[tcb] Re: the Hills

  • From: Will Wood <evilscientistboo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 21:41:26 -0500 (GMT-05:00)

That's not a bad choice however make sure you also upgrade your cam. 




-----Original Message-----
From: ATX BUS
Sent: May 27, 2008 7:24 PM
To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tcb] Re: the Hills

Thank you for all of the input. I have heard a lot of variation on carb sizes for this motor so I respect everyones opinion.  I'd like to stay stock height and run a single carb, so it sounds like I need to stay with what I have. 

Maybe a 1776 is in the works for my 66. 

----- Original Message ----
From: Will Wood <evilscientistboo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 5:06:05 PM
Subject: [tcb] Re: the Hills

a 1776 is a great upgrade for a bus.  If you go beyond that let me know because I can
definitely let you know where to spend the dollars. 

-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Woodall <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: May 27, 2008 4:46 PM
>To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [tcb] Re: the Hills
>
>For what it's worth, I am yearning from more power from my bus too.
>
>It is a 1600 dual port
>010 Distributer
>Dual ICT Webers (ported and polished heads with match ported manifolds)
>Webcam 119 cam
>Counterweighted Crank/Flywheel/etc./etc.
>Custom Transaxle with taller gearing on 3rd and 4th.
>
>Cruises great around town, but a different story on the highway.
>Definitely slows down on the hills.  Part of this is probably due to me
>retarding the timing a little (trying to cool the motor down).
>When I say slows down, it's not too major but I definitely slow down
>from 65 to like 55.  Like I said, not too big of a deal.
>What gets annoying though is not wanting to hit the brakes on the
>freeway because it takes a while to build up the momentum to get back up
>to the power band.
>
>I am already planning the next engine for this bus, already got the
>block and everything.
>I just need to get a few more years out of the current one and get the
>welding, interior, and other stuff done before I upgrade.
>This next engine is going to be awesome!
>
>
>
>Will Wood wrote:
>> Alpine Redux Gears are too low for everyday flatland use.  You're
>> looking at 40MPH max with a set of those regardless of terrain.
>>
>>
>>
>>    -----Original Message-----
>>    From: ATX BUS
>>    Sent: May 27, 2008 4:13 PM
>>    To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>    Subject: [tcb] Re: the Hills
>>
>>    Personally I don't mind running slow up the hills. It is more of a
>>    safety issue.  When you are going 20 miles less than posted speed
>>    limits it can be dangerous.  And I worry about the engine being
>>    under that much stress if it is a long climb.
>>
>>    Any word on alpine gears?
>>     
>>     
>>    Jeff (atx_bus)
>>    66 So-42
>>    67 sportsmobile camper
>>
>>
>>    ----- Original Message ----
>>    From: sammie smith <bugcollections@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>    To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>    Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:02:20 PM
>>    Subject: [tcb] Re: the Hills
>>
>>    I wouldn't change anything.  That's just the way stock busses
>>    run.  Unless you want to go to big engines to correct the
>>    problem.  Come to Nacogdoches and I will let you drive the bone
>>    stock 60 panel with stock tires and a stock 40 and when you get
>>    back in yours you will think you are driving a full blown 100 hp
>>    engine.
>>
>>    */ATX BUS <atx_bus@xxxxxxxxx>/* wrote:
>>
>>        I have  a carb/gear/tire question.
>>
>>        Running a 1600 single port.  Any opinions on size of carb out
>>        there?  I am currently running a 30 pict 1.
>>
>>        It runs great in the realitively flat stretchs but really
>>        doesn't power much up a hill.  I live in W Austin and there
>>        are hills between me and any where I go.  I have the stock
>>        14s, would smaller tires help?
>>
>>        Maybe the answer if alpine gears?  If so how much would
>>        performance suffer on flat ground.
>>         
>>        Jeff
>>
>>
>>
>
>



Other related posts: