What do you think about the timing-quality?
Without running it, it looks great.
(snip)
Andrew, if I sync buffer-swapping: does the swap_buffers() code wait
for
the vsync pulse, and therefore during this time I will have an
unprecision in the RT?
The swap_buffers() code does wait for the vsync pulse before returning,
but the VisionEgg.time_func() still returns a precise time. So, your
measure of response time should be as accurate as possible,
particularly because you are not swapping buffers while waiting for
mouse presses.
======================================
The Vision Egg mailing list
Archives: http://www.freelists.org/archives/visionegg
Website: http://www.visionegg.org/mailinglist.html
- References:
- [visionegg] working code for fMRI exp: comments please
- From: Christoph Lehmann
Other related posts:
- » [visionegg] working code for fMRI exp: comments please
- » [visionegg] Re: working code for fMRI exp: comments please
Here the code (main loop) of a small visionegg project, which waits for
a trigger on the parallel port, after a received trigger it updates the
screen with the next stimulus, and all mouse-responses are logged in a
file with the RT (relative to the actual stimulus). Also all stimuli are
logged into a file with stimulus-name and onset-time
What do you think about the timing-quality?
the vsync pulse, and therefore during this time I will have an
unprecision in the RT?
- [visionegg] working code for fMRI exp: comments please
- From: Christoph Lehmann