[THIN] Re: WIN2K3 TS CALS
- From: Jason Miller <jmiller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 16:00:28 -0400
My take: Per user would be your best bet unless in a situation where you've
got maybe a couple terminals which are accessed by a large number of
users...then device licensing is the way to go. Other than that, per user
would be the right direction to take.
-----Original Message-----
From: Schneider, Chad M [mailto:CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 3:54 PM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] WIN2K3 TS CALS
As I move to WIN2K3 for my farm, I have a 2003 AD DC with TS Licensing
running on it. It is currently dispensing WIN2K TS Cals.
I want to be able to use the WIN2K3 server, so I gather I need 2K3 TS Cals,
to connect to 2K3 TS/Citrix servers.
Should I choose per client or per user licensing? Why? What is more
efficient/robust? I am thinking per user is the better bet.
Chad M. Schneider
Technology Analyst
Bemis Corporate IT
920-303-7609
Other related posts:
