The default port is 27000 and then it uses a dynamic port for license allocation. We hard codes it so we can traverse firewalls for servers in our dmz
Sent from my iPhone On Jun 10, 2009, at 14:52, Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When y'all setup a license server like this, did you leave the default port in place or change it? I am looking at doing this but I remember seeing something about dynamic ports when left as default. Just curious what you have seen in reality.How did you implement a hot spare license server? GregOn Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Magnus Hjorleifsson <magnus@xxxxxxxx> wrote: I have a set up like like this. 3 farms (US, Emea, Apac) with one licensing server in the US(and back up that is a hot spare in a different data center). Works greatSent from my iPhoneOn Jun 10, 2009, at 2:02, Angela Smith <angela_smith9@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi AndrewWe are running License Server Version 2.0.0 (old I know). Ive turned the PNAgent automatic refresh off so this shouldn't be an issue. Unfortunately we are not licensed for Edgesite.. The document doesn't really provide any best practices around License Server placement on a network. Will test and see how I go.Does anyone out there do this currently? IE have a CTX License Server across the WAN from their CPS Farm?Thanks Ang From: andrew.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Web Interface across a WAN? Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:09:39 +0100 Angela,Page 17 of the latest WI Admin Guide (http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX116590 ) – or page 21 of the 4,5 WI Admin guide. Which WI are you running?The WI servers communicate with the Citrix XML ServiceWI Service would communicate on a refresh/logon. PNAgent would communicate on logon/user request refresh & whenever you’d configu red an automatic refreshThere are advanced settings for XML Communication timeout – I thin k the default is about 1 minI wouldn’t expect a significant change based on what you’ve said – but the latest Ctx Edgesight for loadtesting release has the abi lity to launch Web interface connections – so you could test from where you are now, and then test again from the states to confirm.From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Angela SmithSent: 09 June 2009 08:14 To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Web Interface across a WAN? HiOur company is looking at moving our Citrix Web Interface server to our US Head Office. All other Citrix Servers will remain in our country. We use Citrix Presentation Server 4 with Citrix Web Interface client and PNAgent clients. Will I encounter performance issues if the Web Interface Servers (running on Windows 2003) are moved across the WAN? WAN Link size is around 20Mb and not busy.Do the WI and PNAgent clients communicate frequently with the Web Interface servers for config refreshes or is the Web Interface only accessed when logging on? I do not have a good understanding of Citrix communication flows with WI. If anyone has a diagram that would assist then that would be fantastic.Regards AngelaFind your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to rent, share or buy this winter?Click here to find out more POP access for Hotmail is here!
