I hate to say this; but most of the current Empi stuff is junk. For the most part it is Chinese copies of original stuff. I have come to the conclusion the Chinese can't reproduce anything according to specs. I avoid using Empi stuff whenever possible. ________________________________ From: Ronnie Hughes <fracdogii@xxxxxxxxx> To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 10:21:54 AM Subject: [tcb] Re: Deep oil sump Dan is correct. The last two EMPI ones I bought required extensive grinding to make room for the bolts to attach to the engine. I even used socket head cap screws to help. The last one I bought could not be modified enough to make it useful. It's still in my parts box if anyone wants it. ________________________________ From: Dan Martin <danandkatrinamartin@xxxxxxx> To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 8:10:48 AM Subject: [tcb] Re: Deep oil sump I run this one: http://www.geneberg.com/product_info.php?cPath=5_105_2726&products_id=438 Some of the empi ones I looked at were junk (buyer beware) It has never hit anything. On Jul 21, 2010, at 7:17 AM, Julie wrote: > The '68 Bus of mine is homemade camper, a one of a kind which is cool but it > is >much heavier than let's say a Westy. It has been suggested to me to perhaps >add >a deep oil sump, with the idea being that more oil will help the engine that >will be working hard moving such a heavy beast stay cooler. Do you think it is >a >good idea? > > When talking to my local parts guy he wanted to make sure that I am aware > that >the deep oil sump adds up to 2 3/4" to the bottom of the engine. There are >some >choices that are thinner but then hold less extra oil. Should I be worried >about extending the engine closer to the ground? I don't imagine doing any >crazy >off roading adventures with this Bus, it is currently in not-so-great-a-shape >so >it is odd just imagining it moving at all. > > Julie > > >