Rich, Thank you so very much for pointing out my mistake. When I was searching on MPG for this moth I was looking at 6368 and 6370. Somehow I never looked at 6362. I was looking at the elliptical area at the top of the wings and 6362 didn't show that. I guess if I had looked further I might have discovered it. I am very pleased to meet you. I am going to try to be more active on this list. I just have been extremely busy this summer. You probably won't believe this but I have almost 10,000 moth photos to go through just from my yard this summer. That of course doesn't represent the number of species. Many are duplicate. If you are interested, I have posted quite a few photos on BG. It is such great fun and I will be excited to see just how many species I can identify from my yard this year. Hope everyone has good finds tonight. Carol Wolf Woodbury, TN Cannon County On Sep 15, 2010, at 6:43 PM, rdhealy1951@xxxxxxx wrote: > Carol are you sure your 6368 is not 6362 Digrammia continuata this moth is > common through out our area. What is the range of 6368? > Rich