[THIN] Re: Liceense server
- From: "Landin, Mark" <Mark.Landin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:52:42 -0500
Nah :) When I sent this, nobody else had said anything yet ... I
wouldn't have "piled on" if I'd seen the other replies first.
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Turman, David C.
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 2:40 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Liceense server
Yeah, so I drink too much. Want to make something of it?
-----Original Message-----
From: Landin, Mark [mailto:Mark.Landin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 2:29 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Liceense server
I think you are implying too much here, David.
I think the answer is assuming that you have a Windows
2003 Terminal Server (otherwise, why would you need 2003 licensing
services?) In this case, Brian is saying if the Terminal Server is your
only 2003 system, you can put 2003 License Server on it.
Q: Can I install the Windows 2003 Terminal
Server licensing service on a Terminal Server?
A: Yes. In fact, many people do this in smaller
environments, especially if the domain is Windows 2000-based and they
don't want to upgrade any other servers to Windows 2003.
Other related posts:
