[THIN] Re: Web Interface across a WAN?
- From: Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:52:49 -0500
When y'all setup a license server like this, did you leave the default port
in place or change it? I am looking at doing this but I remember seeing
something about dynamic ports when left as default. Just curious what you
have seen in reality.
How did you implement a hot spare license server?
Greg
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Magnus Hjorleifsson <magnus@xxxxxxxx>wrote:
> I have a set up like like this. 3 farms (US, Emea, Apac) with one licensing
> server in the US(and back up that is a hot spare in a different data
> center). Works great
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 10, 2009, at 2:02, Angela Smith <angela_smith9@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew
>
> We are running License Server Version 2.0.0 (old I know). Ive turned the
> PNAgent automatic refresh off so this shouldn't be an issue. Unfortunately
> we are not licensed for Edgesite.. The document doesn't really provide any
> best practices around License Server placement on a network. Will test and
> see how I go.
>
> Does anyone out there do this currently? IE have a CTX License Server
> across the WAN from their CPS Farm?
>
> Thanks
> Ang
>
> ------------------------------
> From: <andrew.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>andrew.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Web Interface across a WAN?
> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:09:39 +0100
>
> Angela,
>
>
>
> Page 17 of the latest WI Admin Guide (
> http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX116590) – or page 21 of the 4,5 WI
> Admin guide. Which WI are you running?
>
>
>
> The WI servers communicate with the Citrix XML Service
>
>
>
> WI Service would communicate on a refresh/logon. PNAgent would communicate
> on logon/user request refresh & whenever you’d configured an automatic
> refresh
>
>
>
> There are advanced settings for XML Communication timeout – I think the
> default is about 1 min
>
>
>
> I wouldn’t expect a significant change based on what you’ve said – but the
> latest Ctx Edgesight for loadtesting release has the ability to launch Web
> interface connections – so you could test from where you are now, and then
> test again from the states to confirm.
>
>
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> *On Behalf Of *Angela Smith
> *Sent:* 09 June 2009 08:14
> *To:* <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Web Interface across a WAN?
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> Our company is looking at moving our Citrix Web Interface server to our US
> Head Office. All other Citrix Servers will remain in our country. We use
> Citrix Presentation Server 4 with Citrix Web Interface client and PNAgent
> clients. Will I encounter performance issues if the Web Interface Servers
> (running on Windows 2003) are moved across the WAN? WAN Link size is around
> 20Mb and not busy.
>
> Do the WI and PNAgent clients communicate frequently with the Web Interface
> servers for config refreshes or is the Web Interface only accessed when
> logging on? I do not have a good understanding of Citrix communication
> flows with WI. If anyone has a diagram that would assist then that would be
> fantastic.
>
> Regards
> Angela
> ------------------------------
>
> Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to rent,
> share or buy this
> winter?<http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http://ninemsn.domain.com.au/?s_cid%3DFDMedia:NineMSN_Hotmail_Tagline&_t=774152450&_r=Domain_tagline&_m=EXT>
>
> ------------------------------
> Click here to find out more POP access for Hotmail is
> here!<http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=802246>
>
>
Other related posts:
