(posted again :) ) http://knowledgemap.nai.com/KanisaSupportSite/search.do?cmd=displayKCPopup&docType=kc&externalId=KBkb39839xml&sliceId=&dialogID=1060507 Andrew On 11/08/05, LDS <u2htdaab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I run McAfee VirusScan 7.1 on my TS and while I have had no noticable > problems, this thread prompted me to check my connections and I see > that each user is in fact running updaterui.exe. I do not see the > entry in HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CV\Run. > > Any other suggestions on how to eliminate this process for each user? > > On 8/11/05, Pardee, Michael P. <MPardee@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Very good answer. Jumping in here, we have used McAfee for what seems like > > forever. > > > > We have always suspected that AV was one of the culprits stopping us from > > getting more users on a server. We had some issues with McAfee and had to > > remove it from a server to do some troubleshooting. A server that struggled > > to support 60 users suddenly was able to handle 90. That seemed strange to > > us so we tried it with a different server and saw similar results. This was > > still in the NT4 world though and we haven not tried that test on > > Windows2003. That is coming. > > > > We have had strange cluster issues that we have been working on with > > Microsoft for months. They keep running out of Page Pool memory. Recently > > we found that we had the exact same cluster issue with a brand new cluster > > with very little activity on it running the latest and greatest from McAfee > > (8.x). We opened another case with McAfee last night and they told us this > > issue is resolved in Patch 10 and we applied it last night. > > > > So, now we're watching and monitoring everything to see if the patch makes > > any difference. If not, I am comfortable looking for other solutions since > > we gave this one years to get resolved. I have heard great things about > > Trend and with a recent acquisition we now have access to it for testing. > > The first place I intend to try it is on a Citrix server to see if there is > > any difference in resource utilization. > > > > What seems to be true is not every product works perfectly for everyone. > > While many will jump in and say McAfee has been perfect for them, just as > > many will probably say it was a disaster. It comes down to what works best > > for your environment since you are ultimately responsible for it. > > ________________________________ > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 8:35 AM > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: A/V for enterprise environments - again > > > > > > Good answer. > > ________________________________ > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > > Of Raffensberger, Stephen D > > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 7:27 AM > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: A/V for enterprise environments - again > > > > > > > > > > I just remove it from HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Run. > > > > > > Steve Raffensberger > > > > Sovereign Bank > > Mail Stop 10-411-NS1 > > 1125 Berkshire Blvd. > > Wyomissing, PA 19610 > > Email: sraffens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > From: Ruben Spruijt [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ruben > > Spruijt > > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 6:58 AM > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: [THIN] Re: OT: A/V for enterprise environments - again > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > How do you handle the updaterUI.exe that will start for each user on the > > terminal server. > > > > > > One 'workaround' is the remove the updaterUI.exe .. > > > > > > What are you doing for this file ?. > > > > > > > > > > > > with regards, > > > > > > Ruben > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Dogers > > Sent: Thu 8/11/2005 11:04 AM > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: A/V for enterprise environments - again > > > > > > On 10/08/05, Evan Mann <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I've never seen Trend's enterprise solution, but have seen parts of > > > McAfee's. I know Trend seems to be the big winner for Citrix > > environments, > > > which is a check for the corner of Trend. I'm looking for other input as > > to > > > why I might want to invest more time trying out Trend or McAfee, or > > > considering someone else's product. > > > > Never tried Trend, we've always used McAfee and they've been fine > > since, well, forever! > > > > It meets all your requirements, Groupshield works fine for virus > > scanning, but we don't use its antispam side of things.. We use > > Protection Pilot instead of the ePolicy Orchestrator, as we're a small > > shop, and it does all the same things, just easier :) > > > > I know some people like Sophos too, but never had a look at that > > either, could be something else for you to look at. > > > > Andrew > > ******************************************************** > > New Site from The Kenzig Group VistaPop.com! > > Windows Vista Links, Subscribe to Vista Discussion List > > at Freelists.org and more! See: > > http://www.VistaPop.com > > ********************************************************** > > Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: > > http://thin.net/links.cfm > > ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities! > > http://www.thinwiki.com > > *********************************************************** > > For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or > > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: > > http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm > > > > > > > > This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. > > Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), > > you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information > > contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please > > advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete or destroy the message. > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this transmission > > is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be subject to protection > > under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability > > Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use of the individual or > > entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you > > are notified that any use, distribution or copying of the message is > > strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil penalties. If > > you received this transmission in error, please contact the sender > > immediately by replying to this email and delete the material from any > > computer. > ******************************************************** > New Site from The Kenzig Group VistaPop.com! > Windows Vista Links, Subscribe to Vista Discussion List > at Freelists.org and more! See: > http://www.VistaPop.com > ********************************************************** > Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: > http://thin.net/links.cfm > ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities! > http://www.thinwiki.com > *********************************************************** > For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: > http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm > ******************************************************** New Site from The Kenzig Group VistaPop.com! Windows Vista Links, Subscribe to Vista Discussion List at Freelists.org and more! See: http://www.VistaPop.com ********************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thin.net/links.cfm ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities! http://www.thinwiki.com *********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm