* Steven Hunter (hunters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) on [05-09-00 13:40] did utter: > On Tue, 9 May 2000, John Madden wrote: > > > Well, next week is the doomed advisory board meeting, and things are looking > > really, really bad for the FCRC. > > Well, I guess I'm glad I'm out then... :( > > > As far as I know, Roseanne's the chair of the board, and from my > > conversation > > with her this afternoon, things look bad, but they could be worse. > > Basically, > > the complaint is that too much money is being spent (much more than some > > parts > > of IT, from what I hear). > > Excuse me, but WTF?? As far as I could ever tell, the FCRC is pretty > shit-poor... Dood, the FCRC's budget has always been shit. I mean, the whole time I was there we were stuck fighting for whatever scraps we could get. IMHO, the FCRC _should_ probably be under IT if it's going to do "experimental" computing like researching computing solutions for faculty and such...I think the only reason they were where they are is because when the FCRC _was_ under IT (or ACNS rather), Dr.Sher was a total nazi about how the place should be run and kept us from doing alot of the stuff we wanted to do, mainly because ACNS was so afraid of loosing total control of stuff like servers. The FCRC would probably have never been able to run their own Linux boxen under ACNS rule. Getting out from ACNS was both a good move and a bad one; on the one hand the FCRC got to run services that didn't have to be directly approved by ACNS and signed for in triplicate, on the other hand the logic that experimental campus computing should be done by a department that had nothing to do with the department on campus that ran the computer infrastructure just didn't hold water and they gradually began to force the FCRC into the bed they'd made for themselves...that of doing just distance education typing work. It's hard to justify a budget for campus computer development to a department that isn't even remotely under the jurisdiction of the computer center. If the FCRC ever wants to become more than a typing pool, it needs to get back under IT rule so it can get some real support before IT decides 'well, we have no place to do research for faculty since the FCRC just does distance education, let's make our own'. If that happens, the FCRC is just a memory. But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong. Neil ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . /._ o / --personal="caine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" /|//- / / --business="caine@xxxxxxxxxxx" / ''- / /__ --homepage="http://antediluvian.org/"; ' ~~ http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~