[tcb] Re: BFGs vs. Grabbers

  • From: Julie <julie.hey.ho.lets.go@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 21:38:00 -0500

Thank you Sammie for so much good info.  I really appreciate it.  

On Apr 7, 2013, at 9:20 PM, sammie smith <bugcollections@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> What year model is Murray.  I think he has the extended lip on the fender 
> wells doesn't he.  That's the late fender well and it has more room.
> 
> From: Denis <coocoo@xxxxxxx>
> To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Sun, April 7, 2013 8:31:02 PM
> Subject: [tcb] Re: BFGs vs. Grabbers
> 
> Murray has 185 60 15s. I don’t know if that adds anything to the discussion.
>  
> From: Julie
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2013 7:00 PM
> To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [tcb] Re: BFGs vs. Grabbers
>  
> Yes Sonne is a '60.  Um, I stole all of the running gear from my '66.  I know 
> my tranny is a freeway flyer and I do still have my gear reduction boxes.  As 
> for the size of nuts, being a girl I don't know big from small.  
> 
> On Apr 7, 2013, at 6:52 PM, sammie smith <bugcollections@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Sonne is a 60 model, right?  Early bus has no lip on the fender well and 
>> much less space between fender and the brake drum than on the 64-67 busses.  
>> Anything bigger than stock is not easy to get in there.  It's possible to go 
>> slightly bigger than stock 6:40X15 but it isn't easy to mount the wheel on 
>> the brake drum. Just not enough clearance with the fender.  And if you have 
>> a big nut tranny in it the brake drums are a bit wider than the original 
>> small nut tranny and that also uses up space.  And I do hope you are going 
>> to run a big nut tranny cause you are going to take forever to get to Shasta 
>> if running the gear ratios in the small nut.
>>  
>> From: Julie <julie.hey.ho.lets.go@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Sun, April 7, 2013 6:30:35 PM
>> Subject: [tcb] Re: BFGs vs. Grabbers
>> 
>> Yes Sonne is the DC.  But I know someone who is on this list that has 
>> Grabbers on his Bus and he does not remember having trouble getting them on 
>> and Shasta guys use them and they all have Splits.  
>> 
>> On Apr 7, 2013, at 6:05 PM, sammie smith <bugcollections@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Which bus is Sonne.  If the DC, yep, you have trouble fitting tires much 
>>> larger than stock under the fender wells of a split bus.  Something you 
>>> have to consider; unless of course you wish to cut out the fender wells, in 
>>> which case you will be banned permanently from all things splitty.
>>>  
>>> From: Julie <julie.hey.ho.lets.go@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: "tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: Sun, April 7, 2013 3:33:02 PM
>>> Subject: [tcb] BFGs vs. Grabbers
>>> 
>>> I have been looking into buying the tires for Sonne.  Some Shasta guys say 
>>> Grabbers and some say BFGs. I have Grabbers on Wieder (zebra) and love 
>>> them!  The BFGs are smaller than the Grabbers but have better load rating. 
>>> BFGs D-8 ply and Grabbers C-6 ply. I love how the Grabbers look and fear 
>>> the BFGs won't look as tough.  Grabbers 27/8.50R14 (216/76R14) BFGs 
>>> 195/74/R14 (195/75R14) BFGs are 1.41" smaller in diameter/.83" smaller in 
>>> width/4.43" smaller in circumference/.71" shorter in sidewall height.  
>>> Currently my Grabbers (borrowed from Wieder) are not fitting in on the rear 
>>> of Sonne. My metal guy blames the WW metal pieces being off, I am not so 
>>> sure of that.  So maybe BFGs will fit without re-doing the metal work.  
>>> Grabbers are cheaper and I imagine will look tougher being that they are 
>>> larger and will give Sonne more clearance. I am thinking of staying with 
>>> Grabbers.  What do you guys think?  

Other related posts: