I do agree with accepting sight records submitted by certain persons and for certain species (some should always have photo documentation). But.....which persons and which species? Who would determine that, since I don't assume there is a Tennessee Butterfly Records Committee like there is for birds? Who would want to be the one to tell an individual that we won't be accepting his or her sight records? David Trently Avian Pursuits Nature Tours ...come see the real world! Knoxville, TN http://avianpursuits.com/ ________________________________ From: Rikki Hall <sourpersimmon@xxxxxxxxx> To: birdsongteam@xxxxxxxxxxx Cc: tn-butterflies@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sat, August 14, 2010 6:31:47 PM Subject: [TN-Butterflies] Re: is this photo of sufficient quality to document a giant swallowtail in jackson county For decades, birders have been accepting/rejecting sightings based largely on the reputation of the person who reports the sighting. I suspect we'd all believe Steve saw something as unmistakable as a giant swallowtail even if he didn't have a camera. As far as I'm concerned, an unfocused shot consistent with the ID is more than adequate. Rikki Hall On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Steve Stedman <birdsongteam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: The attached photo was all I could get before this big fellow took off and disappeared. > >I am thinking it is just too poor a photo to document this swallowtail in >Jackson County, but am wondering what others think should be done with it. > >Any candid thoughts welcome, shared or sent only to me. > >Thanks, Steve Stedman >Cookeville (Putnam County) > >Note: I did obtain five better quality photos that documented Fiery Skipper, >Little Glassywing, Dun Skipper, Little Yellow, and Gray Hairstreak in Jackson >County; presumably these constitute FOY records as well. sjs > >Download Photoshop(R) Album Starter Edition free to create your own photo >slideshows! > >http://www.adobe.com/getstarteredition