[tinwhiskers] Re: Not exactly tin whiskers, but I seek your support.
- From: "John Burke" <John@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:08:15 -0800
I just posted this:
No unusual reliability issues.....$3+Billion on ONE project failure of
XBOX-360 failures...LOL no unusual reliability issues....now that is funny.
John
_____
From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fritz, Dennis D.
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 12:18 PM
To: tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tinwhiskers] Not exactly tin whiskers, but I seek your support.
Recently, on the Circuits Assembly blog, Dr Ron Lasky published a column,
bragging about the reliability of lead-free electronics - based on the
presentations at a session of SMTAI where he was the chairman. All of these
papers were about commercial electronics, and are well done.
Dr Ron goes on to infer that lead-free electronics should be accepted as
reliable, (in my interpretation) for all environments and situations. Dr
Ron implies that scientists against lead-free are just wrong.
I maintain that the information in this column in Circuits Assembly is very
misleading - regarding harsh environments. I cite the three papers later at
SMTAI from the NASA/DoD participants who each state "lead based assembly
out-performed lead-free in these harsh tests".
Here is the link to the Lasky column:
http://circuitsassembly.com/blog/?p=1332
Please read it, and add your comments if you wish. Should you feel inclined
to drop a note to Circuits Assembly or to Mike Buetow, I am not going to
stop you.
Thanks - Denny Fritz
Other related posts:
